OLD EUROPE'S LAST HURRAH
By DICK MORRIS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
February 18, 2003 --
THE objection of France and Germany to acting on the obvious necessity of disarming and dismantling Saddam Hussein's regime is not the first breath of a new age of peace but the last hurrah for fading powers seeking to throw around a weight they don't have.
It is quite like the Suez Crisis of 1956, when Britain and France felt they could go it alone and, without even informing the United States until the last minute, launched a pre-emptive attack, allied with Israel, against Egypt. Their goal was to recover the Suez Canal, which the Egyptian dictator Gamal Nasser had seized.
The two powers met initial military success - but soon found themselves isolated on the global stage as President Dwight Eisenhower, outraged, threw his lot in with the Soviet Union in demanding a cease-fire and pullback. The lesson, apparently lost on France, was that neither nation still had the clout to go it alone without U.S. backing.
The two nations experienced decades of impotence after Suez. The same will be the legacy of France's and Germany's last stand against America's Iraq policy.
[SNIP!]
Why are the French and the Germans walking into this trap? For the same reason Britain and France did in Suez: Ego and an inability to perceive how the world had changed. Just as London and Paris in 1956 did not grasp that global politics had become bi-polar, Paris and Berlin today do not now grasp that it is uni-polar.
In both cases, the powers of the old regime reflexively acted on past assumptions before their irrelevancy was brutally brought home to them.
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/54641.htm
THE NEW YORK POST
By DICK MORRIS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
February 18, 2003 --
THE objection of France and Germany to acting on the obvious necessity of disarming and dismantling Saddam Hussein's regime is not the first breath of a new age of peace but the last hurrah for fading powers seeking to throw around a weight they don't have.
It is quite like the Suez Crisis of 1956, when Britain and France felt they could go it alone and, without even informing the United States until the last minute, launched a pre-emptive attack, allied with Israel, against Egypt. Their goal was to recover the Suez Canal, which the Egyptian dictator Gamal Nasser had seized.
The two powers met initial military success - but soon found themselves isolated on the global stage as President Dwight Eisenhower, outraged, threw his lot in with the Soviet Union in demanding a cease-fire and pullback. The lesson, apparently lost on France, was that neither nation still had the clout to go it alone without U.S. backing.
The two nations experienced decades of impotence after Suez. The same will be the legacy of France's and Germany's last stand against America's Iraq policy.
[SNIP!]
Why are the French and the Germans walking into this trap? For the same reason Britain and France did in Suez: Ego and an inability to perceive how the world had changed. Just as London and Paris in 1956 did not grasp that global politics had become bi-polar, Paris and Berlin today do not now grasp that it is uni-polar.
In both cases, the powers of the old regime reflexively acted on past assumptions before their irrelevancy was brutally brought home to them.
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/54641.htm
THE NEW YORK POST