Content guideline question bestiality

[StillStunned]

This a cataclysmic derailing and I am purrfectly content to let it canter downwards the spiral of crepuscular mania, caterwauling all the way.

And anyone who complains is just a sourpuss.

 

[Boneryard]

Thank you all for the information. Super helpful. And thank you for the endless puns and whatever the rest of this. If you could throw in some about squirrels - specifically their horrible demise, possibly at the hands furry domesticated predators - it would make my day complete.

 

[StillStunned]

Puns about squirrels? Are you nuts?!

 

[ShelbyDawn57]

Squirrels, ok...

A fox, a squirrel, and an otter
doing things they best not've
t'were furries, you see,
simple, should be
were the squirrel not the foxes daughter

 

[MyBareTorso]

Ha, that's silenced all the yapping! Now roll over and play dead!

Carefully...this thread might get neutered...

 

[Pabiporffor]

Change it to a duck. Duck are fowl and not beasts so aren't covered by beastiality laws. And yes this has been used as an argument in court.

 

[StillStunned]

I reckon the story would still fall afoul of Lit's policy, though.

 

[TheLobster]

I reckon the story would still fall afowl of Lit's policy, though.

Fixed that for ya.

 

[StillStunned]

Fixed that for ya.

That was the joke,

 

[TheLobster]

That was the joke,

Well then, that duck certainly flew over my head.

 

[StillStunned]

That's alright, I won't send you a bill for having to explain it.

 

[M_K_Babalon]

I wouldn't consider that beastiality, not even nipping at what I know the site defines it as, on what it accepts. I ain't really sniffed around there, though, and I don't know any forum reg, that's got a mark in the territory.

As far as I know, it's all supernatural and sentient creatures, that can consent, knot really about roleplaying. You can give it a shot, but if Laurel thinks you're barking up the wrong tree, she'll move it. So if you do, and she does, don't come back shaking ya jowls about it.