Liar
now with 17% more class
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Posts
- 43,715
Reporter excellence Ryszard Kapuscinski (However that is properly spelled...maybe Senna can assist me there?) held a seminar at my college this week. It was an experience to hear the words of a writer whose work I have enjoyed and admired for years, and hear what he had to say about a wide range of subjects. The process of writing, his thoughts on journalism, the media development and his experience as quite a poetic prose-weaver.
One of the things he talked about was the power of semantic abduction. The way a writer, if he's good, can get away with pretty much anything. He encouraged us to make an experiment to try this literary device out for ourselves.
Here's what he said, roughly paraphrased:
I thought it was a cool odea. Here's a quick attempt at it from me:
The mother held the candle close, chided him quietly for his stupidity, while brushing the dirt of his sore knees. The candle just needed a minute of comfort and rest before restlessness pulled him towards friends and adventure and danger again. His friends were making noise outside. The two tall candles and the short, pudgy one with the cap. The mother gave the bruised spots a last pre-flight check and let go, and the candle rushed out into the street, hollering at his friends and squinting up at the tortrous mid day sun. Candles never seem to be bothered by that like the rest of us, for some reason.
And here's the challenge:
Abduct a word, write a poem. Or a flash fiction prose. Or anything. Any shape and form. Post it here.
That's it.
One of the things he talked about was the power of semantic abduction. The way a writer, if he's good, can get away with pretty much anything. He encouraged us to make an experiment to try this literary device out for ourselves.
Here's what he said, roughly paraphrased:
First take a word. Any mundane word, preferrably a noun, an object.
Then use it as if it was another word. The word you use and the word you mean may have some kind of metonymic or metaphoric connection, like "sportscar" and "stallion". But that's not nessecary. In fact, it's better if the connection is not too obvious. It's in fact not a metaphor, you don't try to transfer one object's properties unto another. You merely steal the word.
Write a text, an essay, a short fiction story, a poem. And use this word switching consistently through the text. If you do it well, and center your text around this object, you might be able to abduct the word. If you succeed, a reader will succumb to your new definition of the word, and believe in it, until he lets go of the text.
I thought it was a cool odea. Here's a quick attempt at it from me:
The mother held the candle close, chided him quietly for his stupidity, while brushing the dirt of his sore knees. The candle just needed a minute of comfort and rest before restlessness pulled him towards friends and adventure and danger again. His friends were making noise outside. The two tall candles and the short, pudgy one with the cap. The mother gave the bruised spots a last pre-flight check and let go, and the candle rushed out into the street, hollering at his friends and squinting up at the tortrous mid day sun. Candles never seem to be bothered by that like the rest of us, for some reason.
And here's the challenge:
Abduct a word, write a poem. Or a flash fiction prose. Or anything. Any shape and form. Post it here.
That's it.