Audience: quantity vs quality

How do you assess the success of your stories on Literotica?

  • By the number of readers

    Votes: 4 15.4%
  • By the voting score

    Votes: 6 23.1%
  • By the quality of the feedback I get

    Votes: 19 73.1%
  • By what I personally feel about the story

    Votes: 15 57.7%

  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .

SimonBrooke

Literotica Guru
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Posts
1,139
This comes out of some correspondence I've been having with a person I edit for. She is trying to develop the confidence to write her own erotica; personally I think she has very interesting ideas and writes well about some aspects of sexuality which are very fresh and uncliched. I'm trying to give her the confidence to develop those stories with her own voice. She counters to me that the stories that she's published so far on Literotica which are directly about the things which interest her have few readers and poor vote scores, whereas the stories she's written based on other people's plots have had many more readers and have scored better.

I wrote back to her:

/-----
I'm inclined not to be swayed by that statistic. Firstly, I don't believe the Literotica audience as a whole is discerning (although it contains some very discerning people). Also, that statistic increments, as I understand it, when people click on the title of your story, before they've read it.

...this is a question about why we write. And as (in my opinion) the process of writing is actually secondary, of why we tell stories. We tell stories to please an audience. We tell stories to express some truth we experience about the world. We tell stories in order to develop our own skills as story tellers. We tell stories in order to experience mastery of the art of story-telling.

If you look at my stories on Literotica, you'll see there's quite a lot of 'H' marks:

http://english.literotica.com:81/stories/memberpage.php?uid=486920&page=submissions

The two that /don't/ have 'H' marks (apart from the new chapter of Pornstar which is new on today and hasn't had time) are the two that are, in my opinion, the good ones, the important ones. Catriona you know about. Workshop is something I worked very hard at, and which I care about intensely - and I think it's good. It hasn't had many readers. It only has one comment. And it doesn't have a great score. But - although I'd like it to be better - in my mind it is much closer to what I want to achieve than Pornstar, which is playing to the Literotica gallery and is essentially nothing more than a bit of fun.

Yes, we need an audience. Writing without an audience is in the worst sense masturbatory. It is empty, hollow, unsatisfying. But that doesn't mean we need to pander to just any audience. I'd love to build an audience which is appreciative to the sorts of stories I want to tell, and I'm thinking about how I would go about that. But in the meantime, provided I get some intelligent feedback from some readers, and that the balance of the intelligent feedback is approving, that's good enough for me. I don't feel the need to play to the groundlings of the Literotica audience.

Rehashing trivial sex cliches is the easiest way to high scores on Literotica, or so at least it seems to me. The easiest way to get a quantitatively large audience. But it isn't going to express your personal truth, and it isn't going to hone your skills, and it isn't going to help you experience mastery. Personally, so long as I have an audience, I'd rather have a smaller, more discerning audience than a larger, less discerning one.
\-----

So... am I right? Or am I an intellectual snob? Or both?
 
All the above.

I am vain, so I relish public acclaim in the form of high vote and read numbers. I am a social animal, so I am affirmed and warmed by words of praise in PCs and emails. I am proud, so take satisfaction is creating something that I think is good.
 
Literally NONE of my stories have a great deal of "stroke appeal". That in itself limits the number of reads I will get. I suppose if I really put my mind into it I could write real porn, but it's not what I do. I love humor and the occasional sweet romance like "Leah's Thanksgiving".

I may not get the thousands of reads some do, but I have gained a small, loyal and decerning following who enjoy what I write. And that's enough.
 
Not as much the voting score (as long as it's not a complete disaster) as the voting numbers. Most of the time, a vote means that someone actually read the story all the way through, and bothered to have an opinion.

I've seen that some people have votes on their stories in the over 100 balpark. I'm giddy everytime I see my vote count on a story rise from 20-something to 20-something + 1. :rolleyes:

Comments and feeback are nice too, of course. For the same reason. It's proof, or as close to proof as we can get, that somebody read the damn thing and had a reaction.
 
