"Bubba" Gets Head from Trump

[HisArpy]

Not quite. What we said was that a sex act between consenting adults was not an impeachable offense. But we all know you don't do nuance.

He wasn't impeached for the BJ. He was impeached for LYING about it.

That you don't know that speaks volumes about the lack of depth of your knowledge.

 

[YDB95]

The most powerful man on the planet has sexual relations with an intern. No way that can be considered consensual.

Legally, it was. I don't approve of what Clinton did, but that doesn't make it a crime.

 

[RobDownSouth]

He wasn't impeached for the BJ. He was impeached for LYING about it.

That you don't know that speaks volumes about the lack of depth of your knowledge.

And remind us, Squire Derpy, exactly WHY was President Clinton asked about this?

 

[Bray123]

I don't recall this one. You must be part of that new revisionist history oh it's old news or you're dragging this up all it never happened you guys are so full of BS no matter what happens there's always an excuse. Live with your choice and become poor

There's a lot of old news that doesn't count now. Such as the President not buying up stock in arms companies just before launching an invasion, not being a pedophile, not doing everything that the Russian President suggests.

Those days have long gone. get with the program!

 

[Bray123]

He wasn't impeached for the BJ. He was impeached for LYING about it.

That you don't know that speaks volumes about the lack of depth of your knowledge.

He was impeached over the definition of 'sexual relations'. Because the Republicans wanted to embarrass him with his wife.

Trump has no sense of embarrassment so that doesn't work with him.

 

[coati]

He wasn't impeached for the BJ. He was impeached for LYING about it.

That you don't know that speaks volumes about the lack of depth of your knowledge.

^^^Check it out-- a Puritan time-travelled to be with us here on Lit for Thanksgiving.

 

[HisArpy]

^^^Check it out-- a Puritan time-travelled to be with us here on Lit for Thanksgiving.

dudly, you have no idea how fucked up you really are. Suffice it to say that it's a LOT more than anyone suspects if you believe the shit you just posted.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Legally, it was. I don't approve of what Clinton did, but that doesn't make it a crime.

Spoken like a true male chauvinist. Lol.

 

[YDB95]

Spoken like a true male chauvinist. Lol.

That's rich coming from a Trump supporter!

 

[LLCox]

Not sure but we know who the bottom is…

Just so you don’t forget…

View attachment 2577812

Fried

 

[Saint_Ann]

That's rich coming from a Trump supporter!

That's rich coming from a Clinton supporter.

 

[YDB95]

That's rich coming from a Clinton supporter.

Consenting adults, Ann. Monica Lewinsky was one. E. Jean Carroll and those girls in the Miss Teen USA pageant were not.

 

[John_von_Neumann]

Not the first time that Ken demonstrated he doesn't understand consent.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Consenting adults, Ann. Monica Lewinsky was one. E. Jean Carroll and those girls in the Miss Teen USA pageant were not.

However you need to rationalize it. Lol.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Not the first time that Ken demonstrated he doesn't understand consent.

Nope, and the retard doubled down. lol

 

[YDB95]

However you need to rationalize it. Lol.

Feel free to show me where I got anything factually wrong.

 

[HisArpy]

Feel free to show me where I got anything factually wrong.

The weird thing about "consent" is that whenever you have a "boss" and an "intern" there's always a question about whether there really was "consent."

Most people think there isn't because those who fear for their jobs/position will often do whatever the boss demands, including having sex, in order to prevent losing said job/position.

This is why there are laws prohibiting workplace sexual advances.

So, factually, you're wrong when you say it was between "consenting" adults. How do I know this? Because Paula Jones sued Bill Clinton over it. That Monica did not doesn't change the FACT that Bill habitually made sexual advances to his underlings. A violation of law and raising the specter that there wasn't actually any "consent."

 

[YDB95]

So, factually, you're wrong when you say it was between "consenting" adults.

Nope. Legally, all that matters is that Lewinsky was of legal age and a willing participant. (Not to mention by all accounts, she initiated it by flashing her panties at Bill, at a time when the whole world knew he never even really tried very hard to keep his pants up.)

