Bas..........................
- Thread starter putzpotus
- Start date
phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
French? Never.I thought for a sec. that BB was talking posh'n french,
until I saw the "turd" thing.
He still eats "freedom fries".
bluemoves01
Really Experienced
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Posts
- 159
It could be said you deserve what you get with your unique gun laws.
someone from UK shouldnt talk
bluemoves01
Really Experienced
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Posts
- 159
Of cause not. We speak the truth.
Oh and free speech
Oh and free speech
Of cause not. We speak the truth.
Oh and free speech
you dont have free speech (unless you are a Muslim)
dont shit on us
bluemoves01
Really Experienced
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Posts
- 159
Christian here so i dont believe in guns and shooting your neighbour.
Opps that will touch a nerve.
Opps that will touch a nerve.
bluemoves01
Really Experienced
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Posts
- 159
I had a poll and none of them own a gun. I did already know that and its why i feel safe.
You only need one nutter in a comunity with a gun no matter what religion if any.
Keep looking over your shoulder.
You only need one nutter in a comunity with a gun no matter what religion if any.
Keep looking over your shoulder.
JustaSCOUNDREL
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2010
- Posts
- 1,750
I am assuming you are referring to the U.S. Constitution and the first ten amendments to said document. The U.S. Constitution is a rather unique document it that the original lays out what the government may do in only 4,543 words. (You may want to compare those few words with the Proposed new EU Constitution.
What, in my mind makes it unusual, is almost immediately after its adoption 10 amendments to said Constitution were adopted Those 10 are called the Bill of Rights and they lay out several things the government may not to or what the governed may not be forbidden from doing.
Here is a link to the U.S. Bill of Rights. Most of things listed in the Bill of Rights were things denied by George III to the English citizens of America.
http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/
Here ids the strange law you are referring to. George III did not forbid the individual ownership of guns although after Lexington, Concord he may have wished he had.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Last edited:
Hard_Rom
Northumbrian Skald
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2014
- Posts
- 13,623
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Which was all well and good when the US did not intend on having a standing army. Isn't the National Guard supposed to be the well regulated militia.
Is there a well regulated militia? Or is there an armed mob? Which protects the constitution better?
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/13786-the-founding-fathers-vs-the-gun-nuts
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Which was all well and good when the US did not intend on having a standing army. Isn't the National Guard supposed to be the well regulated militia.
Is there a well regulated militia? Or is there an armed mob? Which protects the constitution better?
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/13786-the-founding-fathers-vs-the-gun-nuts
MrRandyWatson
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2013
- Posts
- 943
Amendment II looks like it's written by that guy from Malcolm in the Middle who can't finish a sentence without gasping for air, seeing as how it has at least one unnecessary comma and perhaps two. For over 200 years, people couldn't figure out if it meant people had the right to carry guns as individuals or as, say, strictly in a militia capacity. And if I recall correctly, the vote was 5-4 in favor of individual rights. So it's That. Damn. Close. And yet people seem to think that it's not so much one's right to be armed as it is one's obligation to do so.
