Biden Climate strategy, Don't Leave Your House

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
64,429

Biden Admin Floats New Strategy To 'Address the Climate Crisis': Don't Leave Your House​

Biden's 'blueprint for transportation decarbonization' touts 'remote work and virtual interactions'​


Collin Anderson
February 2, 2023

The COVID-19 pandemic wasn't all bad, a new Biden administration plan to fight climate change argues: It at least "highlighted major opportunities" to reduce travel demand and lower carbon emissions through "remote work and virtual interactions."

The plan—which President Joe Biden's Environmental Protection Agency and Energy, Transportation, and Housing departments released in January—aims to "eliminate nearly all greenhouse gas emissions" from the transportation sector by 2050, mostly through a transition to electric vehicles. Also included in the plan, however, is a controversial call to reduce "commuting miles" through "an increase in remote work and virtual engagements," including in education.

"Telework and other components of a digital economy … can improve convenience by reducing travel demand, especially for work commuting," the plan states. "The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted major opportunities for telework, with some studies showing the possibility of 10 percent long-term reduction in annual vehicle miles traveled." The plan goes on to identify "remote access to services like health care and education" as one of the "key determinants of future travel demand."

The administration's COVID-inspired call to reduce travel demand is certain to satisfy leading green energy groups, which have voiced similar rhetoric since the pandemic's onset. In April 2020, for example, the Rocky Mountain Institute touted "opportunities to reduce vehicle miles traveled via telework." But the plan is already prompting outrage among small business advocates, who point to the fact that more than 100,000 small businesses closed permanently during the first few months of the pandemic alone as owners dealt with decreased demand. For Job Creators Network president Alfredo Ortiz, that history would repeat itself if widespread telework was adopted in the name of climate change.

More here: https://freebeacon.com/biden-admini...ess-the-climate-crisis-dont-leave-your-house/

Once again we see befuddled leftists touting totalitarian solutions to their nonexistent religious beliefs.
 
Reducing carbon emissions isn't too difficult, but requires a change in mindset. The administration is just providing suggestions...which they should.

Totalitarianism wouldn't result in a suggestion.
 

Biden Admin Floats New Strategy To 'Address the Climate Crisis': Don't Leave Your House​

Biden's 'blueprint for transportation decarbonization' touts 'remote work and virtual interactions'​


Collin Anderson
February 2, 2023

The COVID-19 pandemic wasn't all bad, a new Biden administration plan to fight climate change argues: It at least "highlighted major opportunities" to reduce travel demand and lower carbon emissions through "remote work and virtual interactions."

The plan—which President Joe Biden's Environmental Protection Agency and Energy, Transportation, and Housing departments released in January—aims to "eliminate nearly all greenhouse gas emissions" from the transportation sector by 2050, mostly through a transition to electric vehicles. Also included in the plan, however, is a controversial call to reduce "commuting miles" through "an increase in remote work and virtual engagements," including in education.

"Telework and other components of a digital economy … can improve convenience by reducing travel demand, especially for work commuting," the plan states. "The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted major opportunities for telework, with some studies showing the possibility of 10 percent long-term reduction in annual vehicle miles traveled." The plan goes on to identify "remote access to services like health care and education" as one of the "key determinants of future travel demand."

The administration's COVID-inspired call to reduce travel demand is certain to satisfy leading green energy groups, which have voiced similar rhetoric since the pandemic's onset. In April 2020, for example, the Rocky Mountain Institute touted "opportunities to reduce vehicle miles traveled via telework." But the plan is already prompting outrage among small business advocates, who point to the fact that more than 100,000 small businesses closed permanently during the first few months of the pandemic alone as owners dealt with decreased demand. For Job Creators Network president Alfredo Ortiz, that history would repeat itself if widespread telework was adopted in the name of climate change.

More here: https://freebeacon.com/biden-admini...ess-the-climate-crisis-dont-leave-your-house/

Once again we see befuddled leftists touting totalitarian solutions to their nonexistent religious beliefs.
How to Create a False Narrative to Upset Dumb People - FauxNews Style

https://forum.literotica.com/thread...-to-upset-dumb-people-fauxnews-style.1580285/
 
It’s terrifying to imagine a world that could be warmer by as much as between one and two degrees Celsius. Humanity could never adapt.
 
That's the problem in a nut shell.........and what climate change deniers seem to miss the point on....*chuckles*

Sucks you have the answer but can't understand it.
Thankfully earth temperatures and weather patterns have been constant throughout human existence. Climate change is unprecedented in human history. There’s never been a need to adapt to droughts, floods, heatwaves and freezes.

A change of 1 to 2 degrees over several decades would require gradual re-engineering of regional water distribution, storage and flood control measures, changing agricultural crops and regions, population redistribution, different construction standards, forestry management, and technological innovation. Absolutely impossible, right?
 
Thankfully earth temperatures and weather patterns have been constant throughout human existence. Climate change is unprecedented in human history. There’s never been a need to adapt to droughts, floods, heatwaves and freezes.

