Circumcision....discuss?

Circumcised.
My cousin was not.

Mine looked way better.
His looked like an earthworm in a turtleneck.
 
Is it even possible to make? I imagine it would be a lot more complex to have realistic skin that moves, and lasts a long time without wearing out. it doesn't seem very economical to me.

Besides, do many women actually get pleasure from a foreskin? :confused:
 
How is that a good point??

Why would a dildo be "uncut" if it gives no extra pleasure to the person using it? It doesn't make sense.
 
TumbledLove said:
How is that a good point??

Why would a dildo be "uncut" if it gives no extra pleasure to the person using it? It doesn't make sense.

it's a good point because:

a) circumcized penii are widely considered more aesthetically pleasing

and b) because I made it.
 
It was stupid point. Unless the foreskin is functional, there'd be no reason to make it. and I doubt it could be made to look real or feel real anyway. Why would a company waste their time with a product that would either suck, or be so complicated that it costs too much money.
 
TumbledLove said:
It was stupid point. Unless the foreskin is functional, there'd be no reason to make it. and I doubt it could be made to look real or feel real anyway. Why would a company waste their time with a product that would either suck, or be so complicated that it costs too much money.

You're proving my point.
There is no market for an uncut penis because NOBODY LIKES THEM!

They look ridiculous and have all the sexual allure of an empty sweater sleeve.

Trust me, if the demand was there for a floppy wang dildo, companies would find a way to manufacture them.
 
Awful Arthur said:
Just my personal opinion but I think it depends on the length of foreskin. If there is a lot of foreskin, I think it makes sense to have it removed. I have know grown men who had it done because they had so much foreskin that it interferred with sex and was a hygeine problem.

I have never been circumcised but my foreskin doesn't even cover half the head of my cock. It keeps the glans sensitive but completely disappears upon erection. I wouldn't think of having it removed.

AA

How does the length of his foreskin have any relevance in anything? If anything, it's more for him to enjoy. The length of one's foreskin would not inhibit hygiene no more so than one with a short foreskin.

The average male foreskin retracts upon erection but that isn't to say there is anything wrong with a longer or shorter foreskin. Variety is the spice of life.

Not to mention, a man with a long foreskin would have been admired by the ancient Greeks and Romans.
 
breakwall said:
There is no market for an uncut penis because NOBODY LIKES THEM!

Wrong. There's no demand, because it doesn't add any pleasure for the person using it.

Why are you focused on what a dildo looks like??

The function of a dildo is to *fuck*, not look pretty.

I seriously doubt many women get any pleasure from a foreskin. So it's no surprise whatsoever that there's no demand for it.

If women got pleasure from foreskin, then the demand would be there.
 
Last edited:
breakwall said:
You're proving my point.
There is no market for an uncut penis because NOBODY LIKES THEM!

They look ridiculous and have all the sexual allure of an empty sweater sleeve.

Trust me, if the demand was there for a floppy wang dildo, companies would find a way to manufacture them.


Approximately 80% of the worlds men are intact. So, some people out there must be enjoying their complete sexual organs.

Some of the most popular pornography stars working today, are intact.



Trust me, if the demand was there for a floppy wang dildo, companies would find a way to manufacture them.

http://www.adultsexinc.com/0449000158.Lukas-Bel-Ami.jpg

http://www.xxxfreesexchat.com/SE/SE0/0300_01.JPG

http://www.naturalinstinct.co.uk/files/file1777.jpg

http://207.67.235.67/images2/2200.jpg
 
I'll be damned. a functioning foreskin dildo. I must have one. :D

(bet they're not cheap though; or rather, I bet they cost more than a 'normal' dildo)

I still seriously doubt they give any real extra pleasure for the fuckie.
 
Ok, so I must add something to this..

Angel said:
My comment was rude, and uncalled for, nevermind.
I shower with my daughter on a regular basis. She's 5. If i had a son I would see nothing wrong with it. It's Daddy! Either way, You do have a valid point Angel.
 
This is like listening to a bunch of blind guys arguing about whether Matisse was a better painter than Van Gogh.
 
