Clarification on Beastialty

ansel1

Virgin
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Posts
3
My question is simply (after reading the guide lines) Its ok to write about a person and a unicorn, but not a person and a horse? seems silly but I thought I would ask.
 
My question is simply (after reading the guide lines) Its ok to write about a person and a unicorn, but not a person and a horse? seems silly but I thought I would ask.
Unicorns are not horses with a horn. They have a whole different and quite complex mythology.
 
Depending on where you look unicorns have many different possible forms. They are most often described as horse like or goat like. I believe most people assume its a magical beast that has most of the attributes of a horse. I was drawing a parallel with that in mind. A horse is a horse so to speak. I guess its all in how you imagine it/them. I read a popular fantasy series where unicorns were every color possible, made musical sounds with their horns, and could shape shift into a human form. They were capable of procreating in either form.
 
I think you are asking why the one and not the other. If that’s the case, then intelligence, per GC, might be the reason, that horses (like children) cannot give real consent because they cannot truly understand in advance.

Another reason is that there is a massive power imbalance between a human and a domesticated animal. Same-same with adults and children, which is another reason pedophilia is a major No-No.

A third reason, perhaps a more cynical one, is that unicorns are imaginary. If real unicorns were to be seen roaming the plains and forests, I suspect Literotica might well bar sunmissions about human/unicorn sex, too.

Bottom line is that, on Lit, humans can do the deed with unicorns but not horses, mermaids but not manatees, werewolves but not wolves or dogs and so forth.
 
Last edited:
I think you are asking why the one and not the other. If that’s the case, then intelligence, per GC, might be the reason, that horses (like children) cannot give real consent because they cannot truly understand in advance.

Another reason is that there is a massive power imbalance between a human and a domesticated animal. Same-same with adults and children, which is another reason pedophilia is a major No-No.

A third reason, perhaps a more cynical one, is that unicorns are imaginary. If real unicorns were to be seen roaming the plains and forests, I suspect Literotica might well bar sunmissions about human/unicorn sex, too.

Bottom line is that, on Lit, humans can do the deed with unicorns but not horses, mermaids but not manatees, werewolves but not wolves or dogs and so forth.
Thank you for your reply. You have clarified my understanding. The power imbalance was what clarified it. Thank you again.
 
A third reason, perhaps a more cynical one, is that unicorns are imaginary. If real unicorns were to be seen roaming the plains and forests, I suspect Literotica might well bar sunmissions about human/unicorn sex, too.

I think this has a lot to do with it. If somebody reads a Literotica story about fucking horses, and then gets caught fucking a horse IRL and blames it on Literotica's influence, that could draw unwelcome attention. With unicorns that's not likely to be an issue.

Same principle might explain why Literotica is a bit more open to stories about vampires/demons/etc. killing people during sex than it is with a human doing it.
 
I think this has a lot to do with it. If somebody reads a Literotica story about fucking horses, and then gets caught fucking a horse IRL and blames it on Literotica's influence, that could draw unwelcome attention. With unicorns that's not likely to be an issue.

Same principle might explain why Literotica is a bit more open to stories about vampires/demons/etc. killing people during sex than it is with a human doing it.
Point.
 
There probably aren't laws forbidding sexual relationships with unicorns, although nothing would surprise me.
 
Back
Top