Debate Expectations

[wdbtchr]

.
<=== notice

I have no expectations. I won't watch/listen. I don't need the bullshit. I find none of the participants entertaining or enlightening. I already know that Hillary is a crusty political whore and Tromp is a psychopathic pimp who (subtly!) promotes domestic assassination and promises to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity. I'm in hold-my-nose mode -- but I don't need more input to confirm that.

I believe you hit the nail on the head!

 

[eyerami]

It just makes no sense to me at all to proclaim that whomever wins the first debate wins the entire enchilada.

No doubt that can quite possibly materialize as happening factually on November 8, and no doubt one of the bozos could make such an impactful gaffe that could lose them the election, but with two more debates and, what, six weeks still left after the first debate, it ain't going to be over til the fat lady sings...

...or The Donald's wig gets shown the door, or Billary croaks.

If I'm a player with three to play, I'm looking at the entire series and concentrating on simply doing as well as I possibly can in the first one - nothing more, nothing less...

Let's face it: America's oldest nominee faceoff between the oldest person ever to take Office if he wins, and America's second oldest person ever to take Office if she wins, can't possibly contain a whole bunch of swinging for the fences throughout all three debates. No, the best strategy is simply to be smooth and consistent in the first one, and let the other bozo swing all the knockout punches s/he wants - I'm not sure how much more immaturely offensive, 6th-grade attacking Americans can tolerate.

I believe the cool, calm, steady approach will garner the most votes from the first debate, which will set up the best possible position to begin the second debate from.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

IMO, If it's a serious debate (no poo flinging ) , whoever wins Monday night will be the elected. Trump will be under pressure to act presidential, look like he belongs there.

Hillary must destroy Trump, anything less will be an epic fail because she has painted Trump as a Clown.

Low bar for Trump, mount Everest for Hillary (no pun intended).

If they are standing, edge to Trump.

For whatever reason, Americans like their Presidents tall...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

It just makes no sense to me at all to proclaim that whomever wins the first debate wins the entire enchilada.

No doubt that can quite possibly materialize as happening factually on November 8, and no doubt one of the bozos could make such an impactful gaffe that could lose them the election, but with two more debates and, what, six weeks still left after the first debate, it ain't going to be over til the fat lady sings...

...or The Donald's wig gets shown the door, or Billary croaks.

If I'm a player with three to play, I'm looking at the entire series and concentrating on simply doing as well as I possibly can in the first one - nothing more, nothing less...

Let's face it: America's oldest nominee faceoff between the oldest person ever to take Office if he wins, and America's second oldest person ever to take Office if she wins, can't possibly contain a whole bunch of swinging for the fences throughout all three debates. No, the best strategy is simply to be smooth and consistent in the first one, and let the other bozo swing all the knockout punches s/he wants - I'm not sure how much more immaturely offensive, 6th-grade attacking Americans can tolerate.

I believe the cool, calm, steady approach will garner the most votes from the first debate, which will set up the best possible position to begin the second debate from.

Yes it does, in a way...

Right now Trump is rising and a perceived win (by the undecideds) continues the trend upwards whereas Clinton similarly might stop the bleeding and remain competitive relying on that famed Democrat get out the vote machine. Hell, they're working hard to get as many illegal immigrants to the polls as they possibly can!



VOTE NOW! Ask question only later if challenged in a recount...

 

[Forest_Pixie]

Its like picking between a douche and a turd. I don't see America winning ether way in this election. I see it coming down to the lesser of the two evils....whomever that maybe

 

[NOIRTRASH]

Its like picking between a douche and a turd. I don't see America winning ether way in this election. I see it coming down to the lesser of the two evils....whomever that maybe

The other day I told my wife, IN THIS LIFE YOU CANT GET PASSED THE GATE OF MOST THINGS. No cheerleader or BMOC. No Harvard. No Miss America. No Oscar. Katie Couric don't wanna interview you. Ditto Obama. On average each of us is told, 300,000 times, that we suck in one way or another. And Trump/Hillary are our nation's best.

 

[Que]

The news networks have been Trump's best friends since he declared, and I expect that to continue on Monday.

Trump's facility for self-promotion is his best friend. The networks aren't covering him because they want him to look good the networks are covering him because he makes for good TV which sells advertising they have zero interest in promoting him.

 

[eyerami]

...

Fuckoff, wannabe.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

It just makes no sense to me at all to proclaim that whomever wins the first debate wins the entire enchilada.

No doubt that can quite possibly materialize as happening factually on November 8, and no doubt one of the bozos could make such an impactful gaffe that could lose them the election, but with two more debates and, what, six weeks still left after the first debate, it ain't going to be over til the fat lady sings...

