Ask a MtF TG a question

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was an English major and I love Jane Austen. I have read every one of her novels several times over. What a mind she had with her powers of observation! Was going to the center worthwhile?
There was a talk going on behind a closed door... perhaps an embroidery class. The cakes sounded lovely but were too pricey for my pocket, so I simply had a little pot of tea, though it was not bone china 😦 Besides it was barely 11am and too early for cakes.

I was intrigued by the raised sidewalk you can see in front of the houses. The street is a whole level below, so I guess it was built that way. Fab architecture in a very hilly city.
https://64.media.tumblr.com/afc0ffe7093cf00dc5a7fb8ef339ff5e/0975b24f13bdb5ca-5d/s540x810/06e87d4566e6daadd17c63cfb5edeac87dbcffac.jpg
 
Wow...that looks beautiful. My daughter would love going there....she is a Jane Austen fanatic. Maybe next trip across the pond!!
 
Very interesting photo. Do you see the raised sidewalk like that anywhere else in England?
I can't think of any, which is why I took the photo - we were waiting in traffic. Bath is pretty unique, having mushroomed in a singular style.
It still had plenty poorer areas, and I recall Jane's family lived in a very damp area in Bath, something that contributed to her father's death.
 
Very interesting photo. Do you see the raised sidewalk like that anywhere else in England?
Our sidewalks are called pavements, which are raised. The curb is the raised part. Its not as deep/high as those in the US.
We have soft verges down country lanes and to the side of motorways. In London some of the pavements are high to stop vehicles mounting them, but they are rare.
 
Question: How does a MTF TG deal with hereditary stuff like male-pattern baldness?
Male-pattern baldness involves an interaction between genetic factors and androgens (testosterone etc.) Trans women who've undergone orchiectomy (removal of the testicles) or hormone treatments will usually have much lower levels of androgens, so they're unlikely to develop MPB.

This goes the other way too: trans men who get testosterone supplements often do develop MPB.
 
Male-pattern baldness involves an interaction between genetic factors and androgens (testosterone etc.) Trans women who've undergone orchiectomy (removal of the testicles) or hormone treatments will usually have much lower levels of androgens, so they're unlikely to develop MPB.

This goes the other way too: trans men who get testosterone supplements often do develop MPB.
Numerous MTFs had MPB before their transition. They wear wigs. Estrogen does not grow hair.

( . )( . )
 
I've always been keen in my thread to provide useful information for anyone wanting to advocate for trans rights. Ammunition if you will, to push back with truth against conspiracies.
JK Rowling is not my favourite person and tbh I kinda avoid articles with her named linked for my own mental health. That's why I love ZRosey's thread that it's not all bad news!! :)

I've read a little about Hirschfield, who was an early pioneer in providing rudimentary medical care to transgender folk in the 1930s in Germany. So when this article by a professor of history in Seattle popped up, it broadened my knowledge.
 
I've always been keen in my thread to provide useful information for anyone wanting to advocate for trans rights. Ammunition if you will, to push back with truth against conspiracies.
JK Rowling is not my favourite person and tbh I kinda avoid articles with her named linked for my own mental health. That's why I love ZRosey's thread that it's not all bad news!! :)

I've read a little about Hirschfield, who was an early pioneer in providing rudimentary medical care to transgender folk in the 1930s in Germany. So when this article by a professor of history in Seattle popped up, it broadened my knowledge.
Thanks for sharing Dr. Marhoefer's article! Pretty much shreds JKR's "evidence!"
 
Thank you for the pride magazine link. It's pretty sobering imagining the things that happened to trans and diverse folks back in that era....
If you get a chance, read up on Hirschfield, because it links into the film about The Danish Girl. There's a decent about of info online - Science Museum, Scientific American, and the Guardian
You can browse them as you watch the six foot of snow fall outside!! ;)
I'll come back and read those later, but I gotta dash for work x
 
A fairly long article linked here now that the long-running Cass report has been finalised. The main gender clinic in the UK was the Tavistock and was the one I attended all those years ago. There was hardly any waiting list back then, staff remembered who you were and the process felt safe and sympathetic.

