Bill Slams Hillary's Campaign

[Rightguide]

Report: Bill Clinton Criticized Hillary’s 2016 Presidential Campaign: “Could Not Sell P***y on a Troop Train”​

By Kristinn Taylor Dec. 12, 2023 12:20 pm


Former President Bill Clinton reportedly criticized wife Hillary’s failed presidential campaign against Donald Trump in the fall of 2016 as not being able to “sell p*ssy to a troop train” according to a Fox News report on a new book by Intercept reporter Ryan Grim.

The decades long Clinton marriage has been rocked by Bill’s numerous affairs and allegations of rape and sexual assault. Hillary was accused by several of Bill’s alleged victims of intimidating them and covering up for Bill.

Bill Clinton was impeached by the House in late 1998 for perjury and obstruction of justice in a sexual assault lawsuit by Paula Jones that uncovered an affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Clinton was acquitted by the Senate in early 1999 after a pro forma trial.

Mote hilarity here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...iticized-hillarys-2016-presidential-campaign/

Damn what a beast.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Report: Bill Clinton Criticized Hillary’s 2016 Presidential Campaign: “Could Not Sell P***y on a Troop Train”​

By Kristinn Taylor Dec. 12, 2023 12:20 pm


Former President Bill Clinton reportedly criticized wife Hillary’s failed presidential campaign against Donald Trump in the fall of 2016 as not being able to “sell p*ssy to a troop train” according to a Fox News report on a new book by Intercept reporter Ryan Grim.

The decades long Clinton marriage has been rocked by Bill’s numerous affairs and allegations of rape and sexual assault. Hillary was accused by several of Bill’s alleged victims of intimidating them and covering up for Bill.

Bill Clinton was impeached by the House in late 1998 for perjury and obstruction of justice in a sexual assault lawsuit by Paula Jones that uncovered an affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Clinton was acquitted by the Senate in early 1999 after a pro forma trial.

Mote hilarity here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...iticized-hillarys-2016-presidential-campaign/

Damn what a beast.

Yesterday's news, no one gives a shit,except people like you.

 

[Rightguide]

Yesterday's news, no one gives a shit,except people like you.

Bill says her campaign couldn't “sell p*ssy to a troop train.” That's news, you just don't want to hear it properly interpreted.

 

[YDB95]

Doesn't pass the Google test, although it does sound plausibly like something Bill might say when he thought no one was listening.
Remember, we on the left never really liked the Clintons very much - they were simply the only alternative to something far worse.

 

[Rightguide]

Doesn't pass the Google test, although it does sound plausibly like something Bill might say when he thought no one was listening.
Remember, we on the left never really liked the Clintons very much - they were simply the only alternative to something far worse.

“The Squad: AOC and the Hope of a Political Revolution” by The Intercept’s Ryan Grim. So You're sure Ryan will soon be sued for libel by Bill in the near future, right?

 

[YDB95]

“The Squad: AOC and the Hope of a Political Revolution” by The Intercept’s Ryan Grim. So You're sure Ryan will soon be sued for libel by Bill in the near future, right?

If you knew a fraction as much about the law as you claim to, you would know in order to have grounds to sue Grim, Clinton would have to be able to prove some sort of monetary damages. And since he's famous, the bar would be set even higher than for John Q. Public.

 

[Rightguide]

If you knew a fraction as much about the law as you claim to, you would know in order to have grounds to sue Grim, Clinton would have to be able to prove some sort of monetary damages. And since he's famous, the bar would be set even higher than for John Q. Public.

Elements of Defamation​

To prove either type of defamation lawsuit, plaintiffs must usually prove the following elements:

1. The defendant made a false statement of fact concerning the plaintiff;
2. The defendant made the defamatory statement to a third party knowing it was false (or they should have known it was false);
3. The defamatory statement was disseminated through a publication or communication; and
4. The plaintiff's reputation suffered damage or harm

Truth is the absolute defense in a defamation case, If the defendant can demonstrate their allegedly defamatory statement is, in fact, a true statement, they win.

PS: I am not an attorney and have never claimed to be. I do have a fair knowledge of the law, however.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

What does that draft dodger know about troop trains anyway???

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Bill says her campaign couldn't “sell p*ssy to a troop train.” That's news, you just don't want to hear it properly interpreted.

Again, who gives a shit, her campaigned ended 7 years ago. Fuck you're a triggered idiot.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

PS: I am not an attorney and have never claimed to be.

True!!

I do have a fair knowledge of the law, however.

False...

 

[DeluxAuto]

What does that draft dodger know about troop trains anyway???

Trump?

Are you that fucking dumb?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Bill says her campaign couldn't “sell p*ssy to a troop train.” That's news, you just don't want to hear it properly interpreted.

What drew you to this story more -- Hillary or poop?

 

[ll74]

Lord you dipshits still have PTSD from Hilary

 

[zipman]

Bill says her campaign couldn't “sell p*ssy to a troop train.” That's news, you just don't want to hear it properly interpreted.

But what could they do with a can of corn?

 

[DeluxAuto]

The trifecta of a black man, a woman, and a racist have resulted in many brain cells being FUBARd.

 

[YDB95]

Elements of Defamation​

To prove either type of defamation lawsuit, plaintiffs must usually prove the following elements:

1. The defendant made a false statement of fact concerning the plaintiff;
2. The defendant made the defamatory statement to a third party knowing it was false (or they should have known it was false);
3. The defamatory statement was disseminated through a publication or communication; and
4. The plaintiff's reputation suffered damage or harm

Once again, you clearly either don't understand your own links, or you don't even read them. #4 there was my point: he would have to prove tangible damage. Since it's a sensationalistic quote from an extremely undependable source, he would never be able to do that. That is why you haven't heard anything about Clinton suing anyone over this, to get back to your original point.

Truth is the absolute defense in a defamation case, If the defendant can demonstrate their allegedly defamatory statement is, in fact, a true statement, they win.

If there's cause to bring the case to trial in the first place. Here, there isn't. In no way does that prove the quote is real.

PS: I am not an attorney and have never claimed to be. I do have a fair knowledge of the law, however.

No, you just think you do.