Because it's too short to post...

Vermilion

Original Flavour
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Posts
7,379
Do you ever hear a piece of music, a song, or see a picture that is so beautiful it almost makes your heart break with the poignancy of it? Hallelujah came on the radio today, whilst I drove through damp green-grey fields and the limp winter hopelessness of the view combined with the music to create a great swell of achey sadness in me that rose up and choked me. It was that particular kind of sadness to which there is a sort of sweet pleasure when you indulge it. You wallow and revel in the strength of your feelings and the powerful sense of melancholia. This proves it, you think to yourself, I am a living, feeling being with powers of sensitivity and empathy far beyond the norm. I must be truly special to be so moved by art.

You feel the same when you sit down in front of your keyboard, or your easel, or your computer. Surely a soul so moved by art must be able to create something that moves other, special human beings like yourself? You feel turgid and swollen with emotion and ideas and the passionate, painful longing to create: to make a lasting testimony to your specialness, something that will make sure you are never forgotten.

This, after all, is what inspires so many to create, whether it is art or the next generation of snotty-nosed humans – the longing for perpetuity. You are not so special, after all, for everyone wishes to live forever in some small way. I might write my heart and soul onto the blinking screen of a computer, certain that something I say will strike a chord and connect: that children in generations to come will be faced with my books and essays and told to seek out hidden meanings in my choice of terminology.

You might choose to compose a ballad; a love song that will have more resonance than Yesterday, or I Will Always Love You. Someone else might try to photograph key moments of human interaction – those precious seconds when the human subject drops the mask we all wear from day to day and lets some of their soul and spirit shine through. The uninspired (or inspired depending upon your personal viewpoint) might consider the production of rug-rats to be the most worthy way to gain a little immortality, their genes passed down through generation after generation. It is, however, only in the raising of these little miracles that genius can shine through: if you can produce a truly useful human being at the end of eighteen or twenty years then perhaps you have succeeded – or is that success theirs to claim? After all, each of us can, in the end, only be responsible for our own self.

I still have an image burned into my memory that makes me melt and I am furious at myself for not super-glueing a camera to my hand so that I would have been able to capture it. The man I love, all muscled, six-plus foot of him, sitting stock-still on the sofa, face suffused with love, whilst his tiny nephew lies belly to belly on his front. His round, baby face is slack and flushed with sleep, a small stream of drool trickling down from his rosy, open mouth, his fat fingers clutching a handful of best-shirt.

Such musings make me both smile and grimace, for whilst this diatribe is no doubt thoughtful to some extent, it doesn’t express half of what I had hoped it would when I was driving. Goodness knows why being in a car should inspire me to such profound thoughts anyway – well, more profound than wondering what to cook for dinner tonight which is what I am more usually occupied with. The last essay I wrote on a similar vein - though something tells me it was both more revealing and more profound - was also conceived during a short car journey, whilst the trees and people rushed by in a blur. Perhaps it is that temporary sensation of isolation that occurs because you are so close to others, but enclosed within the separate sphere of a car, or perhaps it is the transitory feeling occasioned by the nature of a car-journey: a neither here nor there thing. Trains do something very similar although, perhaps it is the rhythmic motion of a train on its tracks, train journeys more usually inspire me to poetry.

Some days my emotions seem so very close to the surface that they must be expressed and repressing them leads to a sort of mental constipation that is as unhealthy as the physical sort. As stream of consciousness writing goes, this is an elegant example, but seems to express an entirely different consciousness from that I was thinking. This is, perhaps, more a stream of unconsciousness…



----------------------------------
ETA: I've actually faffed around with it so much now that it *is* long enough to post properly - just!
Will still leave it here though, otherwise there'll just be an empty thread :D
 
Last edited:
This may sound entirely frivolous but I assure you the emotions travelling through me at the time are both well worn and born fresh each time.

Sitting in the kop-end at Elland road just as the team emerges and they play 'Marching on together' over the tannoy. Heart felt voices joining off key and shouted raucously through the verses and then at the chorus an entire wall of sound erupts around the pitch. Not just a football song to me, something more profound and linked to something else in my life but hearing, joining and being a part of 25,000 voices is something which is unavailable anywhere else.

And that photograph you wished you'd taken, I actually have it except that the roles are reversed. Taken many years ago it is I that is asleep, drooling face entirely relaxed and my youngest son, nestled in my arms and gazing at my closed eyes.
 
Cool.

During our lives, I think all of us have "peak experiences;" each and every one of us would dearly love to somehow capture and bottle those moments. Yet, we must accept that the rare nexus is almost always a singular combination of place, light, sound, and company.

Occasionally, we're lucky enough to have a camera with us- I've made a point of attempting to capture some of those times on camera- and I've learned by frustrating experience that it's impossible to bring home. A camera simply cannot capture and cannot translate the chance encounter, be it the magical, transcendant, serendipity of finding oneself in the midst of a huge herd of porpoise whilst on a tradewind passage, the rush of standing atop a mountain peak after the struggle of ascent, the image of a loved one, or rounding the apex of the Mulsanne turn at Le Mans.

You are lucky. Consider that you have the moment safely stored in the best archive of all- your memory.


 
TRYSAIL.

If you subscribe to Gerald Edelman's theory, there is no such thing as memory. There is only recognition and association. What we call memory is one recognition triggering others via their associations...like a game of pinball in chain-reaction style at the speed of nerve impulses. Mistaken identity is maybe the best example of the process.

VERMILION

What I find amazing is how some experiences fail to affect some people. I'm certain they do not get from the experience what you get. It's like they have cheap Chinese radios or tv's for minds. The sensitivity and range and dynamics are severely restricted inside their heads.
 
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
VERMILION

What I find amazing is how some experiences fail to affect some people. I'm certain they do not get from the experience what you get. It's like they have cheap Chinese radios or tv's for minds. The sensitivity and range and dynamics are severely restricted inside their heads.


See, told you I was special ;)
<preens>
 
VERMILION

Yes.

The marvelous aspect of art is how each artist captures different facets of experience and translates it into the common language. The best artists go further, translating experience into visual, linguistic, tactile, or auditory tales that package simple truths.
 
trysail said:
and I've learned by frustrating experience that it's impossible to bring home. A camera simply cannot capture and cannot translate the chance encounter


I find myself agreeing for the most part, a photograph rarely brings the moment, it is an artifact. A photograph usually stands alone, representative only of itself. That's not to say that emotion can't be transacted or transmitted through photography but that what it captures is not what is happening, that goes on in the mind.

A couple of years ago when I was taking pictures like a demented tourist in the Louvre I came upon a painting so breathtaking to me, that I simply refused to take a photograph, knowing, or at least feeling, that it would somehow demean the original. I had shots of The Mona Lisa, Rodin's The Thinker, Whistler's mother but I just couldn't bring myself to abuse this one painting. (obviously I wish now that I had, but at the time I was caught in the frame and couldn't leave)
 
I had an experience this morning that typifies the fleeting moments that remain forever in your mind.

I was on an errand when a Red Tail Hawk swooped in front of my windshield and landed on a chain link fence.

I made a quick uey and pulled up to within six feet of it. It eyed me and proceeded to preen its feathers. I watched it for a good three minutes before remembering I had my camera phone in my pocket.

I slowly reached for it but the movement spooked the bird and it took off.

I know pictures would not do it justice, but I regret not taking a few.

But the memory burns brightly. And that is enough.
 
Back
Top