TumbledLove said:
Wrong. There's no demand, because it doesn't add any pleasure for the person using it.

Why are you focused on what a dildo looks like??

The function of a dildo is to *fuck*, not look pretty.

I seriously doubt many women get any pleasure from a foreskin. So it's no surprise whatsoever that there's no demand for it.

If women got pleasure from foreskin, then the demand would be there.

You haven't got a clue.

Pages and pages of dildos. Every colour of the rainbow. Everything from glass to wood to latex to plastic to metal to ceramic. Every size, every shape. Different curves, angles and dimensions. Some with balls, some with fake hair, some that vibrate, some that twist, move, twitch, warm up, cool down, buzz, wash dishes, double as ball point pens...

The function of a dildo is to satisfy the needs of those who use it, aesthetically and physically.

If women thought uncut dildos were aesthetically pleasing, Dildos 'R" Us would have walls of them.

There have been entire threads on this forum about women gushing over (heh) glass dildos. Why? Do they FEEL any better than any other kind of fake dong? Nope. Do they bring women to mind-blowing orgasms better than other kinds? Nope.
Then WHAT, pray tell, is the attraction?

THEY LOOK COOL!
 
There is no market for an uncut penis because NOBODY LIKES THEM!

Men in Africa feel the same way about intact women.

You have to understand that coming from a society that practices genital mutilations, the normal penis would be foreign to American women. That, compounded by the misinformation and discrimination of the normal penis would lead a shallow, ignorant person to have a negative view of a normal body part.

The reality is that, if a women were sexually secure with herself she would obviously prefer the normal anatomy. The intact penis is designed for sex. A skinless, scarred keratinized penis is not.
 
Queersetti said:
This is like listening to a bunch of blind guys arguing about whether Matisse was a better painter than Van Gogh.

as an owner/operator, I think I have a valid viewpoint.

Mine is in pretty good condition. Barely used...dammit.
 
What do Doctors recommend?

Some of you may know of Dr. Dean Edell, a radio talk show host. He is a Jewish physician who is adamantly against circumcision as a routine surgery and has been actively arguing against it in both the medical and the public forums. A variety of articles on the subject are available at Healthcentral.com. The following link is a recent article concerning a study of circumcision as it relates to a womans pleasure. I'm a new member and have just begun to post so I hope it's not taboo to post the link. Yes, for the curious, I am uncircumcised (country doctor) and so were my forefathers and neither is my son. I have never had an infection and maintain good hygiene ("It's mine and I'll wash it as often and as fast as I want to.")

Hope this adds something to a complex dialogue.

http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/deanfulltexttopics.cfm?ID=60750&storytype=DeanTopics
 
gogonslord said:
Men in Africa feel the same way about intact women.

You have to understand that coming from a society that practices genital mutilations, the normal penis would be foreign to American women. That, compounded by the misinformation and discrimination of the normal penis would lead a shallow, ignorant person to have a negative view of a normal body part.

The reality is that, if a women were sexually secure with herself she would obviously prefer the normal anatomy. The intact penis is designed for sex. A skinless, scarred keratinized penis is not.

yeah yeah, and everyone talks about pheromones, but go to a bar and don't wear deodorant. The only thing flocking to you like flies will actually be the flies.
 
gogonslord said:
The reality is that, if a women were sexually secure with herself she would obviously prefer the normal anatomy.

Congratulations, that is the single stupidest comment in a thread that is brimming with stupid comments.
 
breakwall said:
You haven't got a clue.
And you're still harping on what they look like. You need to get off the "ugly" aspect, because there are certainly woman who disagree with you. You can't say NOBODY likes them, or even the minority likes them, because as a previous poster said, we live in the USA, where deformed penises is the norm.

The primary function, above all else, is to thrust in an out. and a dildo with moving skin is way more complex than a regular one. I mean, a moving sheath of thin skin, that won't tear or get worn out after repeated usage? come on, that's gotta be a major challenge to create.
 
breakwall said:
yeah yeah, and everyone talks about pheromones, but go to a bar and don't wear deodorant. The only thing flocking to you like flies will actually be the flies.

Amazing.
 
Back
Top