Bump if Robdownsouth Says Anything Bright

[landslider2000]

No risk of that.

Robgoingdowninthesouth is a poorly educated little fool.

 

[landslider2000]

Rob is so dumb that he assumes I'm some Republican providing the party line.

If Rob were not so dishonest, he might recognize that I supported JFK before he was born.

I voted for Jimmy Carter. Okay, it was a mistake, but nonetheless...

But facts never get in the way of a moronic little ideologue like Rob.

 

[LukkyKnight]

You must care a lot about what he thinks and says to devote a new, separate thread to him in tribute.

 

[landslider2000]

Not at all.

Rob launched a thread to attack me.

This thread (which is obviously totally pointless) is a response to Rob's idiocy.

He is so stupid that he thought I was articulating a Repub position.

Per contra, I was saying precisely the opposite -- that Ms. Schiavo's life should have been gently, swiftly terminated.

 

[LukkyKnight]

Yeah, but rather than respond there where people could follow your rebuttal you created this thread, asking it to be bumped under certain conditions, and then doing so twice yourself.

Curious approach, IMHO.

 

[Purple Haze]

Bump...

 

[LukkyKnight]

...

This thread (which is obviously totally pointless) is a response...

I've been working on the logic here. Correct me if I'm confused, but does this mean it's pointless to respond but you did so anyway?

 

[Pookie]

Not at all.

Rob launched a thread to attack me.

This thread (which is obviously totally pointless) is a response to Rob's idiocy.

He is so stupid that he thought I was articulating a Repub position.

Per contra, I was saying precisely the opposite -- that Ms. Schiavo's life should have been gently, swiftly terminated.

So, you respond to idiocy with your own? And you're calling him stupid? Heh.

Carry on.

 

[woody54]

Not at all.

Rob launched a thread to attack me.

This thread (which is obviously totally pointless) is a response to Rob's idiocy.

He is so stupid that he thought I was articulating a Repub position.
Per contra, I was saying precisely the opposite -- that Ms. Schiavo's life should have been gently, swiftly terminated.

Have you considered the judgement was made purely on the line of debate your were using in that particular thread?

I suspect you are over reacting and saying something in line with current Republican thinking is irrelevant to how many Democrats you aligned yourself with in the past.

The Shiavo case is polluted with rightwing religious interference so there is no clear partisan line except for the irrational ranting of the Christian Right Chimp trying to influence the matter and we know how stable recovering drunks are.

 

[garbage can]

Rob is so dumb that he assumes I'm some Republican providing the party line.
But facts never get in the way of a moronic little ideologue like Rob.

Is it ok if I decide for myself??