...or The Donald's wig gets shown the door, or Billary croaks.

If I'm a player with three to play, I'm looking at the entire series and concentrating on simply doing as well as I possibly can in the first one - nothing more, nothing less...

Let's face it: America's oldest nominee faceoff between the oldest person ever to take Office if he wins, and America's second oldest person ever to take Office if she wins, can't possibly contain a whole bunch of swinging for the fences throughout all three debates. No, the best strategy is simply to be smooth and consistent in the first one, and let the other bozo swing all the knockout punches s/he wants - I'm not sure how much more immaturely offensive, 6th-grade attacking Americans can tolerate.

I believe the cool, calm, steady approach will garner the most votes from the first debate, which will set up the best possible position to begin the second debate from.

As an avowed non-participant in this society who "lives" in the middle of nowhere for the alleged purpose of paying few if any government taxes, why would you give a shit what happens in a debate, who is elected, or how they spend money from the public coffer that you don't pay into or benefit from?

Your voluntarily withdrawal from the political/social arena unarguably declares your resolve to not do the least little thing to solve the problems of a corrupt, illegitimate government you keep ranting against, so why do you keep talking?

There is no bigger wannabe than the coward who takes his ball and goes home because he doesn't like the way the game is being played.

Since you've consistently trashed both candidates and prejudged the continued decline of our country no matter who is running for office, one would have to assume you are NOT voting. Am I wrong about that?

Exactly what do you get out of "living" your miserable nihilistic "life"?

 

[snugglestruggle]

It just makes no sense to me at all to proclaim that whomever wins the first debate wins the entire enchilada.

No doubt that can quite possibly materialize as happening factually on November 8, and no doubt one of the bozos could make such an impactful gaffe that could lose them the election, but with two more debates and, what, six weeks still left after the first debate, it ain't going to be over til the fat lady sings...

...or The Donald's wig gets shown the door, or Billary croaks.

If I'm a player with three to play, I'm looking at the entire series and concentrating on simply doing as well as I possibly can in the first one - nothing more, nothing less...

Let's face it: America's oldest nominee faceoff between the oldest person ever to take Office if he wins, and America's second oldest person ever to take Office if she wins, can't possibly contain a whole bunch of swinging for the fences throughout all three debates. No, the best strategy is simply to be smooth and consistent in the first one, and let the other bozo swing all the knockout punches s/he wants - I'm not sure how much more immaturely offensive, 6th-grade attacking Americans can tolerate.

I believe the cool, calm, steady approach will garner the most votes from the first debate, which will set up the best possible position to begin the second debate from.

I think you underestimate the attention span and intelligence of the American public lol.

 

[xbb]

I expect her to fall into her commode

Short Hillary wanted to debate tall Trump on a STEP STOOL – but was turned down – and


Short Hillary wanted to debate tall Trump on a STEP STOOL – but was turned down – and she won't get commercial breaks for coughing fits or fainting spells
The Clinton campaign asked the Commission on Presidential Debates to give her a step stool so she wouldn't look much shorter than Donald Trump
Clinton stands 5'4", nearly a foot shorter than Trump's 6'2"
The commission turned down her request but is allowing a custom-built podium to minimize Trump's height advantage
There will be no commercial breaks during the 90-minute debate Monday night, leaving Clinton on camera if she faints or has a coughing episode


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz4L6vz79cC
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[Hypoxia]

I think you underestimate the attention span and intelligence of the American public lol.

When Tromp's skull hinges open and wee little green aliens crawl out during the debate, few will notice. It's like the famous psych experiment where basketball players passed a ball around and a guy in a gorilla suit walked past and through them, cavorting a bit. Most in the audience never saw the ape-man. They only saw what they expected. In debate, Tromp could speak calmly whilst crushing live hamsters in salad bowl. Few will notice; none will speak up. They might notice when the bomb under his lectern explodes.

What do I *really* expect? Alas, historian Prof Alan Lichtman has correctly predicted all prez elections since 1984 based on objective measures. He says Trump will win in November. The debates are irrelevant. I expect that his plane will be shot from the sky the following day. With him aboard. Assuming he's not offed sooner. I don't see him surviving into December. This is not a threat, nor a premonition. I just have a gut feeling...

 

[snugglestruggle]

When Tromp's skull hinges open and wee little green aliens crawl out during the debate, few will notice. It's like the famous psych experiment where basketball players passed a ball around and a guy in a gorilla suit walked past and through them, cavorting a bit. Most in the audience never saw the ape-man. They only saw what they expected. In debate, Tromp could speak calmly whilst crushing live hamsters in salad bowl. Few will notice; none will speak up. They might notice when the bomb under his lectern explodes.

