Collar me Profiles...am I just crazy?

The picture on that profile is a bit fuzzy. What about it seems not current?
Is it the age that seems off to you? Or something else??
If it's the age ... i would not rule out the possibility of the number he provides as being true.
i know many who look at least a decade less than their actual age.
Maybe it's the height/weight that you question. i'm not very good at judging that type of accuracy. He seems weight/height propotional to me for a man who is over 6' tall.
 
Neomagalie said:
I was thinking I would see something that had the orange glow of late 70s or early 80s or something but no such luck.

He does look younger than 40 but with a fuzzy Polaroid it’s hard to say.

Or do you mean the boxy looking computers?
Ahh ... good eye for detail, Neomagalie.
i hadn't noticed those outdated computers in the background.
Not an indication of false info in itself though (some still use them in settings like offices and stuff where the computer is not used for accessing the internet) ... but i can see how it may raise an eyebrow of suspicion.
 
Neomagalie said:
Well I know that those tables make me think more of schools than work. Also the clock the books laid like that… And most schools have crappy computers.

I would like to know what is the fuzzy pink thing at the bottom and what is with the hands

The first thing i noticed was the fuzziness and then it being a polaroid, WHO USES THOSE???

I'm not really looking at the guy, he very well could be 40, tho he doesn't like it, I was more referring to the computers....

I sent him a message and questioned him...he got offended and said I was being disrespectful and would I like to see his cam??

I don't care if he is or is not 40....Just seems suspicious is all.
 
naughtygirl69s said:
The first thing i noticed was the fuzziness and then it being a polaroid, WHO USES THOSE???

*blush*

*hides polaroid camera*
 
We have a polaroid camera. Plus a new digi camera too. *shrugs*

So, did you view his cam? Seems he was at least making an effort toward offering proof of his identity.
 
Neomagalie said:
Well I know that those tables make me think more of schools than work. Also the clock the books laid like that… And most schools have crappy computers.

I would like to know what is the fuzzy pink thing at the bottom and what is with the hands
Did he say this was a work photo? It does look like a school photo, or some training center.

the computers (and monitors) do look rather old. If I had to date the picture from the computers, I'd say somewhere around 2001, if not befpre. That doesn't mean that is when the picture was taken, because some schools and buinesses don't get new computers that often. And, if it's someplace that has to deal with the government, you need to keep that old stuff, just because the government has that "if it ain't broke, don't replace it" policy, for the most part.

And the company I work at is a VERY large company (with offices in Hong Kong, Paris, the UK, etc.) and most of the desktops here are only Pentiums. That's the first Pentium, I'm talking about. Sure, some departments have very new computers, but for basic access to network programs, email and Internet, companies don't spend much money.

But, those in this picture are very boxy, and look even from the 80386 or 80486 times. But, to give the guy the benefit of the doubt, the whole picture is kind of fuzzy.

Oh, the thing at the bottom of the screen is Polaroid chemical that has oozed from the bottom of the pic, where that little packet is. The hands look like his thumbs are resting on a belt that'd hidden by his shirt. Why is the left hand closed more than the right? He could be left handed and masturbate a lot. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
DVS said:
Did he say this was a work photo? It does look like a school photo, or some training center.

the computers (and monitors) do look rather old. If I had to date the picture from the computers, I'd say somewhere around 2001, if not befpre. That doesn't mean that is when the picture was taken, because some schools and buinesses don't get new computers that often. And, if it's someplace that has to deal with the government, you need to keep that old stuff, just because the government has that "if it ain't broke, don't replace it" policy, for the most part.

And the company I work at is a VERY large company (with offices in Hong Kong, Paris, the UK, etc.) and most of the desktops here are only Pentiums. That's the first Pentium, I'm talking about. Sure, some departments have very new computers, but for basic access to network programs, email and Internet, companies don't spend much money.

But, those in this picture are very boxy, and look even from the 80386 or 80486 times. But, to give the guy the benefit of the doubt, the whole picture is kind of fuzzy.

