Author on trial for "insulting Turkishness"

minsue

Gosling
Joined
Apr 27, 2002
Posts
22,062
UA prof faces Turkish trial for novel

Mike Cronin
The Arizona Republic
Jul. 15, 2006 12:00 AM


Marly Rusoff, a New York-based literary agent, says it's like writing about the Holocaust in Germany and being jailed for "insulting Germanness."

But in Turkey, it's the law.

Elif Shafak, a University of Arizona assistant professor of Near Eastern studies whom Rusoff represents, has been charged with "insulting Turkishness" under Turkey's Article 301 of the Turkish Criminal Code. If convicted, the author could go to prison.

Shafak's novel, The Bastard of Istanbul, deals, in part, with the conflict between the Turks and Armenians that began in 1915. A mass evacuation that lasted until 1923 resulted in up to 1.5 million Armenian deaths. Most American and Western scholars categorize those deaths as genocide, saying the Turks massacred the Armenians.

In Shafak's novel, one of the characters refers to "Turkish butchers."

The Turkish government and some international historians, however, reject the genocide claim.

Turkey maintains that many Armenians died of starvation, disease and exposure on forced marches to Syria. Those marches were in retaliation against the Christian minority for reportedly collaborating with Russia during World War I. Turkey also says the death toll is inflated.

Although Shafak's case has been reported in the Turkish media, prosecutors and court officials there have not confirmed it.

Shafak, 35, on leave from UA, is not incarcerated. A trial date has not been set, the author told the Arizona Daily Star.

"No Turkish writer has ever written about the Armenian genocide," Rusoff said. "She (Shafak) wrote about it (while living in Tucson). It was translated into Turkish. It was published there first in March and became a bestseller. That's when trouble started."

Shafak's first novel, written in English, The Saint of Incipient Insanities, was published by Farrar Straus & Giroux in 2004.

The European Union has frequently warned Turkey that its efforts to join the bloc could be hampered by Article 301, which sets out penalties for insulting the Turkish Republic, its officials or "Turkishness." It has been used to bring charges against dozens of journalists, publishers and scholars.

Shafak said her book "questions two big taboos, one of them a political taboo - the Armenian Question - and the other a sexual taboo - incest. So it was not easy to digest for some people and it caused a lot of stir."
 
The Turkish do tend to be very touchy about that. While we were over there, rule #1 was: Don't talk smack about Attatürk. Rule #2 was: Don't talk smack about the military. #3, of course: Don't discuss too much of the Turkish past with the population. Our professor warned us to take those three rules very seriously, because he did not have any desire to bail any of us out of a Turkish jail.

I recommend the book "Crescent and Star" for those who'd like to read more about Turkish history, and how the government often suppresses voices that question the military, demonstrators, even families of missing soldiers who demand to know where those soldiers went. It's a fascinating read.
 
In the US (at least in Texas) if you defame beef, you have to go to civil court. In the middle east, if you defame Turkey you go to criminal court.

Got it.
 
It's kinda fascinating to compare USA and Turkey.

Turkey has the death penalty. So does a lot of the states in USA.
Turkey doesn't allow you to critisize the government. Neither does USA - atleast not if you're trying to critisize the sitting president by holding up banners saying "Down with the president" while he's driving by (people have been instructed to take their protests far away, so the president won't have to see them!).
 
Svenskaflicka said:
(people have been instructed to take their protests far away, so the president won't have to see them!).
No, the real reason is that the president gets confused when he tries to read the signs.
 
But back to the point of the thread...

Turkey is often held up as one of the more liberal of the Islamic countries. It's important to be reminded every once in a while that it is very much a relative thing.
 
Turkey is a sovereign country. The Turks make the laws in Turkey. I don't agree with some of the Turkish laws and I know that most of you do not agree with some of the Turkish laws. However, the Turkish laws are the laws there and you had damn well better obey them. You don't want to know about Turkish prisons.
 
R. Richard said:
Turkey is a sovereign country. The Turks make the laws in Turkey. I don't agree with some of the Turkish laws and I know that most of you do not agree with some of the Turkish laws. However, the Turkish laws are the laws there and you had damn well better obey them. You don't want to know about Turkish prisons.
I just can't comprehend why she went back to Turkey.

The other thing I can't wrap my head around is, if it's illegal to write about it, why is it legal to buy & sell said novel? It is a bestseller in Turkey, after all. Why is that legal then? :confused:
 
Svenskaflicka said:
It's kinda fascinating to compare USA and Turkey.

Turkey has the death penalty. So does a lot of the states in USA.
Turkey doesn't allow you to critisize the government. Neither does USA - atleast not if you're trying to critisize the sitting president by holding up banners saying "Down with the president" while he's driving by (people have been instructed to take their protests far away, so the president won't have to see them!).

You are allowed to criticize the president and any members of Congress, etc. I see and read about people doing just that, sometimes while being protected by police so it must not be illegal.

That was not always so. In the presidency of John Adams there was something called the Sedition Act. This made it against the law to criticize the president or anybody else and people went to jail for violating the law. The law was declared unconstitutional and everybody was pardoned by Jefferson but it was the law for a couple of years.
 
SweetPrettyAss said:
You are allowed to criticize the president and any members of Congress, etc. I see and read about people doing just that, sometimes while being protected by police so it must not be illegal.

That was not always so. In the presidency of John Adams there was something called the Sedition Act. This made it against the law to criticize the president or anybody else and people went to jail for violating the law. The law was declared unconstitutional and everybody was pardoned by Jefferson but it was the law for a couple of years.

I was on another forum a couple of weeks ago and someone suggested it was time to bring the Alien and Sedition Acts back.

Damn near put my fist through the screen.
 
Back
Top