Criminal background checks for gun ownership....OK...BUT

[Busybody]

Obama Regime Says Companies Who Run Background Checks On Potential Employees Are Discriminating Against Minorities, Threatens To Sue…




Via NetRightDaily:


Criminal background checks have become all the rage in Washington, D.C., as politicians scramble to try to ensure that anyone who ever even thought of owning a gun is subjected to a thorough electronic proctology exam.

However, one group that appears immune to background check fever are the ever helpful Obama officials at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP).

The EEOC and OFCCP have each determined that employers who use background checks as one of the determinants of whether to hire a prospective employee may be engaging in prohibited discrimination.

These federal agencies reason that the use of criminal background checks can lead to a disparate impact on minority job applicants. According to these government agencies, in order for an employer to avoid claims that using a criminal background check is discriminatory, they must show that excluding applicants based upon criminal history is job-related and consistent with business necessity.

And the EEOC for its part is threatening lawsuits against companies which employ background checks.

 

[Busybody]

A NIGGER administration

Run by NIGGERS

For NIGGERS

Only for NIGGERS

Fuck all NON NIGGERZ

 

[miles]

Obama Regime Says Companies Who Run Background Checks On Potential Employees Are Discriminating Against Minorities, Threatens To Sue…




Via NetRightDaily:


Criminal background checks have become all the rage in Washington, D.C., as politicians scramble to try to ensure that anyone who ever even thought of owning a gun is subjected to a thorough electronic proctology exam.

However, one group that appears immune to background check fever are the ever helpful Obama officials at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP).

The EEOC and OFCCP have each determined that employers who use background checks as one of the determinants of whether to hire a prospective employee may be engaging in prohibited discrimination.

These federal agencies reason that the use of criminal background checks can lead to a disparate impact on minority job applicants. According to these government agencies, in order for an employer to avoid claims that using a criminal background check is discriminatory, they must show that excluding applicants based upon criminal history is job-related and consistent with business necessity.

And the EEOC for its part is threatening lawsuits against companies which employ background checks.

The Obama insanity continues. This will never fly.

 

[WeedSmoke420]

interesting..

 

[Busybody]

The Obama insanity continues. This will never fly.

really?

who can afford to stand against the Government>

 

[koalabear]

really?

who can afford to stand against the Government>

United we stand...............never mind..

 

[WeedSmoke420]

United we stand...............never mind..

lol..

 

[unregistered]

 

[hogjack]

Will there be waivers available on Criminal Background checks?

1,200 well-connected companies and unions got out of Obama-care with waivers.

 

[Busybody]

The last time we failed to do background checks, Obama got elected to public office.

Scary.

 

[Busybody]

Background checks for law-abiding citizens exercising their Second Amendment rights.

No background checks for criminals seeking employment.

No background checks---or any consequences---for aliens living in the US illegally.

No background checks to ensure that voter rolls are not padded with fake voters.

Got it. Check.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Busybody]

All part of the Obama assault on the civil society. Soon companies threatening to go out of business because of regulation will have their assets seized and their operations nationalized by the state. Creeping communism. Let's call it by it's real name.

bank on it

 

[unregistered]

 

[phrodeau]

Westford Selectmen Withdraw Proposal To Ban Assault Weapons
By Jim Armstrong, WBZ-TV
February 20, 2013 10:10 PM

WESTFORD (CBS) – A thunderous round of applause and a standing ovation greeted the news Wednesday night that a proposed town bylaw to restrict some assault weapons was going to be officially withdrawn.

The overwhelming majority of the close to 400 people who packed a special meeting of the Westford Board of Selectmen opposed the idea.

The man who originally proposed it told the crowd the debate had not gone as he had hoped.

Vice Chairman of the Board of Selectmen Robert Jeffries said, “This was meant to be a discussion within the town of Westford, a community discussion that’s gotten way, way beyond that. We’re not really getting the discussion we want.”

More here:

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2013/02/20/westford-selectman-proposes-ban-on-assault-weapons/

That's no surprise. NRA members have loud mouths.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[phrodeau]

Check this out:

h ttp://us-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=2%5f0%5f0%5f1%5f682631%5fAKDbi2IAAI46USbEygT2TULLFrY&pid=2&fid=Inbox&inline=1&appid=YahooMailNeo

You tried to post a picture from an e-mail? And you actually thought that would work?

 

[WeedSmoke420]

 

[WeedSmoke420]

 

[WeedSmoke420]

 

[sigh]

really?

who can afford to stand against the Government>

Big corporations. They have and they will.

Forget about innocent until proven guilty. I have to pee in a jar to apply for a job.

Yes, yes, yes, I know...that's different.

 

[Busybody]

Big corporations. They have and they will.

.

they don't

they settle for millions and hike prices

THAT ISNT THE POINT, IZ IT?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Big corporations. They have and they will.

Forget about innocent until proven guilty. I have to pee in a jar to apply for a job.

Yes, yes, yes, I know...that's different.

They do not stand against government, they join it (as does the National Press).

When Government gets so powerful that its purchase price is cost effective, even imperative, to business, then business will purchase government indulgences.
A_J, the Stupid

 

[sigh]

They do not stand against government, they join it (as does the National Press).

When Government gets so powerful that its purchase price is cost effective, even imperative, to business, then business will purchase government indulgences.
A_J, the Stupid

Then they will buy an indulgence to sidestep BB's concern.