BOMBSHELL, but really we knew this, didnt we?

[Lavared]

It's the CAPS. Without them he seems much more reasonable.

 

[Peregrinator]

It's the CAPS. Without them he seems much more reasonable.

that's TRUE without

THE CAPS and the

RADICAL KILLHEADEDNESS

he DOES seem like a

REAL HUMAN BEING

 

[Lavared]

Wow! That really does work. When you talk in mixed upper/lowercase, Perg, you seem much less cogent.

 

[busybody..]

Look here you CREEPS

This is MY FUCKING THREAD

and I can say what I want and HOW I WANT!!!!!!!!!!!

You got that?????????????????

Now STFU

 

[busybody..]

that's TRUE without

THE CAPS and the

RADICAL KILLHEADEDNESS

he DOES seem like a

REAL HUMAN BEING

is it so radical to call for the death of those that ACTUALLY WANNA KILL YOU?

 

[unregistered]

 

[Peregrinator]

is it so radical to call for the death of those that ACTUALLY WANNA KILL YOU?

That ain't the radical part.

 

[busybody..]

No, and it's prefectly okay to be first at the gates of Hell to open the door for them as well.

and shove em in!

 

[DevilishTexan]

3 years after the 'war' started, countless searches by the U.S. military and 90,000 troops crawling around the countryside daily...and this comes out in a book about to be published?

I'd like to sell you a bridge.

Sure, Saddam was a swell guy. All he had were a few .38's left over from the 1930's.


Dude, wake up.

 

[busybody..]

Hey WHACKOH LIB LOON, aka, U-I

Did you see who was arressted in Ohio?

They ALL seemed respectable

married

in school and in BUSINESS

all led a QUIET LIFE

all ready to KILL Americans

ALL MooseLIMB

like your friend

Defend em

 

[busybody..]

something is not right

there is way too much smoke

there are way too mnay documents that have NOT been made public

AN INTERVIEW WITH RICHARD PERLE, who accuses the Bush Administration of "extraordinary, even foolish restraint" in disseminating documents from Saddam's regime


This is a SERIOUS SERIOUS charge by a serious and credible person

You can see and hear the interview at

http://blogs.pajamasmedia.com/wmd_files/2006/02/video_interviews_from_the_inte.php

 

[NaughtyLil1]

Yes, serious business.

 

[busybody..]

werent you on vacation or something

 

[NaughtyLil1]

werent you on vacation or something

I am. I just hanging out until everyone gets finished doing what they need to do.

 

[busybody..]

the simple question is

WHY HAVE THE DOCUMENTS AND THE TAPES NOT BEEN TRANSLATED AFTER ALL THESE YEARS?????????????

Who is hiding what and why????????????


"Saddam Had WMD"

That's the title of this editorial in Investors Business Daily, which reprises some of the recently discovered evidence. There are Saddam's audio tapes:

On them, Saddam talks openly of programs involving biological, chemical and, yes, nuclear weapons.


[A]s late as 2000, Saddam can be heard in his office talking with Iraqi scientists about his ongoing plans to build a nuclear device. At one point, he discusses Iraq's plasma uranium program — something that was missed entirely by U.N. weapons inspectors combing Iraq for WMD. This is particularly troubling, since it indicates an active, ongoing attempt by Saddam to build an Iraqi nuclear bomb.

"What was most disturbing," said John Tierney, the ex- FBI agent who translated the tapes, "was the fact that the individuals briefing Saddam were totally unknown to the U.N. Special Commission (or UNSCOM, the group set up to look into Iraq's WMD programs)."


Then there's the account given by Georges Sada, second in command in Iraq's air force:

He has written a book, "Saddam's Secrets," that details how the Iraqi dictator used trucks, commercial jets and ships to remove his WMD from the country. At the time, the move went largely undetected, because Iraq pretended the massive movement of materiel was to help Syrian flood victims.


Nor is Sada alone. Ali Ibrahim, another of Saddam's former commanders, has largely corroborated Sada's story.

So how was Saddam able to use his "cheat and retreat" tactics without being found out? He had help, according to a former U.S. Defense Department official.

"The short answer to the question of where the WMD Saddam bought from the Russians went was that they went to Syria and Lebanon," said John Shaw, former deputy undersecretary of defense, in comments made at an intelligence summit Feb. 17-20 in Arlington, Va.

"They were moved by Russian Spetsnaz (special ops) units out of uniform that were specifically sent to Iraq to move the weaponry and eradicate any evidence of its existence," he said.


The conclusion?

President Bush was right. We had to invade to disarm Saddam — otherwise, he would have completely reconstituted his chemical, nuclear and bio-weapons programs when inspectors left.


IDB could have added that we now know that Saddam trained thousands of terrorists at three or more training camps in Iraq, up to the beginning of the war in 2003. So the fear that Saddam might slip WMDs to terrorists for use in the U.S. was anything but far-fetched.

It is also important to note that only a tiny percentage of the documents left behind by Saddam's regime that potentially relate to WMD programs and support for terrorist groups, and only a tiny percentage of the audiotapes recorded in Saddam's office, have been translated. So far, we haven't even seen the tip of the iceberg; but even that has been enough to require the conventional wisdom to be re-evaluated. It seems virtually certain that there is much more to come on these subjects.


When the Iraq Survey Group reported that it was unable to find Saddam's WMDs, it was treated, understandably, as a huge news story. The news media interpreted the ISG's failure as undermining, to a great degree, the administration's case for the war. Fair enough. But now it appears that the administration, along with the CIA and the intelligence services of all other countries who assessed the issue, likely was right after all. Why isn't this equally big news?

 

[Peregrinator]

Hey, what's the source for this?

 

[busybody..]

do you EVER learn to read????????????????????????????

its in the FUCKING FIRST LINE OR SO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


IDB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Investors Business Daily!

Geez!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[busybody..]

here you go U_I!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=20&artnum=1&issue=20060224

geez

 

[busybody..]

what else do you want?

 

[Peregrinator]

do you EVER learn to read????????????????????????????

its in the FUCKING FIRST LINE OR SO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


IDB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Investors Business Daily!

Geez!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You idiot. I meant how did they hear all this.

 

[busybody..]

public info

some of this is on this thread

better question U_I is

if they know it and I know it

why is the MSM telling us?????????????????

 

[Peregrinator]

public info

some of this is on this thread

better question U_I is

if they know it and I know it

why is the MSM telling us?????????????????

What's the rest of your question?

 

[busybody..]

why is the MSM telling us?????????????????

 

[busybody..]

for that matter, it is now obvious that ABLKE DANGER identified virtually all the 9/11 bad guys months before 9/11


mostly thru DATA MINING from public sources


Yet the 9/11 commission says it aint so

AND

data mining FROM PUBLIC SOURCES is a sacred cow and frowned upon

why to both?

and why is DOD threathining the people who were on ABLE DANGER watch?


Something is wrong with the WMD and ABLE DANGER picture

 

[busybody..]

why is the MSM telling us?????????????????

OPPS

Shoulda written

WHY IS THE MSM NOT TELLING US!