California Magazine Ban Blocked

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
67,021
This after the present law forced me to buy a pistol that had less than a 10 round magazine capacity.


Federal judge blocks California ban on high-capacity magazines
BY ALEXANDRA YOON-HENDRICKS

A federal judge has temporarily blocked a voter-approved California law that would have forced gun owners to get rid of high-capacity ammunition magazines by this Saturday.

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, who is based in San Diego, issued a preliminary injunction Thursday that found the law was likely unconstitutional because it prevented people from using firearms that employed “whatever common magazine size he or she judges best suits the situation.” The law would have barred people from possessing magazines containing more than 10 bullets.

“The State of California’s desire to criminalize simple possession of a firearm magazine able to hold more than 10 rounds is precisely the type of policy choice that the Constitution takes off the table,” the injunction read.

http://www.sacbee.com/news/state/article158965184.html
 
It wouldn't matter anyway. No gun nut would ever hand over any of his toys for any reason. How else could he defend himself from the zombies?
 
Dude...they sell bullets called Zombie Max, and they work. How many zombies have you seen lately?

:rolleyes:

And exactly what is a "gun nut?"
 
Frodo doesn't know dick about guns or gun owners...



He truly believes in the fear-mongering of the far-left on every topic.
 
They all claim to be responsible, law-abiding citizens, but when it comes to possession of an illegal weapon, they hunker down and shout, "take it if you dare."
 
The State would shit its red-doper diapers if they saw my 50 round 12-gauge drums...



:D ;) ;)

This law has forced many people to divest themselves of expensive private property in anticipation of the law going into effect tomorrow. California is knowingly violating the constitutional rights of its citizens. Democrats running the state cynically calculate how long they can impose draconian insult to the Second Amendment and infringe personal liberty before judicial relief will likely occur before they even write these laws.
 
They all claim to be responsible, law-abiding citizens, but when it comes to possession of an illegal weapon, they hunker down and shout, "take it if you dare."

So a gun nut is someone who possesses an illegal weapon? Exactly what is an illegal weapon...tanks, missiles, and smart bombs?

If someone has illegal weapons they're criminals. Of course they'd resist.

Jesus Fuck, dude. You need a check up from the neck up.
 
I just saw Disgustipated's AV. Somebody help him pull his dick out of the wall socket, thanks. Poor littler dude.:rolleyes:
 
So a gun nut is someone who possesses an illegal weapon? Exactly what is an illegal weapon...tanks, missiles, and smart bombs?

If someone has illegal weapons they're criminals. Of course they'd resist.

Jesus Fuck, dude. You need a check up from the neck up.

In order to help him stop posting crap, he may need a new butt plug as well.:D
 
This law has forced many people to divest themselves of expensive private property in anticipation of the law going into effect tomorrow. California is knowingly violating the constitutional rights of its citizens. Democrats running the state cynically calculate how long they can impose draconian insult to the Second Amendment and infringe personal liberty before judicial relief will likely occur before they even write these laws.
Hi-cap mags have been illegal to sell in CA since 2000. What excuse does a law-abiding gun nut have to still own any?
 
Hi-cap mags have been illegal to sell in CA since 2000. What excuse does a law-abiding gun nut have to still own any?

*View Post*

It only prohibited the sale of large capacity magazines and grandfathered those already in possession. Prop 63 last November outlaws all possession. Which amounts to a seizure of private property without compensation and aviolation of the Second Amendment.

Edited toi add: It's also ex post facto law.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top