Weird Harold
Opinionated Old Fart
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2000
- Posts
- 23,768
This subject has come up with a couple of editing jobs.
Should there be a different standard of formatting (paragraph breaks) for text intended only for online viewing than for text intended to be printed?
The question arose from an author who was worried she was over-correcting in response to a criticism that her paragraphs were too long. In considering my response, I realized that I use smaller paragraphs in text I don’t foresee being printed.
I find that a paragraph that is not completely visible on-screen to be intimidating. If there’s no visible beginning or end, I have trouble tracking the lines as I read them.
Consequently, I tend, in my own writings for online consumption, to stay with paragraph lengths of one, three, or five lines, With a double paragraph mark for white space between them. The white space and odd number of lines tends to provide a ‘guideline’ for the eye to follow while reading.
When I checked some letters I wrote intended for printing and mailing, I found I tend to go seven to ten lines before a paragraph break. There isn’t the pattern of predominately odd numbers of lines either.
This isn’t a conscious choice to write longer paragraphs for printing and shorter ones for online. At least, I don’t remember making a conscious choice. It’s habits formed by hours spent typing messages.
I know that it affects the comments I make to editing clients. (For lack of a better term.) I edit with an accent on readability, and in the context of stories for posting online; I tend to favor the short paragraph style I write in. I also stress the value of using dialogue to tell the story instead of dry narration.
MS Word 97 has an ‘online layout’ view as well as a ‘page layout’ view, so I don’t think this is a unique thought.
The question is: Just how important is this concept to the stories we’re editing.
My answer obviously is ‘very important.’ It follows the principle of ‘Know your audience’ to take into consideration the medium in which it will be ‘published’.
Should there be a different standard of formatting (paragraph breaks) for text intended only for online viewing than for text intended to be printed?
The question arose from an author who was worried she was over-correcting in response to a criticism that her paragraphs were too long. In considering my response, I realized that I use smaller paragraphs in text I don’t foresee being printed.
I find that a paragraph that is not completely visible on-screen to be intimidating. If there’s no visible beginning or end, I have trouble tracking the lines as I read them.
Consequently, I tend, in my own writings for online consumption, to stay with paragraph lengths of one, three, or five lines, With a double paragraph mark for white space between them. The white space and odd number of lines tends to provide a ‘guideline’ for the eye to follow while reading.
When I checked some letters I wrote intended for printing and mailing, I found I tend to go seven to ten lines before a paragraph break. There isn’t the pattern of predominately odd numbers of lines either.
This isn’t a conscious choice to write longer paragraphs for printing and shorter ones for online. At least, I don’t remember making a conscious choice. It’s habits formed by hours spent typing messages.
I know that it affects the comments I make to editing clients. (For lack of a better term.) I edit with an accent on readability, and in the context of stories for posting online; I tend to favor the short paragraph style I write in. I also stress the value of using dialogue to tell the story instead of dry narration.
MS Word 97 has an ‘online layout’ view as well as a ‘page layout’ view, so I don’t think this is a unique thought.
The question is: Just how important is this concept to the stories we’re editing.
My answer obviously is ‘very important.’ It follows the principle of ‘Know your audience’ to take into consideration the medium in which it will be ‘published’.