Dan Rather - Just amazing

Todd

Virgin
Joined
Jan 1, 2001
Posts
6,893
DAN RATHER – JUST AMAZING

Rather appeared on O’Reilly’s Fox News Channel show. He was promoting a book – otherwise, I’m sure you wouldn’t have seen him there.

Rather calls himself a “journalist.” Tell me, would a true journalist hold these opinions?

First, Rather said that he believes that Bill Clinton is “an honest person.” Multiple affairs, perjury, lying to the American people, lying on his income tax returns, and Rather thinks he’s an honest person.

Rather says that he “barely remembers” the Juanita Broaddrick matter. He says the story didn’t run on his newscast because it was “about somebody’s private sex life.” Thus, we find that Rather thinks that rape is just another part of somebody’s private sex life.

Oh . just one more. Rather says that the whole Broaddrick matter was “Republicans trying to bring down Bill Clinton.”

And you think the mainstream New York media isn’t biased?
 
Todd said:
DAN RATHER – JUST AMAZING

Rather appeared on O’Reilly’s Fox News Channel show. He was promoting a book – otherwise, I’m sure you wouldn’t have seen him there.

Rather calls himself a “journalist.” Tell me, would a true journalist hold these opinions?

First, Rather said that he believes that Bill Clinton is “an honest person.” Multiple affairs, perjury, lying to the American people, lying on his income tax returns, and Rather thinks he’s an honest person.

Rather says that he “barely remembers” the Juanita Broaddrick matter. He says the story didn’t run on his newscast because it was “about somebody’s private sex life.” Thus, we find that Rather thinks that rape is just another part of somebody’s private sex life.

Oh . just one more. Rather says that the whole Broaddrick matter was “Republicans trying to bring down Bill Clinton.”

And you think the mainstream New York media isn’t biased?

Todd there are a lot of better reasons to think "Dangerous" Dan is a dolt.

I'm sure that your hated Dems could give you a bagfull as well.
 
Todd said:
Expertise said:
I'm sure that your hated Dems could give you a bagfull as well.

How so he is in thier back pockets

Because he is an incompetent dolt who makes absolutely spectacular errors with stunning regularity.

I'm sure even the Dems are saying "Thanks Dan...... but shut the fuck up you ain't helpin'"
 
For the life of me,
I do not understand why people in general seem to think that the person reading the news to them is of keen enough intellect to think for them.
But they do! ;)
 
Because they are on "Thuh T-V and they got that thar purty hair and a go to church suit that'd do a revenuer proud".

Ahhhhh 'the great unwashed" god love 'em.
 
Todd

Todd said:
Rather calls himself a “journalist.” Tell me, would a true journalist hold these opinions?

Journalists are people *shock! horror!* and can hold any opinions they want. The only difference between us and them is that they tend to be more published. That doesn't mean what they write about is any more accurate or true than what we would write.

:)
 
Rape Todd?

You have proof....?

Or a conviction entry?

If it was rape why didn't she just report it immediately?

Conjecture and insinuation aren't news...except in tabloid journalism.

And thank you, I can think for myself and I think it is rather arrogant and condescending for any of you to insinuate that becuase we don't see things just exactly like you do that we are brainwashed.

Dan has his opinions and I have mine....I am capable of gleaning fact from the rest of the drivel.

On the other hand it would appear that most of what comes from the right is straight from the horse's ass...Rush in case ya wondered.
 
The problem is the vast majority plugged into the pop-culture matrix that never once stop to question or even think about what they see and hear. The Rush fans are not the ones I worry about. Nor the Todd's. He just seems to post whatever he's read that he enjoys. If I were to post something, the first of Diane Alden's piece was very intreauging...
 
Back
Top