astronomy & space stuff

src

Space Shuttle In Shipshape Condition As Return To Flight Looms

Washington DC (SPX) Mar 11, 2005
When the crew members of the Space Shuttle Discovery lift off later this year from NASA's Kennedy Space Center, Fla., they'll be supported by two years of hard work by tens of thousands of people determined to make the Space Shuttle safer. NASA has upgraded flight hardware, as well as visual tracking and inspection equipment, to ensure the Return to Flight mission is successful.

The Columbia accident revealed a major problem with the insulating foam that covers the External Tank. Investigators found that foam falling off the tank had damaged Columbia's left wing, letting superheated gases inside. Redesigning the External Tank became a top priority in the Agency's Return to Flight work.

NASA engineers made dozens of changes to the tank design, including one to a key mechanism that joins the External Tank with the orbiter. Jutting from the upper third of the tank, the "bipod fitting" is susceptible to icing due to the ultra-cold fuel that tank contains. Until the Columbia accident, the part was protected from ice buildup using thick sheets of foam.

The improved bipod design now excludes using foam and instead relies on electric heaters to keep the area clear. The new fitting design is currently being retrofitted to the 11 existing tanks -- including the one chosen for Discovery's flight -- and will be included on those produced in the future.

Another major safety improvement to the Space Shuttle fleet is the expanded use of enhanced imaging equipment to record the launch of Discovery as it roars into the sky and glides through space.

At Kennedy Space Center, NASA has upgraded the short-, medium-, and long-range tracking camera system around the Center's launch pads 39A and 39B, along with those lining the nearby Atlantic coastline. The addition of nine more camera sites will provide unprecedented views of Discovery's launch, allowing engineers to clearly observe the flight high into the sky.

Discovery itself also received new imaging equipment with the installation of a digital External Tank camera and new "Canadarm" inspection boom.

Making the most of current consumer photography equipment, the orbiter's External Tank camera has been switched from film to a digital model. Located in the rear underbelly of the orbiter, the camera is similar to a standard 35 mm model and snaps a series of photos as the tank separates from the orbiter.

With the previous film camera, flight engineers had to wait until Discovery landed to retrieve the negatives and develop photos. With the simplicity and increased speed of a digital system, the image files will be easily transmitted back to Earth shortly after Discovery reaches space.

Into Orbit And Back To Work


Once in orbit, the visual inspection of Discovery will continue with the help of a new piece of robotic technology. The Canadarm found inside Discovery's payload bay now includes the Canadian-built Orbiter Boom Sensor System. The boom extension houses a camera and laser-powered measuring device that astronauts will use to scan the orbiter's exterior.

The boom attaches to the end of the existing robotic arm and doubles its length to 100 feet long. The extra length will allow the arm to reach around the spacecraft for the best possible views. With the new boom, astronauts will take a good look at features like the orbiter's leading wing edges, which are now closely watched by an advanced monitoring system.

Each of Discovery's leading wing edges are outfitted with 22 temperature sensors to measure how heat is distributed across their spans. Both wings also have 66 accelerometers apiece to detect impacts and gauge their strength and location.

The sensors are highly sensitive and take 20,000 readings per second. This new network of sensors running along the wings provides an electronic nervous system that gives engineers a valuable way to monitor their condition.

Inspection of the wings will continue once Discovery returns to Earth. Technicians will use a proven method called flash thermography, employed to examine the Reinforced Carbon-Carbon panels that make up the wing's leading edges.

The technique starts by applying an intensely hot and bright burst of light to the panels. Technicians then survey the panels with a heat-sensitive infrared camera to see if any flaws appear under stress from the extreme heat. Flash thermography will reveal even small imperfections and offer technicians a powerful tool for keeping an orbiter's wings in shipshape.

On launch day, when the Shuttle's boosters erupt with fiery thrust and shake the Florida sands, the moment will signal the culmination of more than two years of thoughtful planning and hard work to send America's flagship spacecraft streaking back into space on a mission to the world's most unique research platform, the International Space Station.