A change of 1 to 2 degrees over several decades would require gradual re-engineering of regional water distribution, storage and flood control measures, changing agricultural crops and regions, population redistribution, different construction standards, forestry management, and technological innovation. Absolutely impossible, right?
Like I said, you don't understand, I'm not gona try and educate an idiot like you either.
 
Thankfully earth temperatures and weather patterns have been constant throughout human existence. Climate change is unprecedented in human history. There’s never been a need to adapt to droughts, floods, heatwaves and freezes.

A change of 1 to 2 degrees over several decades would require gradual re-engineering of regional water distribution, storage and flood control measures, changing agricultural crops and regions, population redistribution, different construction standards, forestry management, and technological innovation. Absolutely impossible, right?
Most of the time Fuzzy's mincing around covered in perspiration with one hand cupping his butt crack, looking for a dark safe place to unload another post.
 
Most of the time Fuzzy's mincing around covered in perspiration with one hand cupping his butt crack, looking for a dark safe place to unload another post.
*chuckles*
Sure,

So again, what did you predict for the 2020 election?

Or how about that highly touted investigation by Durham, that you claimed who expose the deep state or some such bullshit.
Maybe you can explain why your claim of a red wave never happened?

Nah, you won't, because you can't, you should really change your Alt here to wrongguide. That handle would fit you like a $200.00 pair of Italian leather gloves.
 
*chuckles*
Sure,

So again, what did you predict for the 2020 election?

Or how about that highly touted investigation by Durham, that you claimed who expose the deep state or some such bullshit.
Maybe you can explain why your claim of a red wave never happened?

Nah, you won't, because you can't, you should really change your Alt here to wrongguide. That handle would fit you like a $200.00 pair of Italian leather gloves.
Why don't you post exact quotes like a man, and I'll reply to each in turn.
 
Why don't you post exact quotes like a man, and I'll reply to each in turn.
Like a man??? LOL like you have any idea of what a "real man" is.......

A few years ago I mentioned the possibility of a Conspiracy investigation and prosecution of Clinton operatives. Now we see this from the incomparable Techno Fog:


It's official: Durham is investigating the Clinton Campaign.
Enter the Clinton Campaign Lawyers


Techno Fog

The latest filings by Special Counsel John Durham reveal that lawyers for the Hillary Clinton Campaign now represent Christopher Steele primary subsource Igor Danchenko. In doing so, Durham reveals something else: that the Hillary Clinton Campaign and multiple former employees of the Hillary Clinton Campaign are under investigation.

Let’s walk through the latest developments.

Background

Igor Danchenko, the primary subsource of Christopher Steele, was arrested on November 3, 2021 for giving multiple false statements to federal officials during his 2017 interviews with the FBI. These included lies about Danchenko’s sources, his travels to Russia, and his falsified contacts with Sergei Millian. We laid out Danchenko’s indictment here.

Notably, Special Counsel John Durham alleges that one of Danchenko’s real “sources” was Charles Dolan, Jr. (perhaps first identified by Aaron Mate), who served in various leadership positions to elect Bill Clinton in the 1992 and 1996 campaigns and was an advisor to Hillary Clinton in her 2016 campaign for president. With Dolan’s involvement, the obvious question becomes whether he was the intermediary between the Clinton Campaign and Danchenko.

Much more here:

https://technofog.substack.com/p/its-official-durham-is-investigating

Margot Cleveland, a Bulldog, has her teeth into this issue like no other.

Exclusive: Special Counsel’s Office Is Investigating The 2016 DNC Server Hack​

BY: MARGOT CLEVELAND
MARCH 10, 2022

The U.S. Department of Defense tasked the same Georgia Tech researcher embroiled in the Alfa Bank hoax with investigating the “origins” of the Democratic National Committee hacker, according to an email first obtained by The Federalist on Wednesday. That email also indicates the special counsel’s office is investigating the investigation into the DNC hack and that prosecutors harbor concerns about the DOD’s decision to involve the Georgia Tech researcher in its probe.

The special counsel branded this person “Researcher-1” in court filings. His identity has since been confirmed by his attorney as Georgia Tech’s Manos Antonakakis.


Antonakakis first garnered public attention when Special Counsel John Durham indicted former Hillary Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann. That one-count indictment charged the former Perkins Coie attorney with lying to FBI General Counsel James Baker when Sussmann provided Baker data and white papers purporting to show a secret communication network between the Russian-based Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization.

In charging Sussmann, the speaking indictment explained that tech executive Rodney Joffe first alerted Sussmann to data allegedly compiled by April Lorenzen that supposedly revealed a backdoor communication network between Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization. Joffe later allegedly asked two Georgia Tech researchers, Antonakakis and David Dagon—the latter identified in the indictment as Researcher-2—to mine internet data for evidence establishing a Trump-Russia connection.