What do I *really* expect? Alas, historian Prof Alan Lichtman has correctly predicted all prez elections since 1984 based on objective measures. He says Trump will win in November. The debates are irrelevant. I expect that his plane will be shot from the sky the following day. With him aboard. Assuming he's not offed sooner. I don't see him surviving into December. This is not a threat, nor a premonition. I just have a gut feeling...

What's that your hiding behind your back? Is that a stinger missile I see? lol

 

[eyerami]

Exactly what do you get out of "living" your miserable nihilistic "life"?

The opportunity to continually read a total speculator ego so naturally empty HE MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED AS BEING RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING HE SPECULATES UPON or else HE STARTS WHINING AND YELLING LIKE A SPOILED LITTLE PLAYGROUND CUNT...

What else in "life" could there possibly be to "liv"e for, Butthurt?

 

[sr71plt]

I expect Hillary to walk out with a set of scales and a tape measure and suggest a true height-weight obesity check.

 

[Que]

I expect Hillary to walk out with a set of scales and a tape measure and suggest a true height-weight obesity check.

That must be the reason she wears tents over her pantsuits. To keep the wolf-whistles down.

 

[sr71plt]

That must be the reason she wears tents over her pantsuits. To keep the wolf-whistles down.

The check of them both would certainly show who was vain and (along with their doctor) was a congenital liar. Sure, check them both--and compare the results with their doctors' report. (Who would be afraid to do that? )

 

[Que]

The check of them both would certainly show who was vain and (along with their doctor) was a congenital liar. Sure, check them both--and compare the results with their doctors' report. (Who would be afraid to do that? )

The one that looks like a fainting goat?

 

[sr71plt]

The one that looks like a fainting goat?

You mean Trump's writing-challenged doctor or are you just embarrassed to talk about what Trump reports on his health as opposed to what could be checked out in front the debate audience? Yes, about both of them, but you seem to be squirming and trying to avoid the topic with irrelevancies.

 

[Beco]

Hillary having a coughing fit, would be like winning the game because the opposing quarterback hurt his knee and had to leave the game....You want head to head competition, full strength, may the best man or woman win!

My guess.....Hillary, unless she screams like an old lady

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Hillary having a coughing fit, would be like winning the game because the opposing quarterback hurt his knee and had to leave the game....You want head to head competition, full strength, may the best man or woman win!

My guess.....Hillary, unless she screams like an old lady

IF she screams it will BE an old lady screaming not an illusion of one.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2016-09/197220_5_.jpg


In the spirit of busybody...

 

[phrodeau]

Mark Cuban will get a front-row seat at Monday's debate. He will have a large supply of popcorn.

 

[Adre]

She should laugh at him, make a few jokes about him. When Obama did this at the correspondents dinner in 2011 it just about drove him fucking nuts.

 

[Aglaopheme]

When Tromp's skull hinges open and wee little green aliens crawl out during the debate, few will notice. It's like the famous psych experiment where basketball players passed a ball around and a guy in a gorilla suit walked past and through them, cavorting a bit. Most in the audience never saw the ape-man. They only saw what they expected. In debate, Tromp could speak calmly whilst crushing live hamsters in salad bowl. Few will notice; none will speak up. They might notice when the bomb under his lectern explodes.

What do I *really* expect? Alas, historian Prof Alan Lichtman has correctly predicted all prez elections since 1984 based on objective measures. He says Trump will win in November. The debates are irrelevant. I expect that his plane will be shot from the sky the following day. With him aboard. Assuming he's not offed sooner. I don't see him surviving into December. This is not a threat, nor a premonition. I just have a gut feeling...

From your article:

We've never before seen a candidate who's spent his life enriching himself at the expense of others. He's the first candidate in our history to be a serial fabricator, making up things as he goes along. Even when he tells the truth, such as, "Barack Obama really was born in the U.S.," he adds two lines, that Hillary Clinton started the birther movement, and that he finished it, even though when Barack Obama put out his birth certificate, he didn't believe it. We've never had a candidate before who not just once, but twice in a thinly disguised way, has incited violence against an opponent. We've never had a candidate before who's invited a hostile foreign power to meddle in American elections. We've never had a candidate before who's threatened to start a war by blowing ships out of the water in the Persian Gulf if they come too close to us. We've never had a candidate before who has embraced as a role model a murderous, hostile foreign dictator. Given all of these exceptions that Donald Trump represents, he may well shatter patterns of history that have held for more than 150 years, lose this election even if the historical circumstances favor it.

Did it kill him to go through his keys and find Tump coming out on top?