Case proven. Nuff said :)

[stickygirl]

In most of the porn vids the trans women still have their testicles, indeed it's rare to see them without. I read somewhere that men prefer their trans woman to be without, as though somehow, subconsciously, her nuts presented a threat and that if she'd had an orchieoctomy it was kinda proof she was no longer 'a man'. All nonsense when it comes to a definition of course, but I'm curious if there's a preference among trans lovers.

Since this is a question of preference not opinion, then your response shouldn't be open to judgement, any more than people showing a preference to apples over oranges.

( For clarification, if a trans woman has testes then she would normally have to take an androgen blocker, such as spirolactone, as well as estrogen in order to promote female physical characteristics. In my book, more pills = more side effects and I was glad to be shot of them.)

 

[Escierto]

I laughed reading this post. OMG, they want her neutered so she is no longer a threat to their delicate masculinity.

Speaking for myself, my girlfriend doesn’t take any hormones at all and I am perfectly happy with her as she is. Even when she sprouts facial hair, I still see her as the woman she is.

The fact is many cis women have some “masculine” characteristics, whether it’s their voice, the presence of facial hair, their body build etc. Personally I have always found androgynous people very attractive so maybe it’s just me and I am the least qualified person here to offer an opinion

 

[SissySalina]

Am not a Trans but a sissy now without testicles. Not having them makes this sissy feel more feminine and therefore act more feminine. This feeling is carried over to satisfying the needs of men and therefore makes a better sissy. Have enjoyed the pleasure of providing services to men that utilized sissy before the removal of the testicles and most have noted a difference in sissy since removal which they enjoyed. Not having the testicles has been a dream of sissy for many years and finally came to reality thanks to Her.

As stated sissy is a sissy and not a trans and the above is the opinion of this sissy. As for preference of this sissy it is overwhelmingly not having testicles.

 

[OdinElder]

Never been with a trans woman, but if I had the opportunity I would definitely want her to have her balls, as I would want her cum

 

[stickygirl]

I realise this is maybe a weird thread question but your replies have already surprised me. Thanks

 

[BrokenQuill]

I have never had the pleasure of being with a trans woman. I think I would prefer them to be with balls, but much of it would depend on the person and personality in the end.

 

[Escierto]

I realise this is maybe a weird thread question but your replies have already surprised me. Thanks

Why are you surprised? In what way?

 

[2tallpaul]

Am not a Trans but a sissy now without testicles. Not having them makes this sissy feel more feminine and therefore act more feminine. This feeling is carried over to satisfying the needs of men and therefore makes a better sissy. Have enjoyed the pleasure of providing services to men that utilized sissy before the removal of the testicles and most have noted a difference in sissy since removal which they enjoyed. Not having the testicles has been a dream of sissy for many years and finally came to reality thanks to Her.

As stated sissy is a sissy and not a trans and the above is the opinion of this sissy. As for preference of this sissy it is overwhelmingly not having testicles.

Two years on hormones and pieces shrink. I'm losing mine so the hormones work better. Sex is great and I climax more anally than I ever did with intercourse. It's not for everyone but the ones I've been around that have, love it.

 

[2tallpaul]

I laughed reading this post. OMG, they want her neutered so she is no longer a threat to their delicate masculinity.

Speaking for myself, my girlfriend doesn’t take any hormones at all and I am perfectly happy with her as she is. Even when she sprouts facial hair, I still see her as the woman she is.

The fact is many cis women have some “masculine” characteristics, whether it’s their voice, the presence of facial hair, their body build etc. Personally I have always found androgynous people very attractive so maybe it’s just me and I am the least qualified person here to offer an opinion

She's blessed with a small Asian frame what you've shown in your posts. There are no right answers that fit all applications. I will be the first to say the delicate masculinity is an issue and if they think you are doing the wife, that's definitely a possibility. My lady has shared me with some of her bulls and most ask about a fully sissified look. Bikinis work better or riding a bike. But that's not the first thing I ride.

 

[Escierto]

She's blessed with a small Asian frame what you've shown in your posts. There are no right answers that fit all applications. I will be the first to say the delicate masculinity is an issue and if they think you are doing the wife, that's definitely a possibility. My lady has shared me with some of her bulls and most ask about a fully sissified look. Bikinis work better or riding a bike. But that's not the first thing I ride.

True. That’s why I said I am probably the least qualified to offer an opinion. She does have a small frame but she also has facial hair and a receding hairline. Nevertheless, she’s my beauty.

 

[stickygirl]

Why are you surprised? In what way?

Different sides of the same fence? I dunno, I suppose because I am 100% happy with the route I took I can't understand why a trans woman would want to keep them, especially if they are taking anti-androgens long term. I know a girl who couldn't have full lower surgery and elected for an orchie as being the next best thing, because it meant she could revert back to estrogen only.

