AwkwardMD AI Rejection Help Desk

[SkyBubble]

It seems, given the patterns of stories we hear, that the first rejection happens because of automated criteria (read: the AI detector) and that subsequent submissions with a note (like yours) will sit in the pending queue until she can take a look at the work.

If she rejects it again, the step after that is to enlist the aid of a volunteer editor from the site (read: Literotica's Volunteer Editor Program from this Editors Forum, not just anyone who can do editing work) and try to get one of them to vouch for you, using the evidence you have.

This from the rejection notice: "Please see this FAQ for more information: https://literotica.com/faq/publishing/publishing-ai NOTE: the sentence at the end of this response [[Please feel free to re-submit the story after a Volunteer Editor has examined it, or after you've made revisions.]] does not apply to stories rejected for content or AI issues. Volunteer Editors can help only with grammar, punctuation, and story mechanics issues and are not equipped to deal with AI issues. You may resubmit after you’ve made revisions."

 

[AwkwardMD]

@SkyBubble Yes. Two people are saying different things. You have correctly identified a gap.

 

[SkyBubble]

@SkyBubble Yes. Two people are saying different things. You have correctly identified a gap.

@dmallord is quoting Lit, however.

 

[AwkwardMD]

@dmallord is quoting Lit, however.

Feel free to go and get help from any of the other users volunteering their time to help anyone with an AI rejection.

 

[SkyBubble]

The point of putting those two quotes together isthat what you said is contradicted by what @dmallord posted, which comes from Lit itself.

 

[AwkwardMD]

Okay

 

[GLawrence]

Thank you, Awkard, for the information. It's helps to know the defective "AI" detector is also blocking other authors, so this is just a screw up and not something personal.

 

[ElectricBlue]

Thank you, Awkard, for the information. It's helps to know the defective "AI" detector is also blocking other authors, so this is just a screw up and not something personal.

It's never something personal, it's always a cock up of some sort.

The site doesn't know you, your story is one of hundreds each day on the conveyor belt. There's absolutely no reason to think the site editor is going to zoom in on any individual and say, I don't like you, I'm not going to process your story.

 

[dmallord]

Well, that didn't take long. I submitted the rewrite, the See Dick, See Sally version, on the 18th, and it was posted early on the 21st, around 2 am according to the timeline. That's much faster than usual for Lit to handle resubmissions, I think.

Awk, I did add the explanation that it was my own writing and not substantially generated by AI. I also stated that I used Grammarly for spelling, punctuation, and some verb tense agreement.

So far, I have three likes and one new follower. It has some formatting errors. I forgot to allow for extra spaces when using an italic font that jams things together. But let's see how others view it.

Edit: The rejection was a month ago. It took me a while to get it revised and back to Lit. Attn & FYI regarding posting success: @da804 and @SkyBubble