Asked If Biden WH Uncovered Any ‘Impropriety’ Re Trump/Russia, NSA Sullivan Says

[AlterErgo]

Asked If Biden WH Uncovered Any ‘Impropriety’ Re Trump/Russia, NSA Sullivan Says ‘I’ve Got Nothing’…


Maybe he should axe KEITH for the info

 

[AlterErgo]

Hey Keith, call NSA Sully

 

[BidudeinWi]

Asked If Biden WH Uncovered Any ‘Impropriety’ Re Trump/Russia, NSA Sullivan Says ‘I’ve Got Nothing’…


Maybe he should axe KEITH for the info

Cuz there was none! How many times do we have to go over this

 

[phrodeau]

October 2015, Trump signs a letter of intent for development of Trump Tower Moscow, with 250 condominiums.

October 2016, Trump says, “I know nothing about Russia. I know—I know about Russia, but I know nothing about the inner workings of Russia. I don’t deal there. I have no businesses there. I have no loans from Russia.”

 

[AlterErgo]

October 2015, Trump signs a letter of intent for development of Trump Tower Moscow, with 250 condominiums.

October 2016, Trump says, “I know nothing about Russia. I know—I know about Russia, but I know nothing about the inner workings of Russia. I don’t deal there. I have no businesses there. I have no loans from Russia.”

so

 

[ll74]

The intelligence report is pretty damn comprehensive. It spells out Russian involvement in our election as well as multiple interactions with the Trump campaign that occurred. It even delves into the dossier.

If you're pushing a narrative and can't find a quote within that multi-part report, you really should just stfu and read.

 

[LittleDixie]

October 2015, Trump signs a letter of intent for development of Trump Tower Moscow, with 250 condominiums.

October 2016, Trump says, “I know nothing about Russia. I know—I know about Russia, but I know nothing about the inner workings of Russia. I don’t deal there. I have no businesses there. I have no loans from Russia.”

OMG, did Mueller know about this, shocking revelation?!?!

...oh, yeah, he did.

 

[Cubantripod]

The intelligence report is pretty damn comprehensive. It spells out Russian involvement in our election as well as multiple interactions with the Trump campaign that occurred. It even delves into the dossier.

If you're pushing a narrative and can't find a quote within that multi-part report, you really should just stfu and read.

This isn't new. Russia has been meddling in our elections since Kennedy. The question was were they successful in changing any votes. No evidence has come out, even after a 2 year investigation by Mueller. Were there contacts? Yes. We know that and they were investigated and there was no evidence of any collusion with any Americans.

 

[ll74]

This isn't new. Russia has been meddling in our elections since Kennedy. The question was were they successful in changing any votes. No evidence has come out, even after a 2 year investigation by Mueller. Were there contacts? Yes. We know that and they were investigated and there was no evidence of any collusion with any Americans.

Information changes votes. If the information is bullshit propaganda, then that bullshit propaganda changed the vote. Not rocket science, though certainly not provable outside of theoretical.

There was evidence in the report of Trump campaign officials interacting with Russian operatives. I'd say there is evidence that some of these interactions were improper......to the level of criminality....probably not....but that political case to be made was a ship that sailed long ago.

The right uses the word "collusion" to mean that nothing improper was done. No one was charged with collusion, though collusion isn't a crime, so no one will ever be charged with collusion.

 

[HisArpy]

Information changes votes. If the information is bullshit propaganda, then that bullshit propaganda changed the vote. Not rocket science, though certainly not provable outside of theoretical.

There was evidence in the report of Trump campaign officials interacting with Russian operatives. I'd say there is evidence that some of these interactions were improper......to the level of criminality....probably not....but that political case to be made was a ship that sailed long ago.

The right uses the word "collusion" to mean that nothing improper was done. No one was charged with collusion, though collusion isn't a crime, so no one will ever be charged with collusion.

Tell us smart guy, how did that "information" which changed votes get disseminated?

Maybe the media which disseminated that "information" was the true toady of Putin. You ever consider that? Or did you just fail to consider anything not bottle fed to you by that self same media?

 

[ll74]

Tell us smart guy, how did that "information" which changed votes get disseminated?

Maybe the media which disseminated that "information" was the true toady of Putin. You ever consider that? Or did you just fail to consider anything not bottle fed to you by that self same media?

I was talking about the Senate Intelligence Report. It lists various ways that the information was disseminated.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/press/senate-intel-releases-volume-5-bipartisan-russia-report

Seems like you just want to find something to fight about.