Cut vs Uncut

Cut or Uncut, what penis do you prefer?

  • Cut

    Votes: 50 67.6%
  • Uncut

    Votes: 24 32.4%

  • Total voters
    74
  • Poll closed .
first husband - cut
second husband - uncut
third husband - cut

so two out of three were cut but honestly the third was the 'best' as far as sex - and a BJ was not much different between the cut or uncut, 'in my opinion'.
 
flawed poll

There needs to be a third category: "Either is fine with me."

The world isn't made in black or white. . .
 
There needs to be a third category: "Either is fine with me."

The world isn't made in black or white. . .
Or one for "who cares"! Cocks are cocks, and I love them all. As long as they shoot cum down my throat and/or up my ass, they are all fine with me.
 
My wife "made" me get circumcised. It actually turned out to be quite an erotic journey for both of us. So clearly, her vote would be for cut.
 
not cool

Interesting results given that circumcision really is genital mutilation of an infant with zero medical benefit and has some degree of risk involved for the baby.

The history of having it done in North America came in large part from Dr. Kellogg who mandated it to prevent masturbation as he had the mistaken notion that sex for anything but procreation was unhealthy. Despite inventing corn flakes, he was of dubious distinction.

The foreskin is supposed to be there and removing it means a loss of 4 square inches of flesh in an adult male.

Yeah, I'm uncut.
 
I prefer cut dicks when giving a blowjob.

My wife seems to prefer sucking uncut.

PS. I’m cut...lol
 
From above...
The history of having it done in North America came in large part from Dr. Kellogg who mandated it to prevent masturbation as he had the mistaken notion that sex for anything but procreation was unhealthy...

Kellogg also suggested placing sutures so Erections couldn't happen, AND then for good measure for those naughty girls, carbolic acid applied to the clitoris. He also seemed to recommend Enemas for an awful lot of ailments, including Nymphomania in women, also the removal of the clitoris.

Gunna look at the cereal aisle a lot differently now.

Brit - Uncut

Cut are rare here, fiancee's never tried one, can't say I'd fancy it, kinda attached to mine (awful I know)
 
Thanks for adding that. My first draft included the bit about carbolic acid, but was too lazy today to check my sources. Strange that 2 ideas lasted from that man's head; breakfast cereal and circumcision... of course it didn't work as he intended... everyone still masturbates.


From above...
The history of having it done in North America came in large part from Dr. Kellogg who mandated it to prevent masturbation as he had the mistaken notion that sex for anything but procreation was unhealthy...

Kellogg also suggested placing sutures so Erections couldn't happen, AND then for good measure for those naughty girls, carbolic acid applied to the clitoris. He also seemed to recommend Enemas for an awful lot of ailments, including Nymphomania in women, also the removal of the clitoris.

Gunna look at the cereal aisle a lot differently now.

Brit - Uncut

Cut are rare here, fiancee's never tried one, can't say I'd fancy it, kinda attached to mine (awful I know)
 
Uncut vs Cut

I truly suffer from foreskin deprivation! I wish I would have had a voice in the decision to remove my foreskin! I wish i were still intact, and i do believe as a decision to circumcise me as a new born, my cock lost a great deal of sensitivity! Not to mention the more time i would have spent playing with my cock if i had foreskin. Seriously speaking, i do think that we should leave the decision to circumcise penises up to adults! I believe that it is an unnecessary surgery done to boys that deprived them of a part of their body, and they generally have no input as they are newborns!
 
I'm original equipment, uncut. Prefer it that way.
Will never forgive the ex for mutilating our son after birth. -After it being discussed.
I think a lot of sensitivity as well as lubrication when needed is lost with circumcision.
Staying clean is not a problem.
 
I suppose I could be mistaken, but I have never had sex with an uncut guy.
 
I don't think you would, necessarily. I'm uncut and once dated a girl for five months before she realized. When its erect, there is not always much of a difference.
 
Soft

I don't think you would, necessarily. I'm uncut and once dated a girl for five months before she realized. When its erect, there is not always much of a difference.

Did she ever see you soft? I'm sure that there is a distinguishable difference when you are not erect, but I'm speaking from a position of never being in that position?
 
Last edited:
Cut and proud, My wife says I have the perfect dick!
 
Last edited:
Interesting results given that circumcision really is genital mutilation of an infant with zero medical benefit and has some degree of risk involved for the baby.

The history of having it done in North America came in large part from Dr. Kellogg who mandated it to prevent masturbation as he had the mistaken notion that sex for anything but procreation was unhealthy. Despite inventing corn flakes, he was of dubious distinction.

The foreskin is supposed to be there and removing it means a loss of 4 square inches of flesh in an adult male.

Yeah, I'm uncut.

Sorry pal..... it's not "flesh" that's been removed..... it's basically loose skin. If one's dick is shorter than he thinks it should be, it's not because of circumcision.
 
I like either

Question though... how many uncut guys like the foreskin pulled back and their head licked and sucked?
I have had more guys push away than not.... is it jus too sensitive?
 
Sorry pal..... it's not "flesh" that's been removed..... it's basically loose skin. If one's dick is shorter than he thinks it should be, it's not because of circumcision.

We aren't pals. And flesh is loose skin.

It isn't about being shorter.

Also... this is genital mutilation of a child... let's be clear about that.
 
I have a low cut circumcision. So I have enough foreskin left to cover my coronal ridge, making my knob look like an acorn in its cup. Some of my friends have a high cut so that their knobs have a tight wide band formed by the inner surface of their foreskins, which reaches about a third of the way down the shaft. The decision was made for me at birth. There was a view popular at the time that a circumcised cock was easier to keep clean. It seems that most couples decided to go with what the father had done. Still, I'd love to know what my foreskin would have looked like - long or short, fine or thick skinned, tight or loose; and more importantly whether sex and masturbation would have felt any different.
 
Back
Top