It's a mission that promises to begin with a safe and exciting reach for the sky and end with an even happier landing.
 
src
http://www.spacedaily.com/images/solar-escape-chart-2002-bg.jpg

Interstellar Pioneers Facing Termination

Los Angeles (SPX) Mar 09, 2005
A little over 13 hours out from Sol, a veteran of the first space age - Voyager 1 - is working quietly in the depths of space as it travels away from our Sun at 17.163 kilometers per second. But now, NASA has told scientists working on these and other older missions that their missions may be terminated in October to save money, reports Nature.

The decision - which NASA officials say is not yet final - has angered space scientists, who are calling calling the moves penny-wise and pound-foolish, and that it is being done without a usual formal science review.

According to Nature, NASA officials told seven mission managers (Voyager, Ulysses, Polar, Wind, Geotail, FAST (Fast Auroral SnapshoT) and TRACE (Transition Region and Coronal Explorer)) that there is now no money to keep their projects operating after the current fiscal year ends in October.

In the past, NASA has occasionally terminated spacecraft that are still working but that have far exceeded their life expectancy, and are no longer returning significant new science data.

Every few years a review by scientists outside NASA ranks the science value of operating missions to help the agency plan which ones should be extended and which ones terminated.

But the panel never suggested that the missions marked as low-ranking in the most recent review should be shut down this year.

For example, Ulysses, launched in 1990 to explore the Sun's polar regions for the first time, was recommended to continue until 2008, and Wind until 2007.

While the Voyagers were recommended for funding until at least 2006, after which they would be reviewed again.

Launched in 1977, Voyagers 1 and 2 are now more than 14 billion and 11 billion kilometres from Earth, respectively. Having visited all the outer planets except Pluto, they are on their final quest - to locate the unknown boundary between the Sun's domain and the realm where interstellar space begins.

Ground antennas are in regular contact with the spacecraft, which are expected to last until at least 2020 before giving out as their plutonium batteries decay. Under NASA's costing, the Voyagers currently need $4.2 million a year in funding for daily operation and data analysis.

Nature quoted Lennard Fisk, a University of Michigan space scientist who chairs the National Academy of Sciences Space Studies Board and is a former head of NASA space science, as saying the cuts were "an extremely foolish thing to do".

Voyager, he says, is entering one of the most interesting scientific phases of its long life as its particle detectors approach the edge of the Solar System. "It doesn't make sense” to turn off Ulysses just as the Sun comes to the end of a 22-year magnetic cycle.

For now, project scientists say they have no choice but to take the threat seriously. Having been told by NASA that there is no money available after October, Stone says, "we are currently developing a plan for shutdown".
 
i think everything in space is cool. i'm really big on unintellectual stargazing.
 
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, EINSTEIN: On March 14, 1879, Albert Einstein was born in Ulm, Germany. No one knew it at the time, but the little-remarked birth heralded a revolution in physics. Next month, Nobel laureates and other top scientists will meet with the public to discuss the problems Einstein solved and the mysteries he left behind.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/09mar_conference.htm
 
AROUND THE BEND: Something exploded on the sun yesterday. We couldn't see the blast itself because it happened behind the sun's eastern limb. But we could see the hot magnetic cloud it hurled into space. Witness this picture from Gary Honis of Conyngham, Pennsylvania:

http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2005/16mar05/honig1.jpg

John Stetson of Falmouth, Maine, saw it, too:

http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2005/16mar05/stetson.jpg

The dramatic twisting loop soared some 240,000 km high, 20 times the diameter of Earth.

What exploded? Possibly a sunspot. We'll see soon enough: the sun's rotation should carry the site around the bend and into view later this week.
 
I got rotten grades in science at school, and I certainly can't hold an informed discussion with a lot of the ppl I see posting here...

But it does drive me crazy sometimes, to think there are literally WORLDS out there for exploration and human expansion...and no one seems to be consciously aware of it, somehow.

Plus I read "The Starship and the Canoe" by Dyson waaaay back when I was young and impressionable, and his report to the Air Force that he could build an atomic interplanetary craft that could take human explorers everywhere in our solar system for the price of ONE Trident submarine has driven me crazy for years! Whether he was exaggerating or not, the government didn't think he was when they buried the project, pulsed nuclear explosions driving craft into space might piss off the Russians...Well, we don't have to worry about pissing off the Russians anymore, but now it seems that people have forgotten that space EXISTS, let alone make them willing to accept appropriations for experimental spacecraft, or face the wrath of neo-environmentalists protesting the use of controlled nuclear blasts for lift...etc etc etc

I would like to live long enough to open up the Help Wanted section and see it divided to "On-Planet" and "Off-Planet" sections...that's all...!
 
