LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Bas..........................

Clever. If you deny that he has a father, that makes him American.
 
"More Mass Shootings have Occurred under Obama's Watch than any other President".:cool:
 
I thought for a sec. that BB was talking posh'n french,
until I saw the "turd" thing.:rolleyes::D
 
Christian here so i dont believe in guns and shooting your neighbour.

Opps that will touch a nerve.
 
I had a poll and none of them own a gun. I did already know that and its why i feel safe.

You only need one nutter in a comunity with a gun no matter what religion if any.

Keep looking over your shoulder.
 
bluemoves01 said:
It could be said you deserve what you get with your unique gun laws.
Click to expand...

I am assuming you are referring to the U.S. Constitution and the first ten amendments to said document. The U.S. Constitution is a rather unique document it that the original lays out what the government may do in only 4,543 words. (You may want to compare those few words with the Proposed new EU Constitution.

What, in my mind makes it unusual, is almost immediately after its adoption 10 amendments to said Constitution were adopted Those 10 are called the Bill of Rights and they lay out several things the government may not to or what the governed may not be forbidden from doing.

Here is a link to the U.S. Bill of Rights. Most of things listed in the Bill of Rights were things denied by George III to the English citizens of America.

http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/

Here ids the strange law you are referring to. George III did not forbid the individual ownership of guns although after Lexington, Concord he may have wished he had.

Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
 
Last edited:
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Which was all well and good when the US did not intend on having a standing army. Isn't the National Guard supposed to be the well regulated militia.

Is there a well regulated militia? Or is there an armed mob? Which protects the constitution better?

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/13786-the-founding-fathers-vs-the-gun-nuts
 
Hard_Rom said:
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Which was all well and good when the US did not intend on having a standing army. Isn't the National Guard supposed to be the well regulated militia.

Is there a well regulated militia? Or is there an armed mob? Which protects the constitution better?

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/13786-the-founding-fathers-vs-the-gun-nuts
Click to expand...

Amendment II looks like it's written by that guy from Malcolm in the Middle who can't finish a sentence without gasping for air, seeing as how it has at least one unnecessary comma and perhaps two. For over 200 years, people couldn't figure out if it meant people had the right to carry guns as individuals or as, say, strictly in a militia capacity. And if I recall correctly, the vote was 5-4 in favor of individual rights. So it's That. Damn. Close. And yet people seem to think that it's not so much one's right to be armed as it is one's obligation to do so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
The US Army Has Been Cheating Its Soldiers
Replies
7
Views
192
Politruk
P
F
Ma mere
Replies
1
Views
873
jacksexw2
J
JenniferSmithJones
Funny facts about humans, mammals, and genetics
Replies
1
Views
61
HectorBidon
HectorBidon
A
WTF fetish.. .
Replies
10
Views
123
Ash999
A
Brains_N_Boobs
Let's not band together to STOP Girlspreading!
Replies
12
Views
115
Nay_Nay01
N
Back
Top