BRICS vs G7, which is stronger?

gxnn

Literotica Guru
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Posts
534
In the bloc of BRICS (namely, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), India might be the most unreliable element that can have big collision and conflict with China and make the group disintegrated, but the collaboration of Russia and China which share long borders is big and strong enough to withstand any impact and strike.

In G7, Italy is strong in voice and very weak in action; France doesn't like Europe americanized, Germany has problems of Middle Eastern immigrants as France that has the same of North Africans, the UK now has a bad leadership which has lost the trust of the people, Canada has the same problem with the old government extended for a new term without any real and new progress, and Japan is in bad relationship with South Korea, which will impede their mutual cooperation with the US.

So at the moment, if there is a strife, BRICS seems a little advantageous over G7. LOL.
 
In the bloc of BRICS (namely, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), India might be the most unreliable element that can have big collision and conflict with China and make the group disintegrated, but the collaboration of Russia and China which share long borders is big and strong enough to withstand any impact and strike.

In G7, Italy is strong in voice and very weak in action; France doesn't like Europe americanized, Germany has problems of Middle Eastern immigrants as France that has the same of North Africans, the UK now has a bad leadership which has lost the trust of the people, Canada has the same problem with the old government extended for a new term without any real and new progress, and Japan is in bad relationship with South Korea, which will impede their mutual cooperation with the US.

So at the moment, if there is a strife, BRICS seems a little advantageous over G7. LOL.
You seem to have a poor grasp of what the G7 is. Can you even break down the G7 acronym into what it stands for? Then perhaps you might get an understanding of how trivial and meaningless your post is. ( even ignoring your own poorly learned political innuendos)
 
You seem to have a poor grasp of what the G7 is. Can you even break down the G7 acronym into what it stands for? Then perhaps you might get an understanding of how trivial and meaningless your post is. ( even ignoring your own poorly learned political innuendos)
If we are not the special agent of CIA, then what we can learn about either G7 or BRICS is almost the same.
I have presented my thought here based on my analysis, so I don't think it is trivial or meaningless. But you say nothing except your biased judgment of or throw a wet blanket on a young man who wants to learn more about the international political arena.
 
If we are not the special agent of CIA, then what we can learn about either G7 or BRICS is almost the same.
I have presented my thought here based on my analysis, so I don't think it is trivial or meaningless.
Again, you post nonsense. If you can't even explain what the acronym "G7" means, how do you expect to have an intelligent discussion about what the G7 is?.

You attempted a claim of some sort, like there is a "competition" between G7 and BRICS, yet you can't even augment what that is. Again, perhaps educate yourself. You seem to be able to access the WWW, so you must be able to access online sources of information.

CIA, what does an American intelligence agency have to do with the G7, BRICS or the tea in China>?

But you say nothing except your biased judgment of or throw a wet blanket on a young man who wants to learn more about the international political arena.
Didn't you claim to be a woman before, your Avatar sure appears as one. Had a sex change lately did you?
 
Europe is nearly finished as a global power. Brazil and Russia each have more oil than all of Europe. But BRICS is not a united group. The Indian-Australian-Japanese alliance will probably have a war with China.
 
Brazil is the most pro-American country in South America. It would be a shame to see it fall under Chinese economic or political domination. Joe Biden and his incompetent State Department could make it happen however.
 
Again, you post nonsense. If you can't even explain what the acronym "G7" means, how do you expect to have an intelligent discussion about what the G7 is?.