ShirKhan said:
I got rotten grades in science at school, and I certainly can't hold an informed discussion with a lot of the ppl I see posting here...

But it does drive me crazy sometimes, to think there are literally WORLDS out there for exploration and human expansion...and no one seems to be consciously aware of it, somehow.

I think one thing that plays into it is we (the US) don't have anyone to compete with over space any more. The primary thing which got us to the moon was we had to beat the USSR. I was hoping China would get a signifcant space program going because it would have the chance of firing backup that competive spirit. Also, dollar for dollar, I think the space race generated as much or more technical advances & refinements as the World Wars of the 20th.

On exploring beyond our solar system or even within it, people just don't see a reason to bother. The average person is overwhelmed with his/her own problems/issues, what it would take in effort and money to send people off world seems like a waste until we solve a lot more problems on Earth first.

Plus I read "The Starship and the Canoe" by Dyson waaaay back when I was young and impressionable, and his report to the Air Force that he could build an atomic interplanetary craft that could take human explorers everywhere in our solar system for the price of ONE Trident submarine has driven me crazy for years! Whether he was exaggerating or not, the government didn't think he was when they buried the project, pulsed nuclear explosions driving craft into space might piss off the Russians...Well, we don't have to worry about pissing off the Russians anymore, but now it seems that people have forgotten that space EXISTS, let alone make them willing to accept appropriations for experimental spacecraft, or face the wrath of neo-environmentalists protesting the use of controlled nuclear blasts for lift...etc etc etc

I would like to live long enough to open up the Help Wanted section and see it divided to "On-Planet" and "Off-Planet" sections...that's all...!

While it is probalby estimated somewhere on the 'net, I can only imagine how many billions to trillion of the DOD's budget goes into maintianing the nukes we have. Definately no reason to have them all any more. To me, the precision targeting we have these days gives us little reason to have a large stockpile of nukes.

If we could reduce the costs of maintaining the nuke stockpile and filter a decent portion to NASA, we likely could see some significant work done. The alternative is to have the corporate sector pick up the ball. I see usefulness in having the corporate sector taking a parallel lead with NASA, but I think if the corporate sector took it over, a lot of interesting things may be bypassed because they would not be profit generating projects.
 
GREEN SKIES: Northern spring is almost here; that means flowers, warmer days ... and greener nights. Spring, like autumn, is aurora season. It's a time of year when (for reasons scientists don't completely understand) the interplanetary magnetic field near Earth tilts farther south than usual, fueling geomagnetic storms and auroras.

Sky watcher Lance Parrish photographed these green auroras over Skiland, Alaska, on March 6th. "As I started the exposure," says Parrish, "a rocket was launched from the University of Alaska's Poker Flat Research Range." Scientists there often launch rockets into auroras to study the inner workings of the beautiful lights. This time, unfortunately, the rocket crashed. The good news: auroras (and opportunities to study them) should be plentiful in the weeks ahead.

So keep an eye on the sky, and have a Happy St. Patrick's Day!

http://www.spaceweather.com/aurora/images2005/06mar05/Parrish.jpg
 
GREEN COMET: Whatever happened to Comet Machholz? In January it was visible to the unaided eye as a green fuzzball gliding across northern skies. Since then the comet has faded ... but not vanished.

"It's still a beautiful comet," says amateur astronomer Mike Holloway who took this picture on March 10th from his observatory in Van Buren, Arkansas:

Shining like a 6th or 7th magnitude star, Comet Machholz is too dim for naked-eye observing. Even so, it's easy to find near Polaris, the North Star. Go outside after sunset, face north, and scan around Polaris using good binoculars or a small telescope. The fuzzy comet is conspicuous against the background of pinpoint stars.

http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2005/17mar05/Holloway1_strip.jpg

http://www.spaceweather.com/images2005/18mar05/skymap_north.gif
 
AURORA SEASON: Northern spring is almost here; that means flowers, warmer days ... and greener nights. Spring, like autumn, is aurora season. It's a time of year when the interplanetary magnetic field near Earth tilts farther south than usual, fueling geomagnetic storms. Auroras can appear even when solar activity is low. Just yesterday Dennis Mammana photographed these green auroras over Fairbanks, Alaska

http://www.spaceweather.com/aurora/images2005/16mar05/Mammana1.jpg http://www.spaceweather.com/aurora/images2005/16mar05/Mammana4.jpg
 
