von_Bismarck
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2003
- Posts
- 6,587
When asked the single-question version, just 18 percent of U.S adults say humans have always existed in their present form, while 81 percent say humans have evolved over time. By contrast, in the two-question approach, nearly one third of respondents (31 percent) say humans have always existed in their present form, and 68 percent say they evolved over time. These results suggest that some Americans who do accept that humans have evolved are reluctant to say so in the two-question approach, perhaps because they are uncomfortable placing themselves on the secular side of a cultural divide.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/how-many-creationists-are-there-in-america/
These numbers appear to be decreasing in time, but for fuck's sake, it's nearly 2020. There shouldn't be a question about the deep time evolutionary explanation for the diversity of species on Earth.
What's interesting is the link between creationism and believing in conspiracy theories.
Teleological explanations for natural phenomena are rejected by scientists because these explanations appeal to intentions. But trees do not grow leaves and rain clouds do not drop water with an outcome in mind. It rains because of physics. And those physics would apply equally if there were no flowers or any other life on the planet.
Take teleology one step further, and you get Donald Trump, who thinks that global warming is an invention of the Chinese to make US manufacturing non-competitive. There is growing evidence that indulging in conspiracy theories predisposes people to reject scientific findings, from climate change to vaccinations and AIDS. And researchers have now found that teleological thinking also links beliefs in conspiracy theories and creationism.
https://m.medicalxpress.com/news/2018-08-psychological-link-conspiracy-theories-creationism.html
Perhaps having a faculty for teleological explanation suited us in prehistoric times, but it is less suitable now. Are these errors in reasoning correctable on a social level?
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/how-many-creationists-are-there-in-america/
These numbers appear to be decreasing in time, but for fuck's sake, it's nearly 2020. There shouldn't be a question about the deep time evolutionary explanation for the diversity of species on Earth.
What's interesting is the link between creationism and believing in conspiracy theories.
Teleological explanations for natural phenomena are rejected by scientists because these explanations appeal to intentions. But trees do not grow leaves and rain clouds do not drop water with an outcome in mind. It rains because of physics. And those physics would apply equally if there were no flowers or any other life on the planet.
Take teleology one step further, and you get Donald Trump, who thinks that global warming is an invention of the Chinese to make US manufacturing non-competitive. There is growing evidence that indulging in conspiracy theories predisposes people to reject scientific findings, from climate change to vaccinations and AIDS. And researchers have now found that teleological thinking also links beliefs in conspiracy theories and creationism.
https://m.medicalxpress.com/news/2018-08-psychological-link-conspiracy-theories-creationism.html
Perhaps having a faculty for teleological explanation suited us in prehistoric times, but it is less suitable now. Are these errors in reasoning correctable on a social level?