Byron In Exile
Frederick Fucking Chopin
- Joined
- May 3, 2002
- Posts
- 66,591
A guy who's been stone deaf for 10 years writes the ultimate symphony.
What's that about?
What's that about?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Definitely a by-product.Smiley777 said:Irony?
But have you ever looked at the score of Beethoven's 9th symphony? It is complex beyond belief. And he never was able to hear any of it.
I think that he, like Mozart and other legends, could hear it in their heads. That's the only way they could write them. The whole orchestra playing music in their heads. Amazing thought.Shadwann2 said:That must have been so frustrating for him! He must have known how great it is, but to never be able to hear it for himself....so sad!![]()
Mozart had perfect pitch, Beethoven did not.Coolville said:I think that he, like Mozart and other legends, could hear it in their heads.
Sorry, I'm not a baseball fan...Byron In Exile said:Mozart had perfect pitch, Beethoven did not.
But, at the end of the day, we all have gut feelings and emotions and that is music.
When he wrote his 7th symphony, in 1811, he was already pressing his head against his piano in order to hear what he was playing. By the 8th, in 1814, he was practically stone deaf. He wrote nothing for 10 years, and then, in 1824, published his 9th symphony. He became ill in December 1825, and died in March 1826. There were sketches for a 10th symphony found amongst his papers.Shadwann2 said:That must have been so frustrating for him! He must have known how great it is, but to never be able to hear it for himself....so sad!![]()
That would have been Beethoven.juicylips said:Immortal Beloved? or was that a different composer?
Maybe he was unencumbered by sound and able to hear pure music in his "mind's ear."Byron In Exile said:A guy who's been stone deaf for 10 years writes the ultimate symphony.
What's that about?
Byron In Exile said:That would have been Beethoven.
I never saw that movie.
Something like that apparently happened.kotori said:Maybe he was unencumbered by sound and able to hear pure music in his "mind's ear."
I've had that one bookmarked, but oftentimes such movies are such painful distortions of history, that I'm hesitant to see them. I thought "Amadeus" was a good movie, though, in spite of being somewhat historically inaccurate.juicylips said:I did see it on video a few years ago at my brothers insistence.
I enjoyed it.
Byron In Exile said:I've had that one bookmarked, but oftentimes such movies are such painful distortions of history, that I'm hesitant to see them. I thought "Amadeus" was a good movie, though, in spite of being somewhat historically inaccurate.
The only successful adaptation from book to screen is the godfather.juicylips said:I feel the same way when some of my favorite books are made into movies. Even if they are fiction, I like for them to at least follow the basic outline of the story. I get more out of reading than watching a film.
I have never seen "Amadeus". I remember it winning an Oscar years back.
Disappointment is common, but the feeling you got from the book can never be reproduced on celluloid. You have to distance yourself from the book and regard the story in a whole other art form.
Coolville said:You have to distance yourself from the book and regard the story in a whole other art form.