AURORA WATCH: Sometime during the next 48 hours, Earth will enter a solar wind stream flowing from a coronal hole on the sun. This could spark a mild geomagnetic storm and auroras at high latitudes. People in Alaska, Scandinavia and Canada should be alert for green lights in the sky

http://www.spaceweather.com/aurora/images2005/19mar05/Siciliano1.jpg

Above: Auroras near Palmer, Alaska, on March 19th. "I was lucky to catch these reflections in the river," says photographer Robert Siciliano. "Every time the auroras would intensify, someone would drive through the river--yes!--with their cars and trucks, disturbing the surface for several minutes."
 
linuxgeek said:
EASTER SUNDAY: In 325 AD, the Roman Emperor Constantine convened the First Council of Nicaea. The Council's job was to fix the date of Easter, and here is what they decided: Easter falls on the first Sunday after the first full moon of Spring. In other words, today. Happy Easter

http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2005/26mar05/tough.jpg
Wow, that's a beautiful picture. I set it as my wallpaper. Thank you.
 
NSIDE A RAINBOW: Photographer Brian Whittaker of Birmingham, UK, was mystified on March 24th looking at "about brightest rainbow that I had ever seen," he says. The inside of the rainbow was bright, the outside much darker. "I had to invert a section to prove to myself that it wasn't an optical illusion."

http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2005/29mar05/Whittaker_strip2.jpg

Atmospheric optics expert Les Cowley explains the mystery:

"Rainbows are disks of light rather than narrow rings. Millions of raindrops in the sky opposite the sun form rainbows by reflecting sunbeams back to us through a whole range of angles. Each disk brightens sharply towards its edge and is centered on the same point directly opposite the sun. The red disk is largest and violet the smallest. We see rainbow colors where the disk-edges do not quite overlap. Inside the disks, all colors overlap to form white light, which makes the sky inside the rainbow bright. "
 
Subject: A Close Encounter with Jupiter

Space Weather News for April 2, 2005
http://spaceweather.com

When Jupiter rises at sundown on Sunday, April 3rd, the giant planet will
be at its closest to Earth all year long. Step outside, face east and
look toward the horizon. To the naked eye, Jupiter resembles a very bright
star, almost three times brighter than Sirius. Seen through a backyard
telescope, that "star" reveals itself as a full-fledged world with clouds,
spots and moons.

If you miss Jupiter on April 3rd, don't worry. It will remain close to
Earth, bright and easy to see, for many weeks to come. Visit
Spaceweather.com for sky maps and images.
 
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/01apr_solareclipse.htm?list1059212

Solar Eclipse


On April 8th in North America crescent-shaped sunbeams will dapple the ground during a partial solar eclipse.

April 1, 2005: No kidding: A total eclipse can change your life.

In the middle of the day, darkness falls. Birds stop singing. The sun's corona pops out and shimmers across the sky. For two strangely-silent minutes, while the moon completely covers the sun, you're spellbound inside the moon's cool shadow. Then, suddenly, reluctantly, you're free again--free for the rest of your life to jet around the world trying to catch another total eclipse.

Total eclipses are serious business. Partial eclipses, on the other hand, are just plain fun.

Get ready for fun. On Friday afternoon, April 8th, people in southern parts of the USA, all of Mexico and much of South America will experience a partial eclipse.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/images/solareclipse/koehn_northamerica_450.gif

Above: Eclipse circumstances across North America, April 8, 2005. Click on the image for a better view of the eclipse clock in the lower-left corner. Credit and copyright: Larry Koehn. [More]

The sky won't grow dark. Birds won't stop singing. And the corona won't make an appearance. During a partial eclipse of the sun, the moon covers only a fraction of the solar disk, taking a curved "bite" out of our star. The sun remains glaring-bright. If you don't know it's happening, you might not even notice.

But there is something to see: the shadows.