Then it's interesting to see what guys think too. I wonder if it's because with-nuts is what is shown in porn 99% of the time so that's the norm? But then that loops back to why the women decide to keep them? Does the industry encourage them to keep them, because financially it's a safe bet? So many questions ?!

ETA
I suppose my concern is that they're popping pills to present a body style to tick the industry boxes.

 

[comegently]

As far as porn is concerned, with carries more value in general than without.
For what it's worth, I still have mine but I'm not a porn actress.
Having them is quite annoying sometimes, as when I have to tuck them, but surgery scares me and tucking gets easier with practice.
My own preference, if having sex with a Trans woman, is probably without, unless, of course, I can be penetrated too.

 

[Escierto]

Different sides of the same fence? I dunno, I suppose because I am 100% happy with the route I took I can't understand why a trans woman would want to keep them, especially if they are taking anti-androgens long term. I know a girl who couldn't have full lower surgery and elected for an orchie as being the next best thing, because it meant she could revert back to estrogen only.

Then it's interesting to see what guys think too. I wonder if it's because with-nuts is what is shown in porn 99% of the time so that's the norm? But then that loops back to why the women decide to keep them? Does the industry encourage them to keep them, because financially it's a safe bet? So many questions ?!

I have noticed some transgender social media personalities like Rose Montoya coming out in favor of keeping their genitalia intact. It may be they are outliers like my girlfriend who has always been happy with her body. Of course even she opted for implants which she says gave her confidence as a woman.

So maybe that’s all that matters: whatever gives someone confidence as a woman.

 

[2tallpaul]

Different sides of the same fence? I dunno, I suppose because I am 100% happy with the route I took I can't understand why a trans woman would want to keep them, especially if they are taking anti-androgens long term. I know a girl who couldn't have full lower surgery and elected for an orchie as being the next best thing, because it meant she could revert back to estrogen only.

Then it's interesting to see what guys think too. I wonder if it's because with-nuts is what is shown in porn 99% of the time so that's the norm? But then that loops back to why the women decide to keep them? Does the industry encourage them to keep them, because financially it's a safe bet? So many questions ?!

I've been around quite a few and transitioning only helps by removing. Professionally in the porn industry I can see the need for enlargements, all for the sake of video.

 

[stickygirl]

I've been around quite a few and transitioning only helps by removing. Professionally in the porn industry I can see the need for enlargements, all for the sake of video.

I've seen your posts for ages, but never understood your involvement. So are you saying, in your experience, that removal is a benefit to the transitioning individual?
From what you're saying and my own limited experience it seems there are two pathways here: either in the porn industry or not

ETA my last sentence is garbage. I'm looking at it now and can't even remember what I meant. Soz

 

[Escierto]

I've seen your posts for ages, but never understood your involvement. So are you saying, in your experience, that removal is a benefit to the transitioning individual?
From what you're saying and my own limited experience it seems there are two pathways here: either in the porn industry or not

Are you actually saying that any transgender woman who keeps her genitalia intact is in the porn industry??? Please tell me that I misunderstood your last sentence.

 

[stickygirl]

Are you actually saying that any transgender woman who keeps her genitalia intact is in the porn industry??? Please tell me that I misunderstood your last sentence.

No, not at all!! I'm sorry if I made that ambiguous.
I'm still trying to figure things out, but ... how to explain better?
From what 2TP has noticed, the porn industry may discourage trans women from having an orchie. Many trans women gain some benefit from having that procedure. At any point, they are both trans women.

If this were reduced to Venn diagram there would be lots of overlaps. There is no right or wrong, only observations and trends.

If the porn industry, through financial inducement were encouraging a particular choice, then that ought to prompt questions, but as I have no evidence, it's purely conjecture.

I guess that's the point I'm making - that I'm suspicious of the porn industry introducing a bias into the decisions those women make with their bodies. I can't help but be sceptical of the industry's motives ie $. The individual actors may be happy to go the $ route because it means more financial reward in the short term but...

 

[Escierto]

No, not at all!! I'm sorry if I made that ambiguous.
I'm still trying to figure things out, but ... how to explain better?
From what 2TP has noticed, the porn industry may discourage trans women from having an orchie. Many trans women gain some benefit from having that procedure. At the end, they are both trans women.

If this were reduced to Venn diagram there would be lots of overlaps. There is no right or wrong, only observations and trends.

If the porn industry, through financial inducement were encouraging a particular choice, then that ought to prompt questions, but as I have no evidence, it's purely conjecture.

My own limited experience with the Filipina transgender women that my girlfriend knows is this. They are influenced by what they can afford! Most of them can afford hormones especially since they buy them cheaply from people who import them from Thailand. Very few can afford any kind of surgery. Only with my help at the age of 36 could my girlfriend get the implants that she had always dreamed of having. Most of them are hairdressers or manicurists but some work in call centers if their English is good.

Finally, do you really think the typical transgender woman is influenced in her choices regarding transition by the depiction of transgender women in porn? I doubt that this is true but who knows really?

 

[stickygirl]

Finally, do you really think the typical transgender woman is influenced in her choices regarding transition by the depiction of transgender women in porn? I doubt that this is true but who knows really?

That is the 64 million dollar question. Who is going to advocate for an already marginalised group, when the choice is either paying for a roof over your head or having a healthier lifestyle? Not actually a choice is it?

 

[2tallpaul]

I've seen your posts for ages, but never understood your involvement. So are you saying, in your experience, that removal is a benefit to the transitioning individual?
From what you're saying and my own limited experience it seems there are two pathways here: either in the porn industry or not

I've been around several transitioning and wanting better results of the hormones without. The porn industry like the media paints a different concept of transitioning than what is going on. Not trying to separate or create more titles, but people trapped in the wrong bodies.

I work with a 23 year old that could be a model and I don't lift up her skirt to see what's below. She's quite happy in who she is and she was born a male. I don't whisper behind her back what she has or hasn't and the people she works around don't know the difference.

There is a difference between sex and being sexual and what people want to obtain. In my case, the more fem I became the more I wanted. My family and friends knew it before I did. So with, or without, that's a personal choice. Mine are to be removed for the value of hormones. the penis has shrunk and is useless for erections but I'm leaving it, for now, as the reconstructive damage is more than I care for.

The breast development from hormones has been incredible so there is very little need for implants. I guess there is more to it than images of porn. Photoshop can do more damage to the self esteem than about anything.

I do my best to be supportive with any choices made on lit.

 

[sarod]

In most of the porn vids the trans women still have their testicles, indeed it's rare to see them without. I read somewhere that men prefer their trans woman to be without, as though somehow, subconsciously, her nuts presented a threat and that if she'd had an orchieoctomy it was kinda proof she was no longer 'a man'. All nonsense when it comes to a definition of course, but I'm curious if there's a preference among trans lovers.

Since this is a question of preference not opinion, then your response shouldn't be open to judgement, any more than people showing a preference to apples over oranges.

( For clarification, if a trans woman has testes then she would normally have to take an androgen blocker, such as spirolactone, as well as estrogen in order to promote female physical characteristics. In my book, more pills = more side effects and I was glad to be shot of them.)

hogwash, nuts seal the deal for me

 

[sarod]

if I was to fuck with a trans, she better be fully functional, there will be balls swinging, lots of cum, mine and hers both. She better be able to produce some yummy ball milk for me to taste and recieve as a facial!

 

[SissySalina]

As stated before sissy is a sissy and not Trans. Sissy was a CD that wanted to dress full time and made a deal with Her to become Her sissy in order to be allowed to dress all the time. Sissy dresses because of the way it makes sissy feel inside. Over the years sissy tucked and liked the way it made sissy feel to be smoothed down there, that is the reason sissy wished to have that stuff removed, for the way it made sissy feel.

Sissy will not judge why others have that stuff removed but the decision to have it removed is very personal and one way. In porn it looks good to have those floppy things moving around but that does not tell how that person actually feels about them being there. Lots of things on film are for show in order to make it more exciting for the audience. As an actress in film they must consider the effect things have on the audience and not how they really feel about it, that is their job and occupation.

So do not make any decisions based on how it looks in films especially porn.

This is the sole opinion of this sissy.

 

[jakie69]

Two years on hormones and pieces shrink. I'm losing mine so the hormones work better. Sex is great and I climax more anally than I ever did with intercourse. It's not for everyone but the ones I've been around that have, love it.

I’ve had the same experience, this time round I had less side effects when taking the hormones and anti androgens. I’ve had my issues and experienced the highs and lows of becoming the real me. I’ve never had a guy reject me for still having my nuts.

For me I guess it doesn’t matter as long as the person is happy and comfortable with themselves. They’re all beautiful but porn colours mens judgements when it comes to the reality of sissies and trans. I’ve been with both trans women who still have their festivals and a couple who have had them removed and are happier than ever.

I’ve been a sissy and enjoyed sex with other men, never had one who expected me to have no balls. As a trans woman I’ve had men who are surprised I still have mine and men who expected them to be there. None have been turned off or rejected me. I’ve been on hormones a while and had some minor surgeries. The only thing left to do is the final step, at the moment I’m having doubts about it, I’m really happy and content as I am.

 

[2tallpaul]

There's nothing like seeing a thigh gap. Or the feeling of a studs balls slapping and being able to reach and hold them. It's not so much ab out sex as self identification. After long term hormone use, they were useless at that point. My sister is pissed saying I have nicer nipples than she does and I accept life to be good.