Oh, the thing at the bottom of the screen is Polaroid chemical that has oozed from the bottom of the pic, where that little packet is. The hands look like his thumbs are resting on a belt that'd hidden by his shirt. Why is the left hand closed more than the right? He could be left handed and masturbate a lot. :rolleyes:

no, he never said where the pic was taken.

hehe, this was awesome....hearing your analysis....when I first looked at the pic, I was thinking 1982:eek:

I haven't viewed his cam....although now I'm curious to, I think he was mad at me for claiming the pic wasn't current. Perhaps I was hasty, I dunno. I feel kinda bad now.
 
Sometimes we are too quick to jump to conclusions, I try to keep my photo current on my profile, it is impossible to keep it exactly current.

My current profile pic is from a few years ago......................
 
INSIDEYOURMIND said:
Sometimes we are too quick to jump to conclusions, I try to keep my photo current on my profile, it is impossible to keep it exactly current.

My current profile pic is from a few years ago......................

aw, very cute, I'm sure you haven't changed a bit! :rolleyes:
 
naughtygirl69s said:
no, he never said where the pic was taken.

hehe, this was awesome....hearing your analysis....when I first looked at the pic, I was thinking 1982:eek:

I haven't viewed his cam....although now I'm curious to, I think he was mad at me for claiming the pic wasn't current. Perhaps I was hasty, I dunno. I feel kinda bad now.
Well, 1982 is a little far back there. Computers weren't that small, then.

the farthest back I'd go would be early or mid 90s, if those were new computers in that picture.

Oh,a nd don't feel bad. Caution is always much better than risky. If he can't understand that, it's his loss.
 
Y'all realize I was a year old in 1982? giggling madly I didn't click on the link 'til today, and the picture has been removed, by the way.
 
snowy ciara said:
Y'all realize I was a year old in 1982? giggling madly I didn't click on the link 'til today, and the picture has been removed, by the way.
You're certain? The picture is still showing for me (or ... never know, maybe it is cacheted/stored somewhere on my PC ... i dunno).
 
I couldn't see a picture, either. I thought maybe it only displayed to members of the site, though? I dunno. :)
 
jadefirefly said:
I couldn't see a picture, either. I thought maybe it only displayed to members of the site, though? I dunno. :)
Correct. If your are not logged on a registered account .... the photo won't show.
 
snowy ciara said:
Y'all realize I was a year old in 1982? giggling madly I didn't click on the link 'til today, and the picture has been removed, by the way.

I was four. lol
 
snowy ciara said:
Y'all realize I was a year old in 1982? giggling madly I didn't click on the link 'til today, and the picture has been removed, by the way.
i was 14 & just starting my freshman year of high school.
 
sinn0cent1 said:
i was 14 & just starting my freshman year of high school.

K was 13. I have entirely too much fun with that. He'll talk about something from that time period, and I'll just remind him that all I remember from that time period was care-bears and she-ra. :devil:

He just shakes his head and says 'God, I'm old.'
 
snowy ciara said:
Y'all realize I was a year old in 1982? giggling madly I didn't click on the link 'til today, and the picture has been removed, by the way.
You know, for someone who's still hobbling around with a bad knee and sore ribs, I wouldn't be giggiling so much. You don't sound like you'd be too difficult to catch.

In 1982 I was 29 years old. That was an excellent time in my life. A lot of sex and the drugs were good, too. I must have had something going for me, because the women didn't mind if we just went to my place (or their place) for sex, on dates. Actaully, we usually went out to get something to eat afterwards, because sex makes you hungry.

I know what it was that I had going for me...I still had HAIR! :D
 
DVS said:
You know, for someone who's still hobbling around with a bad knee and sore ribs, I wouldn't be giggiling so much. You don't sound like you'd be too difficult to catch.

In 1982 I was 29 years old. That was an excellent time in my life. A lot of sex and the drugs were good, too. I must have had something going for me, because the women didn't mind if we just went to my place (or their place) for sex, on dates. Actaully, we usually went out to get something to eat afterwards, because sex makes you hungry.

I know what it was that I had going for me...I still had HAIR! :D

You had hair?

No way. I think you're pulling our legs. I WANT PROOF! :p
 
Back
Top