SimonBrooke said:
Rehashing trivial sex cliches is the easiest way to high scores on Literotica, or so at least it seems to me. The easiest way to get a quantitatively large audience. But it isn't going to express your personal truth, and it isn't going to hone your skills, and it isn't going to help you experience mastery. Personally, so long as I have an audience, I'd rather have a smaller, more discerning audience than a larger, less discerning one.

My only concern with the scores is that higher scores generate more readers. But my goal is to generate enough emotion to inspire a vote or feedback; to stand out from the crowd enough that the readers are moved to comment. Whether the comments are good or bad isn't as important as the fact I affected them enough to make them comment/vote.
 
I use scores as a barometer of the general mood of the readers. I use the feedback, good, bad, and indifferent, to help polish the piece.

I can guarantee that if something is on Lit, it's an edited but not completed draft. My finished stuff doesn't go on Lit- it goes out to the wide world of "waiting to be published." The only possible exception to that rule is Scream, written, polished, and tailored specifically for Lit.

The bottom line fore me is simple: If I wanted approval, I'd be writing Sunday School Pamphlets. As I'm obviously not... everythign else is just persepctive.
 
I use the last three. A lot of my stuff is in categories that don't get a huge number of readers.

But I do love the feedback.
 
Roxanne Appleby said:
All the above.

I am vain, so I relish public acclaim in the form of high vote and read numbers. I am a social animal, so I am affirmed and warmed by words of praise in PCs and emails. I am proud, so take satisfaction is creating something that I think is good.
I'm in the same boat, although I weigh number of readers less heavily than number of votes. I'd rather have a 4.6 with 75 votes than a 4.9 with 15 votes.
 
Liar said:
Not as much the voting score (as long as it's not a complete disaster) as the voting numbers. Most of the time, a vote means that someone actually read the story all the way through, and bothered to have an opinion.

I've seen that some people have votes on their stories in the over 100 balpark. I'm giddy everytime I see my vote count on a story rise from 20-something to 20-something + 1. :rolleyes:

Comments and feeback are nice too, of course. For the same reason. It's proof, or as close to proof as we can get, that somebody read the damn thing and had a reaction.
yep, I voted for "quality of feedback" and i agree with you- the story that has the highest number of votes- and the highest rating, as well- is kind of a "little nothing" in my opinion. I wasn't trying anything new or special. And that highest number of votes is still below 40.

Someone came here a while back to complain about voting sweeps, She said that she lost HUNDREDS of votes- and her stories were down to three and four hundred votes apiece.
well, listen, beeeyotch....
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
A mixture of all of them. The views let me know it's being seen. The votes mean that it moved the reader enough to take the time to vote. The score is a great ego boost (when it's high). The comments can be great to guage the reaction and to see if the readers found anything you overlooked (especially in LW, where the comments can be very in-depth). If any one is off, but the others are high, I still feel like I accomplished something.
 
I believe that a writer of quality on Lit would only ever be concerned with worthy feedback and how they personally feel about a story. An author who is really amazing. Well, they would not have to give a shit about any of the above, particularly on Lit.
 
CharleyH said:
I believe that a writer of quality on Lit would only ever be concerned with worthy feedback and how they personally feel about a story. An author who is really amazing. Well, they would not have to give a shit about any of the above, particularly on Lit.

I'm with ya. Feedback is great, but I know when what I've written is shit and when it isn't.
 
CharleyH said:
I believe that a writer of quality on Lit would only ever be concerned with worthy feedback and how they personally feel about a story. An author who is really amazing. Well, they would not have to give a shit about any of the above, particularly on Lit.

For those of you who are lucky enough to have massive self esteem that's very nice.

For those of us who spent most of our lives around people who never missed a chance to hoof us in the nuts, physically or emotionally, well, we need the feedback.
 
CharleyH said:
I believe that a writer of quality on Lit would only ever be concerned with worthy feedback and how they personally feel about a story. An author who is really amazing. Well, they would not have to give a shit about any of the above, particularly on Lit.
Eh.

