Colleen Thomas
Ultrafemme
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2002
- Posts
- 21,545
McKenna said:I can see your point, Colly, though I was a little leery when you mentioned stereotypes. I am afraid of using an occupation as a descriptor precisely because of the stereotypes attached to it. Then again... it might be a challenge to portray a character with a stereotypical career, but write his or her personality in direct contrast to the stereotype. Hmmm... that could be fun.
If I say CPA, I don't have to give you a laundry list that includes, good with mnumbers, meticulous, exacting, or highly educated. You can infer from her occupation she is all of these things. Stereotype was a bad word choice on my part, it's become quite unpallatable and has a lot of connotation I didn't intend.
Pre conceptions would probably have been a better fit. Certain occupations come with preconceptions that are generally accepted. I don't have to tell you my theoretical astrophisicist is socially awkward. He dosen't have to be, but if I write him that way, the reader dosen't get pulled form the story and do a doubletake. By his occupation, they are preconsitioned to be comfortable with him being certain things. I can write him against type of course, but in doing so, his occupation still has weight as a counter reference. I've cast him as singular, without having to spend paragraphs of telling to do so.
You're one smart cookie.
Especially the reference to "desk monkey".