shereads
Sloganless
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2003
- Posts
- 19,242
Yes, Wild, it is slightly misleading and it's probably an effort to use this video to serve a larger purpose: bring about awareness that modern chicken-farming and meat-packng practices in the U.S. are crueler than necessary, even when workers aren't using animals as footballs.
Edited to add: Read "Fast Food Nation" and you'll see what I mean. The belief by McDonalds, KFC and other super-powers of the meat and poultry industries that we, the public, would not be willing to pay an extra two cents for a quarter-pounder, has created pressure on their suppliers to endanger human lives and create horrible conditions for the animals, in order to achieve super-fast kill rates. It's in your interest to know that the government three years ago stepped in to revoke stronger health and safety regulations in the industry, instructing FDA meat inspectors to IGNORE FECAL MATTER on meat "unless there is a visible fibrous structure."
It's not just unappetizing. It's toxic. And if you buy meat pre-ground, your own kitchen hygeine can't protect you from what was in the vat.
Edited to add: Read "Fast Food Nation" and you'll see what I mean. The belief by McDonalds, KFC and other super-powers of the meat and poultry industries that we, the public, would not be willing to pay an extra two cents for a quarter-pounder, has created pressure on their suppliers to endanger human lives and create horrible conditions for the animals, in order to achieve super-fast kill rates. It's in your interest to know that the government three years ago stepped in to revoke stronger health and safety regulations in the industry, instructing FDA meat inspectors to IGNORE FECAL MATTER on meat "unless there is a visible fibrous structure."
It's not just unappetizing. It's toxic. And if you buy meat pre-ground, your own kitchen hygeine can't protect you from what was in the vat.
Wildcard Ky said:I don't believe in the torture or abuse of any animal. Only kill it if you're going to eat it. If you're going to eat it, kill it as quickly and humanely as possible.
With that being said, there's something really starting to bother me about all of this.
Pilgrims Pride is the place where the abuse/torture occurred. KFC buys 15% of the chickens that come out of that facility. PETA is waging a full blown campaign against KFC in this matter, Pilgrims Pride is rarely if ever mentioned in this campaign by PETA.
Why isn't PETA waging the same campaign against Pilgrims Pride, or the other places that buy the other 85% of the chickens that come out of this facility?
Methinks that PETA is using this as a part of their agenda to go after KFC in their longstanding feud. If the interests of truth and fairness were being served by PETA in this particular matter, they would be campaigning against Pilgrims Pride, and the other companies that buy chickens from that facility.
Go to PETA's website and look at all of the info on this issue. Every article they have posted has the headlines of "KFC". KFC only constitutes 15% of the business from the facility that committed the acts, so why is KFC getting 100% of the bad press and blame from PETA?
Last edited: