"Deadliest Catch" seamen say fishermen not greedy.

fgarvb1

We are in for it now.
Joined
Dec 10, 2000
Posts
12,729
"Deadliest Catch" seamen say fishermen not greedy

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090729/tv_nm/us_deadliestcatch


By Christine Kearney Christine Kearney – 31 mins ago
NEW YORK (Reuters) – Boat captains from the U.S. television show "Deadliest Catch," which chronicles the perils of Bering Sea crab fishing, say small commercial fishermen are unfairly blamed in the debate over declining fish populations.

Marine ecologists and environmentalists have criticized commercial fishing and what they see as a lack of proper government regulation since large-scale industrial fishing began decades ago.

Several fishing boat captains from the Emmy-nominated cable TV show say government bodies and fisheries need to set wiser fishing quotas to ensure healthy fish populations and a balanced food chain. The show's fifth season finale airs on Tuesday on the Discovery Channel cable television network.

"When things go wrong, the fishermen get blamed, but the truth is we are only fishing what they tell us we can fish," captain Phil Harris told Reuters, referring to the quotas that Alaskan crab fisherman like him are given at the beginning of each season setting limits to how much they can catch.

Harris, 52, and other captains are seen on the show, which airs in 170 countries, displaying their prowess in catching king and Opilio crab in dangerous currents and icy conditions in the Bering Sea between Alaska and Russia.

The television series, which began in 2005, features Harris and other captains and their crews risking their lives for commercial fishing. Alaska is home to one of the world's largest food fisheries.

"It makes me so angry when people talk about overfishing. We have never overfished, they give us a quota and we catch it," said captain Andy Hillstrand, who heads his family-owned vessel the "Time Bandit." "People call fishermen greedy, but it is not their job to regulate it."

'HIGH EXPLOITATION'

Michael Crocker, a fisherman turned environmentalist who has written about fisheries management, said fishermen should be included in debates on solutions to overfishing.

"Not all fisherman are the same. There are small mom-and-pop fisherman who have a relatively small impact on the ocean," Crocker said, adding that larger fishing conglomerates or vessels were unfairly favored in some quota systems. "It rewards high exploitation."

Scientists, environmentalists and the commercial fishing industry often differ on opinions of fish quotas in Alaska.

Last December, the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, which oversees management of fishing off Alaska, cut catches of Alaskan pollock because of a reduction of stocks in the Bering Sea.

Some environmentalists argued for an even smaller harvest quota, saying the Bering Sea is undergoing drastic changes that might cause fisheries to crash.

The captains vowed to argue for the rights of fishermen even after the show finishes. It will air its sixth season next year and its future is unclear after that.

"We are not celebrities, we are crab fisherman, and somebody started coming and taking pictures," said captain Sig Hansen, 43, a fourth-generation fisherman. "When the show goes off (the air) people won't know my name. I know that."

(Editing by Michelle Nichols and Will Dunham)
 
That's weird, I was going to make a thread asking board conservatives how they felt about fishery regulation today.

It seems to me like an iron clad case of good use of regulation.

tragedy of the commons and all that.
 
Growing global population creating demand for protein, coupled with poor stock-management in prior decades...something's got to give.

That being said, MASA's $1,000 prie-fix dinner was well worth it.
 
Growing global population creating demand for protein, coupled with poor stock-management in prior decades...something's got to give.

That being said, MASA's $1,000 prie-fix dinner was well worth it.

The market ought to sort everything out.
 
The market ought to sort everything out.

I think we're too far gone for that. You do suggest a solution to people texting/otherwise distracted whilst driving: confiscate their car. The cost of buying a new car will outweigh their desire to be otherwise distracted. Problem solved.
 
The world fishing fleet is but a pinprick on the vast ocean. If they see fewer fish, the fish probably just moved somewhere else.

The ocean is something we know so little about, yet pretend to be able to manage. It's all politics.
 
The world fishing fleet is but a pinprick on the vast ocean. If they see fewer fish, the fish probably just moved somewhere else.

The ocean is something we know so little about, yet pretend to be able to manage. It's all politics.

So you are opposed to regulation, I take it.

