Barack Obama’s EPA is going to tax the rain in the hilariously ironically nick-named

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
Marylanders, Get Ready to Pay the ‘Rain Tax’




Barack Obama’s EPA is going to tax the rain in the hilariously ironically nick-named “Free State.”


In 2010 the Obama administration’s Environmental Protection Agency ordered Maryland to reduce stormwater runoff into the Chesapeake Bay so that nitrogen levels fall 22 percent and phosphorus falls 15 percent from current amounts. The price tag: $14.8 billion.




And where do we get the $14.8 billion? By taxing so-called “impervious surfaces,” anything that prevents rain water from seeping into the earth (roofs, driveways, patios, sidewalks, etc.) thereby causing stormwater run off. In other words, a rain tax.

Maryland voted overwhelmingly to re-elect Obama. So in this case, the rain may not be falling on the just and unjust alike.


The EPA ordered Maryland to raise the money (an unfunded mandate), Maryland ordered its 10 largest counties to raise the money (another unfunded mandate) and, now, each of those counties is putting a local rain tax in place by July 1.

So, if you live in Montgomery, Prince George’s, Howard, Anne Arundel, Carroll, Harford, Charles, Frederick, Baltimore counties or Baltimore city, you’ll be paying a rain tax on your next property tax bill.

Well, you ask, “How on earth can the government know how much impervious surface I own?” Answer: It’s not on earth, it’s in the sky. Thanks to satellite imagery and geographic information systems, Big Brother can measure your roof and driveway (and you thought drones were only used for killing terrorists).

And what Big Brother can do, Big Brother will do.


OK, once the counties raise this money, how is it spent? The state law is kind of squishy. It can be spent to build and maintain stream and wetland restoration projects. And, of course, a lot of it will go to “monitoring, inspection, enforcement, review of stormwater management plans and permit applications and mapping of impervious surfaces.” In other words, hiring more bureaucrats to administer the rain tax program.

It can also be spent on “public education and outreach” (whatever that means) and on “grants to nonprofit organizations” (i.e. to the greenies who pushed the tax through the various levels of government).

Much more at the link. Including this:


tate lawmakers exempted government-owned property from the rain tax but imposed it on religions and nonprofits (which own big roofs and parking lots).
 
Maryland destroyed the ecology of the Chesapeake Bay with their state's pollution runoff, violating EPA regulations that have been around for a very long time. The EPA ordered them to clean up the damage they've caused, not all of it but enough where they return to an acceptable level of pollution. The price tag is around $14.8 billion dollars.

So where do they come up with the money? They could not pay for it and just add $15 billion to their state's debt but that's a terrible idea. They could tax everyone equally but that would shaft people who live in little apartments and give larger land owners, businesses, etc a pass.

So they decided to tax based on the square footage of land ownership, counting only paved land that's the primary cause of the runoff. Off the top of my head I can't think of a fairer way to allocate the cost. Let's hear your ideas.
 
That must be where you live, since you cared to notice it.

Why the fuck don't you have a rain barrel?
 
The money needs to be raised to comply with the EPAs mandate, but this seems like a silly way to do it because most of the pollutants in the bay come from agricultural run-off (a good portion of it from Pennsylvania), not impervious surfaces.

Since the 70s, run-off from impervious surfaces has been regulated (rightly) by the Clean Water Act. All construction projects have sediment controls during construction, and post-construction the run-off is controlled with impoundments. You can't get a building permit without these engineering aspects as part of the design.

At the end of the day though, it's just another little annoyance of living in a rich state. Two years ago us shlubs here in MoCo had to start paying a tax if we wanted plastic bags to carry our groceries home... under the guise of to 'protect the bay." At first the bag tax was a slush fund for the local pols, but then people quit using plastic bags and the tax dried up. Our gas tax was also increased this year because those of us that listened to the government and reduced our oil consumption actually did that and now the state is running out of money to build bike lanes and the like. I have no doubt that soon the bikers are going to have to pay a registration fee for their bikes.

Such is life.
 
It's also interesting that for years and years DC has been in violation of the CWA because their sewer system was built 200 years ago and was designed with a "combined sewer overflow", which means that the street drains went the same place as the sewer drains. When it rains hard, the street drains overwhelm the treatment plant and the excess goes into the Anacostia river (excess being sewer and run-off).

DC just started construction of a huge tunnel to store the excess water in until the treatment plant can catch up and process it. I think that project is going to cost about 15 billion. I'm not sure where the money is coming from. Probably from tax payers in Iowa.
 
Maryland destroyed the ecology of the Chesapeake Bay with their state's pollution runoff, violating EPA regulations that have been around for a very long time. The EPA ordered them to clean up the damage they've caused, not all of it but enough where they return to an acceptable level of pollution. The price tag is around $14.8 billion dollars.

So where do they come up with the money? They could not pay for it and just add $15 billion to their state's debt but that's a terrible idea. They could tax everyone equally but that would shaft people who live in little apartments and give larger land owners, businesses, etc a pass.

So they decided to tax based on the square footage of land ownership, counting only paved land that's the primary cause of the runoff. Off the top of my head I can't think of a fairer way to allocate the cost. Let's hear your ideas.

PM me your address

I will Fed Ex more shovels for you to dig deeper holes
 
There is no end to liberal madness.
The Beatles were right.

If you drive a car, I'll tax the street,
If you try to sit, I'll tax your seat.
If you get too cold I'll tax the heat,
If you take a walk, I'll tax your feet.
 
Here's another interesting tid-bit:

About 10 years ago Maryland introduced a "flush tax." This tax was imposed on people with septic tanks because, it was argued, the septic tanks' effluent eventually went into the bay. The people in Western Maryland and along the coast squealed like a stuck pig. Western Maryland drains into the Ohio river and eventually the Gulf of Mexico. The coast drains into the ocean.

Flush tax, rain tax, bag tax... we should pave over the bay and be done with it.
 
damn RIGHT!:mad:

fuck the crabs n shit

we can always go the the SuperMarket to get the shit:mad:

The biggest economic activity related to the Bay is the Port of Baltimore. I wonder if they chip in anything. Probably not. Baltimore pols are too powerful for such shenanigans. Our two Senators representing the State of Baltimore would never stand for it.
 
Back
Top