By far the most retarded article ever written this year.

[LJ_Reloaded]

https://www.1843magazine.com/features/its-a-boy-thing

IT’S A BOY THING
Data suggest that couples who have sons are more likely to stay together than those that don’t. Emily Bobrow looks into why this might be

It's because the researchers are stupider than Amy Schumer and Lena Dunham strung out on crack cocaine. This is almost as dumb as a Donald Trump speech. I can't even imagine how much brain damage was needed to string words together like they did in this article...

I got 3 daughters and a son and my marriage is rock solid. 3 daughters outweighs one boy.

 

[lovecraft68]

This does seem like someone who wanted to research a personal belief and really push it. In reality I can't see how the gender of your child affects the marriage holding together.

 

[Rachel_X]

It's the mere presence of a boy that holds couples together.
Having girls doesn't force them apart.
Thus three girls cannot cancel out one boy.

Think of it like having pink balls and blue balls (pun quite possibly intended).
Just because you have three pink balls, it doesn't stop the single blue ball existing.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

This does seem like someone who wanted to research a personal belief and really push it. In reality I can't see how the gender of your child affects the marriage holding together.

Ever so often we agree. This study is such a load of horseshit that they should just print that thing out and sprinkle it on a corn field.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

It's the mere presence of a boy that holds couples together.
Having girls doesn't force them apart.
Thus three girls cannot cancel out one boy.

Think of it like having pink balls and blue balls (pun quite possibly intended).
Just because you have three pink balls, it doesn't stop the single blue ball existing.

We were doing quite fine with the two daughters I sired and the one we adopted, before we adopted our son.

My eldest kid is the one I taught how to do subnetting. Now she knows how to put keyloggers in secure laptops and understands evil maid attacks. She's almost a teenager. Take a big guess as to who my protege in life is.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Oh no, someone found a correlation that may have some meaning and LJ loses his shit!

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Oh no, someone found a correlation that may have some meaning and LJ loses his shit!

When someone as opposite from me as lovecraft68 agrees that this study is a load of garbage, you really look like an idiot hauling said garbage back home to cuddle with.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I like LC just fine but I've near heard him boast of his PH.D in psychology so I'm going to feel safe assuming his expertise is perhaps slightly better than my own.

The study may have been too small or any number of other flaws, most likely thanks to people like you nobody will ever attempt to recreate the numbers even though you could probably do semicasually. I mean the raw data on this must exist on dozens of other studies that weren't even paying attention to it.

But it's also possible there is a genuine reason, but good job being pissed about nothing!

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I like LC just fine but I've near heard him boast of his PH.D in psychology so I'm going to feel safe assuming his expertise is perhaps slightly better than my own.

The study may have been too small or any number of other flaws, most likely thanks to people like you nobody will ever attempt to recreate the numbers even though you could probably do semicasually. I mean the raw data on this must exist on dozens of other studies that weren't even paying attention to it.

But it's also possible there is a genuine reason, but good job being pissed about nothing!

Leave it to you to not realize the boneheaded article is asserting that sons are more important to keeping a marriage alive than daughters. Of course you wouldn't recognize the sexist implications, because you're an idiot and you only play at being a feminist to get pussy points.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Leave it to you to not realize the boneheaded article is asserting that sons are more important to keeping a marriage alive than daughters. Of course you wouldn't recognize the sexist implications, because you're an idiot and you only play at being a feminist to get pussy points.

I recognize that "fact" just fine. That doesn't mean the findings are not true for one reason or another. Maybe guys get jobs sooner (that's been my experience) and lower financial burdens on the family. Maybe girls are more expensive. Certainly appears to be true from a casual observation.

Maybe it's cultural, there are enough families where the name is passed on through the sons that that even if that contributed 1% to overall divorces it would add up.

I'm not actually that interested in being a feminist, I just know that in your world anybody who doesn't think women are scum qualifies and I don't debate people over definitions as long as we can communicate.

 

[SheLikes2Watch]

What kind of a mental midget uses the word retarded in a derogatory manner?

What are you, 9 and living in 1983?