Bilderberg group

[Mike_Yates]

What kinds of things are discussed among members of the shady and mysterious Bilderberg group during their annual hotel conference?

 

[ryan8558]

pretty sure it's the black helicopters and talking appliances observing you.

 

[Emerson40]

Mike, your mother called.

She wants you to stop posting such silly things, go upstairs and put your laundry away, and wash your hands. Your lunch is almost ready.


http://67.media.tumblr.com/a4ff323b83e47cb5c354791bc5f9c9d8/tumblr_oc0zapcKjf1qjb290o1_500.jpg

 

[JohnnySavage]

Mostly we sit around and talk about Chicken Pot Pie.

 

[hashtag45]

Cool thread.
Pitty that people made fun of it and killed it, because it could have led to interesting things.

 

[Queersetti]

They show each other their tits.

 

[Queersetti]

Cool thread.
Pitty that people made fun of it and killed it, because it could have led to interesting things.

Like what?

 

[Que]

If I were to post what sort of shady things are discussed, it would lose the mystery.

 

[ryan8558]

If I were to post what sort of shady things are discussed, it would lose the mystery.

And then you would have to kill us.

 

[hashtag45]

Come on people. It's not like All people who wonder what's being discussed at those meetings are into conspiracy theories.

I mean: think tank which invites some of the most powerful individuals in the world, among others?
And particularly the secrecy (now this part looks at least questionable) no press or microphones allowed?

 

[patient1]

Mostly they just laugh about how Goldman Sachs cornered the market on the American election.

 

[Lovecutmuscles]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-tr...group-and-what-they-may-be-planning-now/13808


http://www.paulmcguire.us/bilderberg-2014.html

 

[hashtag45]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-tr...group-and-what-they-may-be-planning-now/13808


http://www.paulmcguire.us/bilderberg-2014.html

The 2nd link kindof lost me at the title, but the first one was really good.
Thanks.

 

[renard_ruse]

Jim Tucker has spent his life investigating and exposing this group. I would suggest checking out some of his work on the subject.

Sadly, the media and the globalists have been able to turn things bass ackwards and make lemonade out of lemons by making those who question, expose, or even mention the group into a "joke" and thereby deflecting the public from actually being concerned about the group itself.

That's why many people are now no longer referring primarily to Bilderberg itself, but the global elite in general. For example, the WEF, or World Economic Forum is not secretive, they hide the agenda in plain sight. Therefore, mentioning the WEF, is a better way to reach those who are skeptics that there's anything nefarious about Bilderberg.

The reality is we're gradually winning. The globalists ARE running scared. They lost Brexit. President Putin in Russia is fully aware of their agenda and has vowed to oppose them. They may stop Trump this year, or Le Pen in France, etc, but the seeds are sown.

The globalists are in for a bumpy ride in the coming decades, and all their mocking of their opponents as "crazy" or "theorists" or whatever crap they come up with won't work forever. They are now the ones on defense, and that's a bad place to be longterm.

 

[renard_ruse]

Cool thread.
Pitty that people made fun of it and killed it, because it could have led to interesting things.

Don't worry, its been a BAD year for the global elites, regardless of what their useful idiot cheerleaders on the internet want you to believe.

 

[hashtag45]

Sadly, the media and the globalists have been able to turn things bass ackwards and make lemonade out of lemons by making those who question, expose, or even mention the group into a "joke" and thereby deflecting the public from actually being concerned about the group itself.

That's why many people are now no longer referring primarily to Bilderberg itself, but the global elite in general. For example, the WEF, or World Economic Forum is not secretive, they hide the agenda in plain sight. Therefore, mentioning the WEF, is a better way to reach those who are skeptics that there's anything nefarious about Bilderberg.

Indeed.
Unfortunately, the wacky conspiracy theorists did everyone a disservice by discrediting the case of those who had legitimate, realistic concerns.
I'm amazed that some people don't even pause to ask themselves why discussions between so many powerful individuals are carried out in secrecy (no minutes, microphones or press allowed), and don't at least wonder about potential conflict in interests.

This article was more moderate and brought up the issues that even the most skeptical of skeptics wouldn't be able to dismiss as being "conspiratorial paranoia":



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...-the-most-influential-group-in-the-world.html

"Similarly, according to the author Jon Ronson, during the Falklands War David Owen managed to turn the weight of world opinion with a single speech demanding sanctions on Argentina before an audience of foreign ministers at Bilderberg. The sanctions were later imposed.

And for business leaders, it is a perfect opportunity to lay the groundwork for deals. According to Tom Bergin’s Spills and Spin, the account of the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster, Lord Browne, the head of BP, used a walk by Lake Como at the 2004 gathering in Italy to suggest a vast merger with Shell to create the world’s biggest oil company. Lord Browne left under the impression it would happen.

Such cosiness, critics say, is a threat to democracy.
“If our politicians want to be wined and dined in luxury for three days with Goldman Sachs, that seems to me a little bit like lobbying,” says Hannah Borno, a journalist and transparency campaigner, who will be outside The Grove today.
She wants the minutes of the discussions to be published. She is puzzled as to how the Bilderberg Association is granted tax exemption as a charity, when groups such as private schools usually need to pass a public benefit test.
She adds: “Conspiracy theories have served the group quite well, because any serious scrutiny could be dismissed as hysterical and shrill. But look at the participant list. These people have cleared days from their extremely busy schedules."