Butt Hurt "Journalists"

Ramone45

Literotica Guru
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Posts
5,894
Aside from all the hubbub, they produce a dreadful product. They produce mostly editorial and opinion. I get frustrated because it's so hard to get objective information. It's insidious. labeling someone "anti-immigration" when they are against ILLEGAL immigration. Among others.
 
Aside from all the hubbub, they produce a dreadful product. They produce mostly editorial and opinion. I get frustrated because it's so hard to get objective information. It's insidious. labeling someone "anti-immigration" when they are against ILLEGAL immigration. Among others.

Sorry, but you've never given me the impression that you even understand what "objective" information is. :rolleyes:

Even here you don't seem to latch into the OBJECTIVE story on Trump and immigration. He's made it clear himself in his own statements and behavior that he, in fact, is antiimmigration of brown people. He has directly said he prefers Norwegians.
 
Sorry, but you've never given me the impression that you even understand what "objective" information is. :rolleyes:

Even here you don't seem to latch into the OBJECTIVE story on Trump and immigration. He's made it clear himself in his own statements and behavior that he, in fact, is antiimmigration of brown people. He has directly said he prefers Norwegians.

who doesnt?

who shouldnt?
 
Sorry, but you've never given me the impression that you even understand what "objective" information is. :rolleyes:

Even here you don't seem to latch into the OBJECTIVE story on Trump and immigration. He's made it clear himself in his own statements and behavior that he, in fact, is antiimmigration of brown people. He has directly said he prefers Norwegians.

I am not a fan of Mr. Trump. But his immigration stance is exactly the same as Bill Clinton's and Barack Obama's.
When Journalists make it clear that they like one person and they don't like another person, it's hard to feel they are objective. I mean we're all human and we all have bias no matter how hard we try to deny it. But supposed journalists really do have a sacred trust. A healthy democracy absolutely depends on a free press whom the citizenry trusts. We don't have that now. And it is subtle and insidious. Not to get stuck on immigration, but it's the words they use to color a story. "Undocumented" instead of "Illegal".
 
I am not a fan of Mr. Trump. But his immigration stance is exactly the same as Bill Clinton's and Barack Obama's.
When Journalists make it clear that they like one person and they don't like another person, it's hard to feel they are objective. I mean we're all human and we all have bias no matter how hard we try to deny it. But supposed journalists really do have a sacred trust. A healthy democracy absolutely depends on a free press whom the citizenry trusts. We don't have that now. And it is subtle and insidious. Not to get stuck on immigration, but it's the words they use to color a story. "Undocumented" instead of "Illegal".

indeed!
 
Aside from all the hubbub, they produce a dreadful product. They produce mostly editorial and opinion. I get frustrated because it's so hard to get objective information. It's insidious. labeling someone "anti-immigration" when they are against ILLEGAL immigration. Among others.

The media conspiring against the President with false information in lockstep is the real collusion.
 
I am not a fan of Mr. Trump. But his immigration stance is exactly the same as Bill Clinton's and Barack Obama's.

No it's not. His is based on personal racial prejudice. If you don't see that, so is yours.
 
If that's true, upon what were the Clinton and Obama policies based?

They were based on immigration being a real problem issue beyond any racial element. Neither Clinton nor Obama have shown racial bias. If you think otherwise, cite your sources (or just shut the fuck up, you racial bigot). Trump has shown himself to be a racial bigot for like forever from back to his slum landlord days. Who do you think you're fooling?
 
They were based on immigration being a real problem issue beyond any racial element. Neither Clinton nor Obama have shown racial bias. If you think otherwise, cite your sources (or just shut the fuck up, you racial bigot). Trump has shown himself to be a racial bigot for like forever from back to his slum landlord days. Who do you think you're fooling?
Take a deep breath, asshole. You're exhausting. I'm not a racial bigot, you stupid keyboard warrior. I am not a supporter of Mr. Trump. I don't know if he is a racial bigot. I think that is a very serious assertion; one you're much too comfortable making.
Are you saying that if you enact a policy whose effect can be interpreted as "racist", that policy is acceptable as long as the person enacting it doesn't say things you consider "racist"?
We have to get a grip on immigration. The process needs to be streamlined. Our country needs to be a better neighbor. To the extent that we can, make it so people can prosper in their native land.
 
Take a deep breath, asshole. You're exhausting. I'm not a racial bigot, you stupid keyboard warrior. I am not a supporter of Mr. Trump. I don't know if he is a racial bigot. I think that is a very serious assertion; one you're much too comfortable making.
Are you saying that if you enact a policy whose effect can be interpreted as "racist", that policy is acceptable as long as the person enacting it doesn't say things you consider "racist"?
We have to get a grip on immigration. The process needs to be streamlined. Our country needs to be a better neighbor. To the extent that we can, make it so people can prosper in their native land.

Oh, you don't know if Trump is a racial bigot or not. There, you go. That defines you. Yes, you are a Trump supporter. It's in your blood. And you don't know how to analyze what's floating out there in the public domain.
 
Oh, you don't know if Trump is a racial bigot or not. There, you go. That defines you. Yes, you are a Trump supporter. It's in your blood. And you don't know how to analyze what's floating out there in the public domain.

Oh, fer Chrissakes!
 
"I don't like 45 but he's a proven racist so he can't be all that bad."
~Ramone
 
I am not a fan of Mr. Trump. But his immigration stance is exactly the same as Bill Clinton's and Barack Obama's.
When Journalists make it clear that they like one person and they don't like another person, it's hard to feel they are objective. I mean we're all human and we all have bias no matter how hard we try to deny it. But supposed journalists really do have a sacred trust. A healthy democracy absolutely depends on a free press whom the citizenry trusts. We don't have that now. And it is subtle and insidious. Not to get stuck on immigration, but it's the words they use to color a story. "Undocumented" instead of "Illegal".

While I agree with this statement, I think that it applied ore to the campaign trail than the actual governing, especially for the who kept saying how he could not legally do what he finally did once he had more "flexibility."
 
Back
Top