Cannot answer the question...

[oggbashan]

This is why we can never have nice things, oggy the numbnut fluffer boy.

So what was your point?

That the US is not the country of your ideals?

 

[ryan8558]

http://www.anarchism.net/images/download_ca_red.jpg

 

[allateup]

So what was your point?

That the US is not the country of your ideals?

Poor oggy the numbnut fluffer boy...

His entire existence wrapped-up in the consensual debate of socialist politics prevents him from ever realizing there are many who hold no desire nor need at all to actually discuss any practical issue with such a unicorn fart sucker as he.

 

[oggbashan]

Poor oggy the numbnut fluffer boy...

His entire existence wrapped-up in the consensual debate of socialist politics prevents him from ever realizing there are many who hold no desire nor need at all to actually discuss any practical issue with such a unicorn fart sucker as he.

Abuse is all you can produce?

 

[allateup]

Abuse is all you can produce?

"Abuse"?



Not quite acquainted with the actual meaning of that word, eh chap?

Poor, poor oggy the numbnut fluff boy.

 

[oggbashan]

"Abuse"?



Not quite acquainted with the actual meaning of that word, eh chap?

Poor, poor oggy the numbnut fluff boy.

I am aware of the term.

I am also aware that you prefer personal abuse to rational discussion.

When are you getting treatment for your disorders?

 

[allateup]

I am also aware that you prefer personal abuse to rational discussion.

Really? Good. Just in case, allow me to repost...

Poor oggy the numbnut fluffer boy...

His entire existence wrapped-up in the consensual debate of socialist politics prevents him from ever realizing there are many who hold no desire nor need at all to actually discuss any practical issue with such a unicorn fart sucker as he.

You can only enjoy your "rational discussion" with others to the degree they share your progressive piece of shitness.

Elsewise, statists like you are enemies to individual liberty and do not merit any degree of practical discussion on political issues at all.

 

[oggbashan]

Really? Good. Just in case, allow me to repost...



You can only enjoy your "rational discussion" with others to the degree they share your progressive piece of shitness.

Elsewise, statists like you are enemies to individual liberty and do not merit any degree of practical discussion on political issues at all.

You still can't get beyond abuse, can you?

You don't know my politics. All you know is terms of abuse that are entirely misdirected because you are completely besotted with your own issues.

You can't and don't 'rationally discuss' anything with anyone. That is why you are on so many people's ignore lists, but not currently on mine.

Please emulate the oozlum bird.

 

[allateup]

blah, blah, blah, blah...blah.

Less whine, more fluff, eh oggy numbnuts?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

allateup proves my point.

Socialism is a US term of abuse.

It didn't exist at the time of the American Revolution.

Another question: If the US is so good on individual liberty, how come someone can receive a visit from a SWAT team for not mowing their grass?

If I want to let my grass grow, no government or city agency can or will do anything about it.

Yes, it did. It was the difference between the American and French Revolutions.

Socialism is what Socialists called their philosophy along with Communism, Fascism, Fabianism and Progressivism. Why do why have SWAT teams with almost every government agency now? Because they have become centralized, all-powerful and Imperial.

We could also call it Statism. No matter what we call it, the actions of those who uphold that ideology, will, by their own tendency to authoritarian tyranny in the name of altruism will always reduce the term to a pejorative. Otherwise, not one of those words would evoke a single negative connotation. They even took the label "liberal" and by operating under its banner turned it into a dirty word to the point that real Liberals ad to begin calling themselves Libertarians.

 

[PoppingTom]

They even took the label "liberal" and by operating under its banner turned it into a dirty word to the point that real Liberals ad to begin calling themselves Libertarians.

... or "Libbofags" (I like that word )

 

[allateup]

Yes, it did. It was the difference between the American and French Revolutions.

No, it wasn't.

"the difference between the American and Revolutions" was that the former was declared "with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence", while the latter simply depended upon the unbridled reason of man.

Individual liberty is a natural gift from God; an individual's "certain inalienable rights" can only exist if they are "endowed by their Creator".

Anyone - no matter what political stripe they choose to apply to themselves - who doesn't revere the Creator as the endower of inalienable rights can only rely on man to decide which "rights" any man may or may not enjoy, at whatever time in history, which makes anyone of that stripe some degree of statist piece of shit.

That's why you were born a democrat Gimp, became a neo-con, and now enjoy calling yourself a "Libertarian", because your latest degree of statist piece of shit serves simply as the lipstick you currently happen to favor to cover-up the tyrannical wannabe you natively are.

 

[PoppingTom]

Anyone - no matter what political stripe they choose to apply to themselves - who doesn't revere the Creator as the endower of inalienable rights can only rely on man to decide which "rights" any man may or may not enjoy, at whatever time in history, which makes anyone of that stripe some degree of statist piece of shit.

That's why you were born a democrat Gimp, became a neo-con, and now enjoy calling yourself a "Libertarian", because your latest degree of statist piece of shit serves simply as the lipstick you currently happen to favor to cover-up the tyrannical wannabe you natively are.

Can somebody translate that shit in a 3-word sentence?


(Just if it really makes sense....)

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Uh, the French Revolution focused on Social Justice.

It did not focus on Natural Rights.

It focused on a laundry list of what government should do for the people. President Obama's cherished positive liberties.

Pretty much everything else you are saying is a load of crap.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Can somebody translate that shit in a 3-word sentence?


(Just if it really makes sense....)

A_J is an atheist.

A_J doesn't believe in Natural Rights.

∴ A_J is a Socialist/Statist piece of filth.

:shrug:

Please note: http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=802444

Where I lay out the case for natural rights sans the big magic Santa in the sky...

 

[PoppingTom]

A_J is an atheist.

I said "if it makes sense"......

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I said "if it makes sense"......

Yeah, I know.



I could not help myself. Ogg says that this is an old idiot reborn under a new name.

I don't know which one, and I don't care. The style is pretty generic hate.

 

[Sean]

Can somebody translate that shit in a 3-word sentence?


(Just if it really makes sense....)

Eeyore thinks a magic man in the sky says he is allowed to own a gun.

 

[miles]

Fleas with rich friends.




Or is that flees...?

No, it's fleece.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No, it's fleece.

True too...

 

[PoppingTom]

Eeyore thinks a magic man in the sky says he is allowed to own a gun.

And this is the difference between socialist and democrat?

 

[Sean]

And this is the difference between socialist and democrat?

I gave up trying to understand what passes for Eeyore logic a long time ago.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

And this is the difference between socialist and democrat?

Certainly not.

Both think that Gawd is dead and wish gun-owners were too...

 

[Ishmael]

Not only could she NOT answer the question, she sounded like a babbling idiot while not answering the question.

Ishmael

 

[PoppingTom]

I gave up trying to understand what passes for Eeyore logic a long time ago.

Maybe, he's too ingenius for ordinary explanations.