According to the indictment, in mid-August, Antonakakis “queried internet data” maintained by Joffe’s tech company for the mail1.trump-email.com domain. The results from that search, however, showed no apparent connections between the Trump email and Russia, causing Antonakakis to tell Joffe that the results do “not make sense with the storyline you have.” Nonetheless, Joffe provided Antonakakis, Dagon, and Lorenzen a draft “white paper,” which presented a tale of an Alfa Bank-Trump secret communication channel, which the three then reviewed for Joffe.

More here:

https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/1...ce-is-investigating-the-2016-dnc-server-hack/

DONALD TRUMP SUES HILLARY CLINTON, DNC OVER RUSSIA HOAX​

by Grace Saldana March 24, 2022

President Donald J. Trump has dropped a bomb on the Democrat establishment which conspired against him to prevent his election in 2016. On Thursday, he filed a massive lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, the Democrat National Committee, and others affiliated with conspiring “to weave a false narrative” that he colluded with Russia.

“Acting in concert, the Defendants maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty,” President Trump’s filing states.

The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of Florida, seeks compensatory and punitive damages surpassing $24 million for defense costs, legal fees, and related expenses.

Also named in the suit include Michael Sussman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jake Sullivan, John Podesta, Fusion GPS, Christopher Steele, Igor Danchenko, James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe, and more.

Trump alleges this group of individuals took part in “falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources.” The crimes of Watergate “pale in comparison” to what these people schemed to do to him, the 45th president added.

https://rsbnetwork.com/news/donald-trump-sues-hillary-clinton-dnc-over-russia-hoax/

You can read the filing here:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157.1.0.pdf

Well now. He just kicked Stormy's ass and now those who most deserve it are going to have to lawyer up and defend themselves against Trump but against Durham's evidence as well. There are those who like to say the Russian collusion narrative wasn't a hoax but can we really believe Trump would spend millions suing these people if he didn't think he had a case? I seriously doubt it.
Ok Bozo, care to explain why NONE of your posts about any of this was correct?

*chuckles*

I'm going to load up a bunch more, while you're not answering these ones....fucking pussy

EDIT:

And wrongway has left the chat!

EDIT
And wrongway comes back, and proves he was wrong two out three, with one answer pending....I'm betting that will be wrong too, but folks we will have to wait n see.....
 
Last edited:
Like a man??? LOL like you have any idea of what a "real man" is.......






Ok Bozo, care to explain why NONE of your posts about any of this was correct?

*chuckles*

I'm going to load up a bunch more, while you're not answering these ones....fucking pussy

EDIT:

And wrongway has left the chat!
None of what you quoted above didn't happen. Every one of those headlines were true. The Durham report is now forthcoming and he did find corruption on the scale I said he would.
 
None of what you quoted above didn't happen. Every one of those headlines were true. The Durham report is now forthcoming and he did find corruption on the scale I said he would.
I never said it didn't happen, I said what you claimed would be the outcomes, were wrong!

Question as posted : "Ok Bozo, care to explain why NONE of your posts about any of this was correct?"

The question was not that the investigation didn't happen.......


Sure, Durham, the dude who got one conviction and two acquittals is going to release a report showing corruption on the scale you said....sure....

So far on three you are wrong on two and one outstanding answer not yet known....not a very good record. I'll go grab a few more.
 
I never said it didn't happen, I said what you claimed would be the outcomes, were wrong!

Question as posted : "Ok Bozo, care to explain why NONE of your posts about any of this was correct?"

The question was not that the investigation didn't happen.......



Sure, Durham, the dude who got one conviction and two acquittals is going to release a report showing corruption on the scale you said....sure....

So far on three you are wrong on two and one outstanding answer not yet known....not a very good record. I'll go grab a few more.
So quote those said alleged outcomes specifically.
 
So quote those said alleged outcomes specifically.
I like this one,
Nobody is forgetting anything, He's on trial for a federal felony, lying to the FBI which now has been proven by his own words. The ramifications of which for Sussman could lead him to cooperate with the prosecution. The trial testimony has made public evidence that could have already lead to further avenues of investigation and prosecution. There is the upcoming Danchenko trial as well. There may be several other indictments yet to be announced.
Now I pulled this from a stream of a dozen quotes you made, going back and forth with another poster. I have bolded the portion you got wrong. That is unless you don't believe in the justice system...then again you're wingy enough not to...*chuckles*. I'll go get a few more...kind of like shooting fish in a barrel on a cold Saturday afternoon....
 
lol ok......but may take a while, you claimed a lot of bullshit in those three threads. Maybe I should wait a day, so you can go curate some of them?
Go find the one that you can prove is wrong and get back to me.
 
Go find the one that you can prove is wrong and get back to me.
LOL I just posted four now, three you're wrong, and one is outstanding, awaiting an answer on a report that will never see the light of day...but I am not trying to show you, I am just putting it out there for the audience of Lit members who come through and read these threads....
 
Back
Top