Cold Crow For The Leftwing Media

The Federal government, in their case against Hunter Biden, declared four separate emails to be authentic. They did not declare all content to be authentic.
The FBI has testified under oath before Congress the laptop is real.
 
The FBI has testified under oath before Congress the laptop is real.
The laptop is real. The FBI has proven this.
The contents of the laptop, which initiated this whole affair, were shown to have been modified sometime after the backup was taken at the repair shop (there were folders on the "Desktop" pointing to all the "good stuff" to incriminate Biden.

We have to assume nefarious intent because the person(s) who adulterated the laptop backup were savvy enough to delete system log entries showing any of these new folders and shortcuts, thus obliterating their digital fingerprints. This is not something a neophyte can do easily.

There were thousands of emails missing header information (transport logs from "Bursima" to Biden). The vast majority of emails were also relayed through Google mail, which further casts doubt on authenticity.

The "Butt Hunters Laptop" affair got what Republicans needed, a "show trial" to "prove" that the other guy does bad stuff too. They couldn't touch President Joe Biden, so they settled for his sont.
 
The FBI has testified under oath before Congress the laptop is real.
Yes, they did. They did not testify under oath that all content on the laptop is authentic because they only wanted/needed to prove four emails were.

I have a laptop. You can authenticate that the laptop is mine. You cannot say that this means that all content on the laptop was put there by me.

You can certainly, as the government has done here, authenticate specific data.
 

The laptop is real. The FBI has proven this.
The contents of the laptop, which initiated this whole affair, were shown to have been modified sometime after the backup was taken at the repair shop (there were folders on the "Desktop" pointing to all the "good stuff" to incriminate Biden.
That isn't true;

FBI ‘verified’ authenticity of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop in November 2019: IRS whistleblower
Story by Steven Nelson


WASHINGTON — The FBI “verified” the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop in November 2019 and a federal computer expert assessed “it was not manipulated in any way,” IRS supervisory agent Gary Shapley told Congress in explosive testimony released Thursday.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...n-november-2019-irs-whistleblower/ar-AA1cU3Iu
 
Last edited:
That isn't true;

FBI ‘verified’ authenticity of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop in November 2019: IRS whistleblower
Story by Steven Nelson


ASHINGTON — The FBI “verified” the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop in November 2019 and a federal computer expert assessed “it was not manipulated in any way,” IRS supervisory agent Gary Shapley told Congress in explosive testimony released Thursday.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...n-november-2019-irs-whistleblower/ar-AA1cU3Iu
Now his dad will never become President!
 
There were some 2000 emails without headers planted on the laptop, most likely by the Russian hackers. Nothing to see here, move along folks.

What has Harlan Crow got to do with it? Isn't he busy bribing Supreme Court Justices?
 

FLASHBACK: Remember When MSNBC’s Morning Joe Mocked the Hunter Biden Laptop as Russian Disinformation? (VIDEO)​

By Mike LaChance Jun. 16, 2024 7:00 am


This is but one example of why few believe a word the legacy media says.

🙄

One more time for the slow kids:

From a Washington Post story:

“What the New York Post got was apparently a copy of that hard drive, made by the owner of the repair shop, John Paul Mac Isaac. He’d tipped off the FBI about the device and, as the 2020 election neared without word of any federal investigation, also contacted Trump’s attorney, Rudy Giuliani. Giuliani was the conduit to the New York Post — after pitching it to Fox News, which passed.”

😳

Other news outlets were not given access to the material at the time of the initial report. (Giuliani told the New York Times he was worried its journalists would “spend all the time they could to try to contradict it before they put it out.”) When The Washington Post finally got access to the material in 2022, we were able to verify some of it as authentic. There was also evidence, though, that the material on the hard drive that went from Giuliani to the New York Post was moved around with some information added. Even Mac Isaac warned that material being attributed to “the laptop” was not on the laptop when he undertook the file recovery process.”

😳

“At trial, government witnesses confirmed that what they had was the original laptop and material from Hunter Biden’s iCloud account. But that was only one fork of the flow of that information to the public. The other was the copy that ended up with Giuliani, and in the press. There may have been another, earlier fork, too; Time magazine reported soon after the initial New York Post story that material attributed to Hunter Biden was being offered in Ukraine in 2019, perhaps after his Apple account had been illegally accessed.”

😳

😑

👉 "Right"guide 🤣

🇺🇸
 
🙄

One more time for the slow kids:

From a Washington Post story:

“What the New York Post got was apparently a copy of that hard drive, made by the owner of the repair shop, John Paul Mac Isaac. He’d tipped off the FBI about the device and, as the 2020 election neared without word of any federal investigation, also contacted Trump’s attorney, Rudy Giuliani. Giuliani was the conduit to the New York Post — after pitching it to Fox News, which passed.”

😳

Other news outlets were not given access to the material at the time of the initial report. (Giuliani told the New York Times he was worried its journalists would “spend all the time they could to try to contradict it before they put it out.”) When The Washington Post finally got access to the material in 2022, we were able to verify some of it as authentic. There was also evidence, though, that the material on the hard drive that went from Giuliani to the New York Post was moved around with some information added. Even Mac Isaac warned that material being attributed to “the laptop” was not on the laptop when he undertook the file recovery process.”

😳

“At trial, government witnesses confirmed that what they had was the original laptop and material from Hunter Biden’s iCloud account. But that was only one fork of the flow of that information to the public. The other was the copy that ended up with Giuliani, and in the press. There may have been another, earlier fork, too; Time magazine reported soon after the initial New York Post story that material attributed to Hunter Biden was being offered in Ukraine in 2019, perhaps after his Apple account had been illegally accessed.”

😳

😑

👉 "Right"guide 🤣

🇺🇸
So tough to get nuanced coverage of facts when your sources include PJs. Gateway, and the rest of the basement bloggers who clearly have Wrong Guide convinced what they are pushing is factual.

What other sites has Daddy Vlady taken you to see? Or has it been all a closeup of him? @Rightguide
 
Back
Top