Look under a tree. Sunlight beaming through gaps in the leaves make crescent-shaped spots on the ground. Look around the walls of your home or office. You might see crescents projected by slits in the window shades. Windows with cut glass are even better. Their prism-sharp corners bend sunlight and cast rainbow-colored crescents in unexpected places. It's like a treasure hunt.

You can make your own crescents. Lay your left hand on top of your right hand, criss-crossing your fingers waffle-style; hold your hands so that sunlight can beam through the gaps. You'll see a pretty matrix of crescents on the ground. Have you ever made a turkey or a rabbit using hand-shadows? Try it during a partial eclipse; the animal's eye will be crescent-shaped.

Partial eclipses last for more than an hour, so there's plenty of time to play.

Below: Science@NASA readers captured these pictures of crescent-shaped sunbeams during a partial solar eclipse on June 10, 2002.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/images/solareclipse/crescent_strip.jpg

Meanwhile, in the middle of the South Pacific, a small number of people on cruise ships will be busy having their lives changed. The eclipse there will be total, with the moon briefly covering all of the sun. Unfortunately, the narrow path of totality does not touch land.

An almost-total eclipse can be seen not far from New Zealand (map), and in parts of Costa Rica, Panama, Columbia and Venezuela (map). In those places, the eclipse is annular. The moon is perfectly aligned with the sun, but does not completely cover it. A little bit of the sun pokes out all around, producing a "ring of fire." Think of the shadows!

Astronomy trivia: Eclipses that are total in some places and annular in others are called hybrid eclipses. The April 8th eclipse is one of these.

The partial phase of this eclipse happens in North America between about 5:30 and 7:00 p.m. EDT (timetables). For many people, this corresponds to sunset. Crescent sunsets are pretty, but be careful. Even when the sun is hanging low and dimmed by clouds, it is still dangerous to look at. A brief glimpse through a telescope or binoculars can blind you. Try projecting an image of the sun instead (instructions).

A partial eclipse. Totally fun.
 
src
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/TECH/space/04/01/extrasolar.planet.photo/story.extrasolar.planet.pho.jpg

Astronomers capture photo of extrasolar planet
'First directly imaged and confirmed companion to a sun-like star'

(SPACE.com) -- After a few close calls, astronomers have finally obtained the first photograph of a planet beyond our solar system, SPACE.com has learned.

The planet is thought to be one to two times as massive as Jupiter. It orbits a star similar to a young version of our sun.

The star, GQ Lupi, has been observed by a team of European astronomers since 1999. They have made three images using the Very Large Telescope (VLT) of the European Southern Observatory (ESO) in Chile.

The Hubble Space Telescope and the Japanese Subaru Telescope each contributed an image, too.

The work was led by Ralph Neuhaeuser of the Astrophysical Institute & University Observatory (AIU).

"The detection of the faint object near the bright star is certain," Neuhaeuser told SPACE.com on Friday.

The system is young, so the planet is rather warm, like a bun fresh out of the oven. That warmth made it comparatively easier to see in the glare of its host star compared with more mature planets. Also, the planet is very far from the star -- about 100 times the distance between Earth and the Sun, another factor in helping to separate the light between the two objects.

The discovery will be detailed in an upcoming issue of the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics. Neuhaeuser's co-authors include Ph.D. student Markus Mugrauer, who performed the observations, and Guenther Wuchterl.

"This is the first directly imaged and confirmed companion to a sun-like star, and as such marks the dawn of a new era in planet detection," said Ray Jayawardhana, a University of Toronto researcher who was not involved in the discovery but has seen the scientific paper.
Other recent milestones

Over the past decade, astronomers have found about 150 extrasolar planets. The vast majority have only been detected indirectly, by noting their stars' wobbles.

Earlier this month, astronomers announced the detection of a planet's infrared light using the Spitzer Space Telescope. But that observation did not involve a photograph. Instead, the system's total light was seen to drop when the planet was eclipsed by the star.

Late last year, another European team announced what might have been the first photograph of an extrasolar planet. That planet candidate has yet to be confirmed, however, because it's not yet clear whether it is orbiting the star or if it might be an object in the distant background. And even if it is a planet, it is an unusually large one -- several times the mass of Jupiter -- and it orbits a failed star known as a brown dwarf.

The object around GQ Lupi is clearly linked to the star gravitationally.