You attempted a claim of some sort, like there is a "competition" between G7 and BRICS, yet you can't even augment what that is. Again, perhaps educate yourself. You seem to be able to access the WWW, so you must be able to access online sources of information.
G7 stands for "7 Greatest Powers in the world", I think. But there is G20, too. So do you mean G7=God that makes the world in 7 days?
CIA, what does an American intelligence agency have to do with the G7, BRICS or the tea in China>?
It is only a figure of speech, you may change it to KGB, MI5, Snowdon, here I use CIA to show that it is a superb informant in the world that can get whatever info it wishes to get.
Didn't you claim to be a woman before, your Avatar sure appears as one. Had a sex change lately did you?
Thank you for your close following-up. But by our linguistic habit, we Chinese-speakers do not have the gender sense in the word choice in our daily communication,so here man is like person or human being, which can be used to mean male or female. In English, there is similar usage, as you will find in many business contracts or agreements. So be constructive and share your opinion. Don't waste too much time on such trivial details.
 
G7 stands for "7 Greatest Powers in the world", I think. But there is G20, too. So do you mean G7=God that makes the world in 7 days?

G7 stands for "group of seven", sorry you lose.
It is only a figure of speech, you may change it to KGB, MI5, Snowdon, here I use CIA to show that it is a superb informant in the world that can get whatever info it wishes to get.
You should think more carefully about the above, it is fundamentally wrong.
Thank you for your close following-up. But by our linguistic habit, we Chinese-speakers do not have the gender sense in the word choice in our daily communication,
Well that is a Chinese custom I am not familiar with, and given your record of being off point so often, forgive me if I don't believe you, without doing my own research on this.
 
G7 stands for "group of seven", sorry you lose.
Well, are you sure you win? OK, congratulations! But here I am not in a game but in a sincere discussion, so what is the point who wins or who loses?
You should think more carefully about the above, it is fundamentally wrong.
So don't hesitate to enlighten me how I am fundamentally wrong. That is why I open this thread.
Well that is a Chinese custom I am not familiar with, and given your record of being off point so often, forgive me if I don't believe you, without doing my own research on this.
That is not just applicable in China, in most parts of the world it is the style. You seem to have cut my original texts to serve your purpose of accusing me. It is not a proper way of discussing, don't you agree?
 
Well, are you sure you win? OK, congratulations! But here I am not in a game but in a sincere discussion, so what is the point who wins or who loses?
It's an expresioin of speech when pointing our to the other person when they are wrong, or incorrect.
So don't hesitate to enlighten me how I am fundamentally wrong. That is why I open this thread.
No you opened this thread with a statement making a claim.

Russia and China which share long borders is big and strong enough to withstand any impact and strike.
You then made a claim about the G7 being weak due it's leaders
the UK now has a bad leadership which has lost the trust of the people
What you fail to understand is what the G7 does: "to coordinate global economic policy and address other transnational issues" and I should point out, Russia was a member until it's unprovoked attack in 2014. Since the G7 is the top 7 economies out of the 194 in the world, they do get to dictate policy.

BRICS is a global group comprised of emerging economies. Who's main focus is to enter and gain more influence on the worlds economy. Because they are relatively new, their focus is not to dominate the world economic policy's as much as find common ground to stake their place at the G7 table. Some are already members of the G20.

I have no idea what you are trying say about Brics and the G7. But it seems like you think BRICS will be more successful, but I at what, I really have no clue.
That is not just applicable in China, in most parts of the world it is the style. You seem to have cut my original texts to serve your purpose of accusing me. It is not a proper way of discussing, don't you agree?
What I did was quote a bit of what you said, and answered to that. Yes you are off the mark on what you claim,which means I do not trust your words. That is not accusing you, that is stating my opinion of you and what you post.
 
@Fuzzy1975 Thank you for your reply, which has offered more meaningful information than the previous ones, but there is still more space for this to be improved.
I did not make any claim as you said, but simply tell others my opinion, without which no discussion can go on, right?
Now when we come to the topic of strife, there is no limit on economic power only. A country can be called a power due to its general and overall strength, otherwise Switzerland, Ireland, Singapore, Cayman Islands are big powers too.
So if there is conflict between two groups, it is very likely it will end up in real war if they do not try to control themselves.Even in a peaceful and loving family, an angered member may kill his parents or sibling, we have seen too many such examples in real life.
Of course we do not like to see conflicts between G7 and BRICS, but as G7 has resorted to economic sanctions on Russia for the Ukrainian war, it is fair Russia will revenge, seeking helps from whoever sympathizeswith it, and as a result, G7 amd BRICS will be against each other for their benefits.
So it is necessary and interesting for us to discuss who is more powerful in this context.
 
