Darwin....?

[Guest]

 

[phrodeau]

phrodeau: go ahead wise guy...refute it point by point...smart boy

To what end, yayati? So you can rebut that I am a hater? Did you even read the article before you posted it?

To start with, the author describes simple biological structures and even molecules as having intelligent motivation. These things operate under atomic forces, not their own volition. He describes a cell building its walls like a mason. Cell walls form because that's the way the molecules fall together.

He also describes several aspects of current theory as incomprehensible. He can't imagine it, therefore it can't be possible. Here is one quote: (Getting dry amino acids
heated to 280 degrees in nature requires quite a bit of
imagination.) Has he never seen a volcano?

His abuse of probability theory is laughable. He claims that the odds of a specific bioform to generate is astronomical. Of course it is. But there are billions of possible bioforms that could give rise to life on Earth, and only one was needed. And incidentally, that bioform did not need to come into existence on our planet. It might have formed in space long before the Earth did.

Before I go any further with this, why don't you choose the most compelling argument from the essay and I will concentrate on refuting that.

 

[Byron In Exile]

byron: im not saying e/o is a hater its just that some ppl like to make issues out of it....

Sorry if you thought I was making an issue of your six-paq. Actually, I don't know that it's not just a figment of your imagination, so I'm not jealous of it.

Byron: u live in the UK or near any beaches...?

California. Long coastline and many beaches.

 

[ithaqua]

six-paq - six beers in a single box.

 

[Guest]