"The separation between star and planet has not changed from 1999 to 2004, which means that they move together on the sky," Neuhaeuser said. "In our case, we do have a normal plain image showing the bright star and the faint planet a little bit west of the star. The planet is only 156 times fainter than the star, because the planet is still very young and hence still forming, still contracting."

This object "appears to pass" the observational tests "for being a planetary mass companion to its parent star," Jayawardhana said.
Familiar yet different

The picture of GQ Lupi and its planet is exciting to astronomers because the system resembles in some respects our own solar system in its formation years.

The planet is about 3,140 degrees Fahrenheit (2000 Kelvin) -- not the sort of place that would be expected to support life. Neuhaeuser's team has also detected water in the planet's atmosphere. The world is expected to be gaseous, like Jupiter. It is about twice the diameter of Jupiter. The mass estimate -- one to two times that of Jupiter -- is "somewhat uncertain," Neuhaeuser said.

The planet is three times farther from GQ Lupi than Neptune is from our Sun. "We should expect that the planet orbits around the star, but at its large separation one orbital period [a year] is roughly 1,200 years, so that orbital motion is not yet detected."

It's not known why it is so far out.

"It is unlikely, but not impossible, that the planet formed at that large separation, because circumstellar disks around other stars often are that large or even larger," Neuhaeuser said.

Or perhaps the planet had a close brush with another developing world. The interaction could have thrown the newly discovered planet outward while tossing the other one, which has not been detected, in toward the star. It's also possible the newfound planet has a highly elliptical orbit and is currently near its outer bounds.

The star GQ Lupi is part of a star-forming region about 400 light-years away. At 70 percent the mass of the Sun, it is "quite similar to our Sun," Neuhaeuser said. But GQ Lupi is only about 1 million years old. The Sun is middle-aged, at 4.6 billion years old.
Quick formation

"What's most exciting about this discovery is that it raises a plethora of new questions regarding the origin of a planet so far out from its parent star," Jayawardhana, who is an expert on the disks around young stars from which planets form, said in a email interview.

Jayawardhana wonders whether it formed in a protoplanetary disk much closer in, roughly where Jupiter is in our solar system, and then get flung out. Or if it was born almost at the same time as its star, fragmenting out of a contracting protostellar cloud.

"One way or another, this object must have formed pretty quickly" given the star's age, he said.

Knots of gas and dust have been detected around other young stars in setups that astronomers believe are solar systems in the making. Theorists believe our solar system formed when the Sun's leftovers developed into a thin disk of orbiting material.

Rocky planets like Earth formed when chunks stuck together. Astronomers do not agree, however, how gas giants are born.

Alan Boss, a planet formation theorist at Carnegie Institution of Washington, called the image "really exciting." But he said there is "one little nagging doubt" in that the object's mass is only an estimate.

Weighing it precisely would involve noting the gravitational wobble the apparent planet induces on the star, but this object is too far from the star to produce a meaningful wobble. Yet even if the object is four times the mass of Jupiter it would still be considered a planet, Boss said in a telephone interview.

"I think there's a really good chance that this is an historic photo," Boss said.
 
AURORA WATCH: When the sun went down in Scotland last night, the skies lit up with auroras. "It was not a very strong display," says photographer Jim Henderson, "but it was the first we've seen since February." He took this picture at Crooktree, 25 miles west of Aberdeen:

http://www.spaceweather.com/aurora/images2005/04apr05/henderson1_strip.jpg

More auroras are possible tonight as a solar wind stream continues to buffet Earth's magnetic field. The best displays, if any, will be over Alaska, Canada and northern Europe.
 
INSIDE A RAINBOW: The next time you see a rainbow, look carefully at the colors. There's red on the outside, then orange, yellow, green and, finally, on the inside, blue.

That's how a rainbow stops, on blue. Except this rainbow, photographed March 28th by Vincent Jacques of Menton, France, kept going--blue, green, blue, green, blue, green:

http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2005/04apr05/Jacques1_strip.jpg

Atmospheric optics expert Les Cowley explains: "The extra bows just inside the primary rainbow are called supernumeraries. They were so named because 17th century theories of the rainbow could not explain them -- they were thought of as extras and not supposed to exist! Supernumeraries are produced by the interference between light waves and nowadays they tell us that the raindrops are small."
 
Back
Top