Let people fish as much as they want, and if the catch declines, it's because the fish went somewhere else.
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/27/hard-times-driving-more-p_n_245574.html

Michigan Messenger:

Despite health deptartment warnings that many Michigan fish are contaminated with mercury, PCBs, dioxin and other chemicals in this Democrat-run state, more people are fishing in order to put food on their tables, according to this Detroit Free Press story, which quotes a Dept. of Natural Resources spokeswoman as saying, "It's a great way to feed a family."
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/27/hard-times-driving-more-p_n_245574.html

Michigan Messenger:

Despite health deptartment warnings that many Michigan fish are contaminated with mercury, PCBs, dioxin and other chemicals in this Democrat-run state, more people are fishing in order to put food on their tables, according to this Detroit Free Press story, which quotes a Dept. of Natural Resources spokeswoman as saying, "It's a great way to feed a family."

Oh fuck please don't tell me this idiot is blaming the Democrats for this.
 
Oh fuck please don't tell me this idiot is blaming the Democrats for this.

Of course he is. He's got nothing else. If he can't get an erection to jack off, he'll blame it on either "liberals" or "Democrats" slipping him mickeys in his drinks.
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/27/hard-times-driving-more-p_n_245574.html

Michigan Messenger:

Despite health deptartment warnings that many Michigan fish are contaminated with mercury, PCBs, dioxin and other chemicals in this Democrat-run state, more people are fishing in order to put food on their tables, according to this Detroit Free Press story, which quotes a Dept. of Natural Resources spokeswoman as saying, "It's a great way to feed a family."


i got news for you, retard. those fish have been poison for years. it has nothing to do with democrats and everything to do with how stupid we(as in everyone) were with chemicals back in the day. do you even know where dioxins and pcb comes from? do you think fucking democrats iinvented them because their dicks?

goddamn, i fucking hate stupid people.
 
Oh fuck please don't tell me this idiot is blaming the Democrats for this.

Blaming them for what?

The heavy metal poisoning is from heavy industry..we are all to blame for that, Republican factory owners and Democrat workers.

I think off2bed may be saying something along the lines of "regulation of fishing would keep families from feeding themselves in hard times" which doesn't have much to do with what I'm talking about--offshore industrial fishing.
 
Blaming them for what?

The heavy metal poisoning is from heavy industry..we are all to blame for that, Republican factory owners and Democrat workers.

I think off2bed may be saying something along the lines of "regulation of fishing would keep families from feeding themselves in hard times" which doesn't have much to do with what I'm talking about--offshore industrial fishing.

The mention of Democrats right after poison makes it seem the messenger (not off2bed) is implying it's the Dem's fault.

But you're right, his post has nothing to do with the OP further proving he's just a right wing shit stirrer.
 
I'm mostly just pushing you guys' buttons. You make it too easy, you know.

Nobody knows how many fish there are in the ocean, therefore it's impossible to know if we are "overfishing." I think it's merely guilt coupled with the liberal desire to control everyone and everything.

The Michigan story was just something I'd heard that was sort of on-topic for the thread. More people are fishing (overfishing?) because they are taking personal responsibility for feeding themselves. That's a good thing.

And on commercial fishing, if you want them to catch fewer fish, stop buying it.
 
I'm mostly just pushing you guys' buttons. You make it too easy, you know.

Nobody knows how many fish there are in the ocean, therefore it's impossible to know if we are "overfishing." I think it's merely guilt coupled with the liberal desire to control everyone and everything.

The Michigan story was just something I'd heard that was sort of on-topic for the thread. More people are fishing (overfishing?) because they are taking personal responsibility for feeding themselves. That's a good thing.

And on commercial fishing, if you want them to catch fewer fish, stop buying it.

I actually buy more ocean fish (snapper, kingfish) because I'm pretty sure that in 20 years, there won't be any fish at all.
 
I'm mostly just pushing you guys' buttons. You make it too easy, you know.

Nobody knows how many fish there are in the ocean, therefore it's impossible to know if we are "overfishing." I think it's merely guilt coupled with the liberal desire to control everyone and everything.

The Michigan story was just something I'd heard that was sort of on-topic for the thread. More people are fishing (overfishing?) because they are taking personal responsibility for feeding themselves. That's a good thing.

And on commercial fishing, if you want them to catch fewer fish, stop buying it.

there are fish in the great lakes that are so contiminated with pcbs that to eat one greatly increases your chances of developing cancer. i was told that when engler was governor and that fat fuck was a republican.
 
I actually buy more ocean fish (snapper, kingfish) because I'm pretty sure that in 20 years, there won't be any fish at all.
"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem." :D

Relax, of course there will be fish there. Now, whether the government will let us catch it is another matter...
 
I don't think so. I don't equate deep philosophical differences with lack of intelligence.

how about the inability to grasp simple concepts like fish that store carcinogens in their fat tend to cause cancer when you eat them?
 
Back
Top