BOMBSHELL, but really we knew this, didnt we?

Yes!

The link shows WHAT?

Beyond GENERIC war victims

Is there a SIMILIAR link to destroyed bodies of Israeli's that WERE not in a WAR ZONE that caused the IDF incursion?

How do YOU know those pics were from Jenin? Or that they were victims of IDF fire power? :rolleyes:
 
FFS, I come home from work and he's posted another 100,000 words.
Cut them down, BB.

On this one:
John Hawkins: How pervasive is anti-Americanism in Europe?

Claire Berlinski: Very, very. See poll numbers above. We see members of the Dutch parliament in hiding, the abrogation of freedom of expression throughout Europe, the rise of right-wing leaders who openly advocate the mass deportation of non-white Europeans, one barely-thwarted terrorist attack after another-and yet, according to the polls, the majority of Europeans consider the United States to be their biggest worry. They're monomaniacally obsessed with the danger posed to them by Americans and the perfidious cabal of Jews who yank our puppet strings.

I see a lot of anti Americanism in the UK, but I have NEVER heard the word Jew used in connection with it.
 
busybody said:
Yes!

The link shows WHAT?

Beyond GENERIC war victims

Is there a SIMILIAR link to destroyed bodies of Israeli's that WERE not in a WAR ZONE that caused the IDF incursion?

How do YOU know those pics were from Jenin? Or that they were victims of IDF fire power? :rolleyes:

I don't care.
 
busybody said:
then EDIT out that link

as it is MEANINGLESS! :rolleyes:

Does not compute. The person who posted those pics say they come from Jenin. By your logic, all links are meaningless.
 
Peregrinator said:
Does not compute. The person who posted those pics say they come from Jenin. By your logic, all links are meaningless.
who posted those pics?
 
busybody said:
who posted those pics?

Why do you ask me? Go click the link and ask them yourself.

Look, you idiot, any picture at all or any eyewitness account at all from any event in history can be attacked the way you're mindlessly attacking that link. If that's truly what you believe, that no evidence of anything is believable, just say that, and we can discuss something like epistemology, which doesn't require visual evidence.

All it is, is one person's pictures of the aftermath of Jenin. You don't believe it, fine.

As I said already, I don't care what you think of it.
 
busybody said:
You didnt?

Red Ken

You cant be SERIOUS if you really mean that!
WTF did Ken's attack on a Daily Mail reporter have to do with anti Americanism???
 
Peregrinator said:
Why do you ask me? Go click the link and ask them yourself.

Look, you idiot, any picture at all or any eyewitness account at all from any event in history can be attacked the way you're mindlessly attacking that link. If that's truly what you believe, that no evidence of anything is believable, just say that, and we can discuss something like epistemology, which doesn't require visual evidence.

All it is, is one person's pictures of the aftermath of Jenin. You don't believe it, fine.

As I said already, I don't care what you think of it.
but it was YOU that posted it as an example of Jenin

so YOU DO believe it :rolleyes:
 
The Jewish people wear their persecution as a badge of honor. If all anti-Semitism was eliminated, they would probably turn against each other (again).
 
phrodeau said:
The Jewish people wear their persecution as a badge of honor. If all anti-Semitism was eliminated, they would probably turn against each other (again).

I dont think they wear it as a "badge of honor", but what if they did? I think after what thy've been through they've earned the right.

Now explain "If all anti-Semitism was eliminated, they would probably turn against each other (again)."
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
I dont think they wear it as a "badge of honor", but what if they did? I think after what thy've been through they've earned the right.

Now explain "If all anti-Semitism was eliminated, they would probably turn against each other (again)."
Do you want Biblical examples or historic ones?
 
Peregrinator said:
I already answered this. Like five times. I don't care.
if you didnt care

you would NOT have posted the dubious link

so its accurate to say

you did care

and when called on it

and not being ABLE to defend it

you say you dont care :rolleyes:
 
busybody said:
if you didnt care

you would NOT have posted the dubious link

so its accurate to say

you did care

and when called on it

and not being ABLE to defend it

you say you dont care :rolleyes:

*sigh* Try to pay attention this time. You asked what happened at Jenin, and I vaguely remembered that link, so I posted it. Then you went into frothing mode, assuming that I had some investment in it. I don't care about the link; It was just something I remembered seeing once. That's all. I certainly don't care to argue dreidel logic with you. It's only as dubious as the rest of the internet.
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
I cant answer for BB but I'll answer for me.

Are all anti-semites anti-zionist, I havent heard any that arent.

Are all anti-zionists anti-semetic? No, of course not.

But In many cases their anti-zionist rhetoric becomes so shrill, one has to ask "If they were anti-semetic would they sound any different?

Frankly I believe that many guard their words so as to avoid betraying their latent anti-semitism. You could even ask "Do all anti-semites admit, or even realize, they are anti-semetic?" No, I honestly dont think they do. Woody and Krastner being examples.

One thing I look for when analyzing the rhetoric of anti-zionists, is some acknowledgement of the pure hate being offered by much of their muslim opposition and how that hate offers Isreal few real options. And frankly I see very little of that in the opponents of zionism.

Well, you asked me to comment on this, but it's pretty much a reasonable opinion, and you base it on your experience, so I'll say to the last paragraph that it seems like a good yardstick.

You know, just to stir the pot a little, I've seen Woody post negative stuff about the Nazis and the Palestinians, and he regularly castigates terrorist attacks by Palis as well.

Krastner is...harder to read....*chuckle*

I think it's a tough issue to talk about because of the strong passions it provokes.

Edit: I forgot to add that I've seen BB post positive comments about Hitler.
 
Back
Top