jd4george
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
- Posts
- 137
That was the headline in this morning's paper: CARNAGE IN MOSUL The letters were three inches high (I measured them). The first section of the paper had some 8 additional pages, all decrying this most recent death toll: 24 soldiers died and some 80 were wounded. (Of that, 2 men were from Maine, and 6 or 8 were among the wounded).
Yes, it's terrible. It is also the cost of war making.
Somewhere along the line, we have become intolerant of death. Each American that is killed is now memorialized on the evening news, complete with pictures of the family's tears, the soldier's dreams, and pictures of their high school football trophies.
The upside, perchance, is that public opinion may hasten the end of this conflict. But that is not why this morning's headline bothered me.
A couple of months ago, I posted a poem: Pagan Rites of the Barbarian King It is (was) a little diatribe about this war, and about the human cost of our warlike nature. It is about the millions who have died in the name of "political righteousness". It is about waste. It is about forgetting our own history, and the cost in human lives.
My problem is that we conveniently forget. Yesterday, 24 of our bretheren were killed... over 1300 to date. But I have a hard time with the numbers. Back in 1864, during the Battle of the Wilderness, over 15,000 men died in the first ten minutes. (See my poem Wilderness Road, 1864
But those numbers pale in comparison to the true carnage that we participated in during the 20th Century. When I say we, I'm talking about mankind... not just Americans.
Consider these number that I posted in my comment on "Pagan Rites of the Barbarian King":
"The 5.5 million military and civilian casualties of those six 20th Century events pales in comparison to the 20 million victims of Stalin's scourge, or the 35 million victims of the 1960's famine caused by the policies of Mao Zedong.
Sadly, they all died in the name of political righteousness.
Auschwitz: 1.2 million killed
Nagasaki: 135,000 killed
Leningrad: 1.6 million killed
Verdun: 750,000 killed
Stalingrad: 1.52 million killed
Nanjing: 300,000 killed"
24 soldiers died yesterday, and they shouldn't have. Poetically, and emotionally, I beleive in the carnage of "one", or "24"... but lest we forget, if one soldier dying is a carnage, then what of those 60.5 million?
I'd rather be talking about Christmas, but this has my dander up! Thanks for letting me vent, and I'm going to close with the ending verse from the aforementioned poem:
"He just strummed softly at his harp
as the fires were lit, and the cities burned.
In the roar of that rampant, silent blaze
I could not hear the children scream
as they were swallowed by the flames,
their bones soon fashioned into swords."
Yes, it's terrible. It is also the cost of war making.
Somewhere along the line, we have become intolerant of death. Each American that is killed is now memorialized on the evening news, complete with pictures of the family's tears, the soldier's dreams, and pictures of their high school football trophies.
The upside, perchance, is that public opinion may hasten the end of this conflict. But that is not why this morning's headline bothered me.
A couple of months ago, I posted a poem: Pagan Rites of the Barbarian King It is (was) a little diatribe about this war, and about the human cost of our warlike nature. It is about the millions who have died in the name of "political righteousness". It is about waste. It is about forgetting our own history, and the cost in human lives.
My problem is that we conveniently forget. Yesterday, 24 of our bretheren were killed... over 1300 to date. But I have a hard time with the numbers. Back in 1864, during the Battle of the Wilderness, over 15,000 men died in the first ten minutes. (See my poem Wilderness Road, 1864
But those numbers pale in comparison to the true carnage that we participated in during the 20th Century. When I say we, I'm talking about mankind... not just Americans.
Consider these number that I posted in my comment on "Pagan Rites of the Barbarian King":
"The 5.5 million military and civilian casualties of those six 20th Century events pales in comparison to the 20 million victims of Stalin's scourge, or the 35 million victims of the 1960's famine caused by the policies of Mao Zedong.
Sadly, they all died in the name of political righteousness.
Auschwitz: 1.2 million killed
Nagasaki: 135,000 killed
Leningrad: 1.6 million killed
Verdun: 750,000 killed
Stalingrad: 1.52 million killed
Nanjing: 300,000 killed"
24 soldiers died yesterday, and they shouldn't have. Poetically, and emotionally, I beleive in the carnage of "one", or "24"... but lest we forget, if one soldier dying is a carnage, then what of those 60.5 million?
I'd rather be talking about Christmas, but this has my dander up! Thanks for letting me vent, and I'm going to close with the ending verse from the aforementioned poem:
"He just strummed softly at his harp
as the fires were lit, and the cities burned.
In the roar of that rampant, silent blaze
I could not hear the children scream
as they were swallowed by the flames,
their bones soon fashioned into swords."