BRICS rising means others must be falling to use the world's finite and shrinking resources.
 
My thoughts on the subject.

BRICS is going nowhere. With the exception of India, which you have pointed out is drifting out of that alliance, we are looking at failed states.

With the exception of Russia they are all dependent on food and energy imports. They cannot sustain themselves in the absence of international free trade. This fall will bring those dependencies into clear focus. Russia and China are in the midst of a demographic collapse. Quite frankly China is the only entity holding that alliance together and it's very questionable as to whether they can continue to do so going forward.

The only nation vulnerable in the context I outlined is Japan and the rest of the G7 are aware of Japan's importance and will sustain it.
 
In G7, Italy is strong in voice and very weak in action; France doesn't like Europe americanized, Germany has problems of Middle Eastern immigrants as France that has the same of North Africans, the UK now has a bad leadership which has lost the trust of the people, Canada has the same problem with the old government extended for a new term without any real and new progress, and Japan is in bad relationship with South Korea, which will impede their mutual cooperation with the US.
Wow, interesting observations

I don't understand these things, but what I noticed about the war with Ukraine,
is that most European (Western + Eastern) press behaves in the manner you alluded to -- an American colony--
it just C&P'S American newspapers

France clearly stands out, some are saying that it's trying to become EU's new colonial leader
Italian laypeople are no1 in polls, re disagreeing with America's war strategy in Ukraine

In G7, Italy is strong in voice and very weak in action;
how? at G7
 
Wow, interesting observations

I don't understand these things, but what I noticed about the war with Ukraine,
is that most European (Western + Eastern) press behaves in the manner you alluded to -- an American colony--
it just C&P'S American newspapers

France clearly stands out, some are saying that it's trying to become EU's new colonial leader
Italian laypeople are no1 in polls, re disagreeing with America's war strategy in Ukraine


how? at G7
Answering both of you.

Just as China is the senior partner in BRICS (it used to be Russia, at least by perception) the US is the senior partner in the G7. The US tolerates scrabbling, China doesn't. The only nation that has scrabbled with China is India and in the not to distant future India just may make it the G8, if not in fact at least in spirit.
 
In the bloc of BRICS (namely, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), India might be the most unreliable element that can have big collision and conflict with China and make the group disintegrated, but the collaboration of Russia and China which share long borders is big and strong enough to withstand any impact and strike.

In G7, Italy is strong in voice and very weak in action; France doesn't like Europe americanized, Germany has problems of Middle Eastern immigrants as France that has the same of North Africans, the UK now has a bad leadership which has lost the trust of the people, Canada has the same problem with the old government extended for a new term without any real and new progress, and Japan is in bad relationship with South Korea, which will impede their mutual cooperation with the US.

So at the moment, if there is a strife, BRICS seems a little advantageous over G7. LOL.
The G7 is currently stronger because the dollar is still strong. A question to you. Do you think Xi will invade Taiwan.
 
In G7, Italy is strong in voice and very weak in action;
how? at G7
Perhap I could not match my words with my thought very well. Historically, Italy in WWII was the weakest in fighting and it couldn't even win over Ethiopia, the poorest country in the world. But in soccer field, Italy is very nice, LOL, even Germany cannot break the famous Italian concrete defence. Personally I know a few Italian friends, they are all nice looking men and good experts in bed, there is no doubt of that. But in a street fight, one of them chose to run away like a rabbit when facing an angry but much thinner local rickshaw puller in Dhaka, Bangladesh, to my much surprise.
 
Back
Top