An artist who doesn't care about his or her audience is missing the point of the art, imo. It's about communication, and I want to communicate my ideas to as many readers as I can. Numbers are important for the "as many readers as I can" part, and votes tell me how well the "communication" effort is going.
 
JamesSD said:
I'm in the same boat, although I weigh number of readers less heavily than number of votes. I'd rather have a 4.6 with 75 votes than a 4.9 with 15 votes.
Well, the latter wouldn't be a problem: It would be near or at the top of a toplist, and with just 15 votes would be like chum in the water to man-eating trolls. Chomp! Chomp! - A coupla' one-bombs and your dilemma would be solved. :devil:
 
rgraham666 said:
...people who never missed a chance to hoof us in the nuts...
I don't know why, but that expression tickled me to the point of almost spewing coffee outta my nose...LOL...I'm planning on making it part of my regular daily conversation.

The one story, of my own, that I like best and probably enjoyed writing the most,[shameless plug] Otis Revelator [/shameless plug], never got a score above 4.3. It garnered some nice (and one not so nice but not at all rude) feedback and email. Since I'm just really learning the whole "writing game" and am sort of testing the waters here, I'm exstactic that anyone reads my stuff at all LOL
 
cloudy said:
I'm with ya. Feedback is great, but I know when what I've written is shit and when it isn't.
Ah. but shit is subjective. When I think I've written shit, people tell me it's flippin' genius. When I think I have a masterpiece, people tend to think it's boring as hell.

Maybe you have better self knowlegde. :)
 
Stella_Omega said:
Eh.

An artist who doesn't care about his or her audience is missing the point of the art, imo. It's about communication, and I want to communicate my ideas to as many readers as I can. Numbers are important for the "as many readers as I can" part, and votes tell me how well the "communication" effort is going.

That's an attitude I can whole heartedly agree with.

Writing is like sex. It should involve other people. The fewer people involved the closer to masturbation it is.
 
rgraham666 said:
That's an attitude I can whole heartedly agree with.

Writing is like sex. It should involve other people. The fewer people involved the closer to masturbation it is.


Great! So if I don't start getting more reads, does that mean my palms are going to start to get hairy? :cool:

For me, feedback is what I'm looking for - what worked, what didn't, etc. That, to me, means that whatever I've written is something that people have read and has made some sort of impression on them. On the other hand, votes are nice - a little bit of positive reinforcement never hurt anyone and it's a really nice feeling to see a high number of votes and a good score. But it sucks when you see that score plummet (or never rise).

I'm not able to judge whether something I write is good or crap at this point. What I know is that I feel a pretty strong sense of accomplishment when I do finish it. As long as I've done the best that I could with it and it is the story that I want to tell, told in the manner that I want to tell it ... that is enough to make me happy. (Of course, glowing praise makes me happier :cool: )
 
It's only guys' palms that get hairy.

In fact it's the only part of my body I shave.

:confused: :eek: Too Much Information, right? ;)
 
rgraham666 said:
It's only guys' palms that get hairy.

In fact it's the only part of my body I shave.

:confused: :eek: Too Much Information, right? ;)

Ah .. so that explains the stubble when we shook hands. :D
 
Audience: quantity vs quality

It depends. If the story is pure escapist stroke, then I hope it'll get a lot of reads and a good score. If it leans more towards erotic than porn, with a real plot and characters that are more than just fuck-toids, then I'd rather have feedback (both good and bad) from AH'ers.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
 
Rumple Foreskin said:
Audience: quantity vs quality

It depends. If the story is pure escapist stroke, then I hope it'll get a lot of reads and a good score. If it leans more towards erotic than porn, with a real plot and characters that are more than just fuck-toids, then I'd rather have feedback (both good and bad) from AH'ers.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
Welcome back to the concious world RF. Nice to see your .... "back" :catroar:
 
Back
Top