 

[HisArpy]

Nope. Legally, all that matters is that Lewinsky was of legal age and a willing participant. (Not to mention by all accounts, she initiated it by flashing her panties at Bill, at a time when the whole world knew he never even really tried very hard to keep his pants up.)

Lol. It's like you have no clue how fucking idiotic you are when you say shit like this.

Merely being of legal age doesn't equate to consent. ONLY consent equals consent, and if the consent is gained via force of ANY type, it's called rape or sexual assault. In addition to that, you're ASSUMING that Lewinsky was a "willing" participant despite the FACT that Clinton was her boss and there's a possibility that if she didn't say yes, she'd lose her position.

That possibility of losing her position negates "willing" every time unless you can affirmatively prove otherwise. You can't in this case because Lewinsky testified and there's nothing to show that she was willing BEFORE Bill propositioned her and lots to show that she wasn't. You claiming she was "flashing her panties" has no support as far as I can discover (ie; you made up that lie) because her interviews contradict what you're saying.

Monica Lewinsky said Tuesday that then-President Bill Clinton’s role in their affair that captured the nation’s attention for years and eventually led to his impeachment was “wholly inappropriate.”

“I think what’s really important to remember in today’s world is that we never should have even gotten to a place where consent was a question,” Lewinsky told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “The Lead.”

“So it was wholly inappropriate as the most powerful man, my boss, 49 years old. I was 22, literally just out of college. And I think that the power differentials there are something that I couldn’t ever fathom consequences at 22 that I understand obviously so differently at 48.”

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/05/politics/monica-lewinsky-social-media-cnntv

No one I know of regrets having consensual sex with their partner. Lewinsky obviously did.

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/News/mon...ling-president-bill-clinton/story?id=59183828

Something which, AGAIN, negates your bullshit about how she was "willing."

 

[John_von_Neumann]

Check out Rapey defending a fellow deplorable by effectively equating a consent gray area with adjudicated rape and sexual assault.

What a dork.

 

[HisArpy]

Check out Rapey defending a fellow deplorable by effectively equating a consent gray area with adjudicated rape and sexual assault.

What a dork.

Since when is Bill Clinton a "deplorable?"

And defending a woman's right to consent to sex without being forced in any way is somehow a bad thing in your mind?

I think you're confused about who the good guy is in all of this. Hint: It ain't you.

 

[Hel_Books]

Since when is Bill Clinton a "deplorable?"

And defending a woman's right to consent to sex without being forced in any way is somehow a bad thing in your mind?

I think you're confused about who the good guy is in all of this. Hint: It ain't you.

Hmmm. The words "Grab them by the pussy," come to mind here.

 

[HisArpy]

Hmmm. The words "Grab them by the pussy," come to mind here.

So, that applies to all men? Or only the men you disagree with on a political basis?

And of course, since Trump said it, that justifies everyone else doing it. Right?

Which is more than enough for you to try and say that DEFENDING a woman's ability to freely give her consent to sex is a bad thing.

How is it that you can face yourself in the mirror in the morning after believing the bullshit you spew?

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Hmmm. The words "Grab them by the pussy," come to mind here.

So, that applies to all men? Or only the men you disagree with on a political basis?

And of course, since Trump said it, that justifies everyone else doing it. Right?

Which is more than enough for you to try and say that DEFENDING a woman's ability to freely give her consent to sex is a bad thing.

How is it that you can face yourself in the mirror in the morning after believing the bullshit you spew?

I'm not sure I get your point here. Is it that Clinton did it consensually and that's bad while Trump did it non-consensually, according to his own words, and that's OK?

 

[HisArpy]

I'm not sure I get your point here. Is it that Clinton did it consensually and that's bad while Trump did it non-consensually, according to his own words, and that's OK?

1. There's a question of it actually being consensual. Lewinsky herself has raised that question - which tells me it wasn't.

2. What Trump says has no bearing on what CLINTON did.

3. If someone robs a bank, does that mean you can too? Or is bank robbery still a bad thing no matter who does it?

4. Does that same philosophy also apply to sex? Or, in your mind, is one rape sufficient to justify all rape?