Ahusband76
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2019
- Posts
- 111
What do you prefer in your partner and why?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There needs to be a third category: "Either is fine with me."
The world isn't made in black or white. . .
I couldn't agree with you more!
In most cases, the decision/incision is made for men at birth anyway. Hardly fair to penalize a guy for it.![]()
Or one for "who cares"! Cocks are cocks, and I love them all. As long as they shoot cum down my throat and/or up my ass, they are all fine with me.There needs to be a third category: "Either is fine with me."
The world isn't made in black or white. . .
From above...
The history of having it done in North America came in large part from Dr. Kellogg who mandated it to prevent masturbation as he had the mistaken notion that sex for anything but procreation was unhealthy...
Kellogg also suggested placing sutures so Erections couldn't happen, AND then for good measure for those naughty girls, carbolic acid applied to the clitoris. He also seemed to recommend Enemas for an awful lot of ailments, including Nymphomania in women, also the removal of the clitoris.
Gunna look at the cereal aisle a lot differently now.
Brit - Uncut
Cut are rare here, fiancee's never tried one, can't say I'd fancy it, kinda attached to mine (awful I know)
I suppose I could be mistaken, but I have never had sex with an uncut guy.
I don't think you would, necessarily. I'm uncut and once dated a girl for five months before she realized. When its erect, there is not always much of a difference.
Interesting results given that circumcision really is genital mutilation of an infant with zero medical benefit and has some degree of risk involved for the baby.
The history of having it done in North America came in large part from Dr. Kellogg who mandated it to prevent masturbation as he had the mistaken notion that sex for anything but procreation was unhealthy. Despite inventing corn flakes, he was of dubious distinction.
The foreskin is supposed to be there and removing it means a loss of 4 square inches of flesh in an adult male.
Yeah, I'm uncut.
Sorry pal..... it's not "flesh" that's been removed..... it's basically loose skin. If one's dick is shorter than he thinks it should be, it's not because of circumcision.