Dakota Fanning and her new movie "Hounddog"

Pure

Fiel a Verdad
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Posts
15,135
The movie is being called child porn, and in any case, exploitive of Ms. Fanning. What say you? I'm supposing none of us has seen it yet.


Dakota Fanning: 'It's called acting'

POSTED: 9:24 p.m. EST, January 24, 2007



PARK CITY, Utah (AP) -- At a festival that features several films with sexual content, including full male nudity and a documentary about bestiality, a Southern Gothic tale that includes the rape of a young girl is causing the biggest stir.

"Hounddog" is the story of Lewellen, a girl played by 12-year-old Dakota Fanning, who is growing up in the 1960s South. She is a free-spirit obsessed with Elvis Presley and has little supervision by her abusive father and alcoholic grandmother.

Even before the first screening of "Hounddog" at the Sundance Film Festival this week, a Christian film critic, citing Fanning's age, decried the movie as child abuse, and Roman Catholic activist Bill Donohue called for a federal investigation. (Gallery of young actresses in risque roles)

Fanning is defending her work as well as the movie, and so is the head of Sundance, who said it was courageous for director Deborah Kampmeier to tackle "challenging material." "Hounddog" is entered in the festival's dramatic category. (Blog: Read the reaction of CNN's Brooke Anderson.)

"It's not a rape movie," Fanning said Tuesday. "That's not even the point of the film." (Watch Fanning's dance with a lamp pole 'microphone' and her take on the role )

Fanning is upset at people who have criticized her family and colleagues.

"When it gets to the point of attacking my mother, my agent ... my teacher, who were all on the set that day, that started to make me mad," she said in an interview with Reuters.

"I can let other things go, but when people start to talk about my mother, like, that's really bad in my opinion ... that's an attack, and that's not fair. They hadn't seen the movie," she added.

The disturbing scene lasts a few minutes but is not graphic. There is no nudity, the scene is very darkly lit and only Fanning's face and hand are shown.

Kampmeier said it took her a decade to get the film made, largely because of the rape scene, but cutting it was a compromise she was unwilling to make.

"This issue is so silenced in our society. There are a lot of women who are alone with this story," she said.

"When you're shooting a film, it's the images you line up next to each other that create a story," Kampmeier said. "If you have a hand hitting the ground, Dakota screaming 'stop' and you see a zipper unzip -- that creates a rape."

Ted Baehr, chairman of the Christian Film and Television Commission and publisher of the Web site movieguide.org, claims "Hounddog" breaks federal child-pornography law. He said the law covers material that "appears" to show minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

"Even if they're not actually performing the explicit act, we are dealing with a legal issue here," he said.

Baehr said Fanning is being exploited in the film, and that it should be considered an outrage.

"Children at 12 do not have the ability to make the types of decisions that we're talking about here," he said. "If we're offended by some comedian's racial slur, why aren't we offended by somebody taking advantage of a 12-year-old child?"

Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, said he has asked the U.S. Justice Department to investigate whether anti-pornography laws have been broken.

Two other children perform in the film. Cody Hanford plays Buddy, and Isabelle Fuhrman plays a girl nicknamed "Grasshopper."

Kampmeier said she talked with the children and their parents but didn't go into great detail with the young actors about the content.

"I didn't have to articulate to Cody and Isabelle the psychological elements that were going on in this film," she said. "I used images to tell the story. I didn't manipulate these children or explain to these children what was going on."

Fanning said she and Kampmeier talked for months before the film was shot and spent a day painting pottery together and discussing the story.

"It's not really happening," Fanning said of a rape. "It's a movie, and it's called acting. I'm not going through anything. Cody and Isabelle aren't going through anything, their characters are.

"And for me, when it's done it's done," she said. "I don't even think about it anymore."

Sundance director Geoffrey Gilmore said independent filmmakers should pursue sensitive subject matter. (EW: Sundance 2007)

"I feel the mission and very nature of what Sundance is about is to provide a platform for that," he said.

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
 
It can't possibly be worse than Bastard Out Of Carolina. I'm not a fan of children being used that way, but doubt it's even remotely close to child porn. When will these guys learn that they're just fueling the press for the movie by complaining like this (or maybe they know and are just trying to generate press for themselves).
 
I heard about this movie and the controversy surrounding it while having dinner at Denny's late last night. We shouldn't even be surprised that there are religious fanatics that are so concerned with content in a movie, that's what they do best - Make controversy when there doesn't need to be. It's a movie and in my opinion, it;s regarding a topic that is too sheltered. No one talks about it and that's the problem. Many women feel very much alone when it comes to rape and I think that there should be more movies, books, episodes of television shows, newspaper articles, etc. etc. I'm not saying that every media medium should be littered with rape and sexual assault especially against children, but it's something that more people need to be aware of. That yes, it does happen and it is something that people must be more educated about, whether they are a survivor of this type of assault, have a friend or relative who has gone through it, want to be educated more on the subject just for the sake of being educated or none of these - Every person living in the world today should be educated on the topic so I welcome movies such as these that are courageous enough to even hit on this subject.

If there is no nudity and the scene in the movie is suggestive rather than all out and in your face, I see absolutely no problem with it at all.

Dakota Fanning is a fantastic actress, especially at such a young age. I find it admirable that even with the negative hype this movie is getting she is standing up for herself as well as the work she has done in the movie. She knows what she's doing, 12 isn't that young of an age where she is way too young to make an informed decision such as this for her career.
 
The problem as I see it -

This really happens in real life a lot more than we want to think.

It's my understanding that the rape scene was handled with care and civility. It shows nothing but Dakota Fannings hands and face.

The God Squad appearantly thinks if they can remove this scene from the public eye then the problem doesn't exist. Fuck the dumb bastards!
 
'Cause you know... 12 year olds don't get raped.

That's how I can tell it's not pornographic.

I know 12 year olds who've been raped... I've never had a mostly naked pizza delivery woman want to fuck my brains out.

Usually, I'm worried that the guy who is delivering it might have touched my food.
 
No one is asking or forcing these people to view this movie.

If the Bible Beaters want to get their knickers in a twist about something involving child sex, then let 'em shut down those 'beauty contests' for little girls. Participation in these things lead to the death of JonBenet Ramsey IMHO.

Talk about a pervo's dream.
 
drksideofthemoon said:
Oh, okay...off to Google Dakota Fanning... I don't go to the movies, and don't watch any on television....
She was most recently in "Charlotte's Web"--but she's been in movies with more provacative themes, like "Man on Fire."

The reason this is getting attention is because she's not only rising star, but she's very pretty and, in movies like "Man on Fire" she is sometimes protrayed in that "Lolita" position: both as a little girl hugging her teddy bear, and as a girl savvy beyond her years in regards to sexuality.

That is why this movie is getting the attention it's getting. If the actress had been unknown, I doubt anyone would be talking. It's because it's Dakota Fanning, and she has the same "Lolita" energy that Brooke Shields had in "Pretty Baby" (playing a 12 year old prostitute) and Jodie Foster had in "Taxi Driver" (playing a 12 year old prostitute). From "Lolita" on, discussing this subject has difficult for people. Many think that adolsecents having sex (willingly or unwillingly with oldern men or even kids their own age) happens if we write stories about it, and if we don't, then it will magically vanish :rolleyes:
 
A very good opinion on the socialized cowardice of a nation. I guess it is easier to close your eyes and hope it goes away.
 
Back
Top