In the years that followed, gender became a loaded word: initially as a cool thing for kids to question, then increasingly, drawing alarmist headlines about the apparent epidemic of transgender kids.
The numbers speak for themselves with patient lists at Tavistock mushrooming from 250 to 5000 referrals per year.

I haven't read the review, but this seems a fairly balanced report on it. I agree with much of its findings but I can understand how clinicians were overwhelmed by numbers and also under pressure from advocates who'd scream 'transphobia' if ever questions were raised about diagnoses or practises.

I have cousins who teach and they report that it is often parents who seek attention by over-reacting to their child's questions such as 'why don't boys wear dresses?' as being reason to run straight to a psychiatrist. The pushy-parent is well known phenomena in schools and not just limited to my cousins observations.
It's the same pushiness that sees parents avoiding normal vaccinations for their children so that the UK has outbreaks of measles that run rampant in schools "... but we heard summinck on the internet that said vaccinations makes your kid autistic..."

My memory doesn't go back to know if the same hysteria circled the gay community: that gay men were all pedos, that homosexuality could be beaten out of a child or that being gay was infectious. Maybe that pendulum swung wildly before common sense prevailed?
 
…..

My memory doesn't go back to know if the same hysteria circled the gay community: that gay men were all pedos, that homosexuality could be beaten out of a child or that being gay was infectious. Maybe that pendulum swung wildly before common sense prevailed?

Things have been changing over the years here in California. Two teachers were fired when they were outed for being gay at my middle school back in the 80’s. I remember hearing parents saying what a good thing it was that someone had hired a private investigator to confirm the rumors. We lost a dedicated art teacher and a favorite substitute.

Some of my kids who are now young adults had a nonbinary XY principal at their high school.

Things have been getting better, even in the Catholic Church my parents went to. Twenty years ago a group of men in their congregation were not only excommunicated but also told they were not welcome on church property by a priest who was ‘celibate gay’. Now although they are not allowed to receive the sacrament, homosexual people are allowed to attend. I’ve been told the new rules were implemented by Pope Francis, though I wonder if the change was also made in consideration of falling attendance. The movement has been glacial and transgenderism is still unsupported, but progress is slowly being made.

🤷‍♀️
 
Things have been changing over the years here in California. Two teachers were fired when they were outed for being gay at my middle school back in the 80’s. I remember hearing parents saying what a good thing it was that someone had hired a private investigator to confirm the rumors. We lost a dedicated art teacher and a favorite substitute.

Some of my kids who are now young adults had a nonbinary XY principal at their high school.

Things have been getting better, even in the Catholic Church my parents went to. Twenty years ago a group of men in their congregation were not only excommunicated but also told they were not welcome on church property by a priest who was ‘celibate gay’. Now although they are not allowed to receive the sacrament, homosexual people are allowed to attend. I’ve been told the new rules were implemented by Pope Francis, though I wonder if the change was also made in consideration of falling attendance. The movement has been glacial and transgenderism is still unsupported, but progress is slowly being made.

🤷‍♀️
I agree there's been progress but it also depends on WHERE you live. Some of the more conservative areas of the country (like the upper Midwest where I live) are still pretty homophobic and transphobic. Right wing nut job politicians are fueling their fears, just the same as Hitler did in the 30's. There are pockets of acceptance...bigger cities, university towns, presence of multinational corporations, etc.

Used to attend Catholic church regularly but the pastor of our parish is ultra-conservative. Anti gay, anti trans, anti vaccine, feels that "Christianity is under attack."
 
A fairly long article linked here now that the long-running Cass report has been finalised.
I haven't read the review, but this seems a fairly balanced report on it. I agree with much of its findings but
The astonishing thing is how blatantly biased its methodology was from the start. It was like getting a bunch of old white men together (without any women in the room) to discuss whether feminism was a good thing, and to dismiss any scientific research that might suggest otherwise, inevitably coming to the decision that women under 25 aren't mature enough to make serious decisions.

I hate bad science. The Cass review was set up as a blunt political instrument. It has already done damage at the interim stage, and is now doing worse. (The sense that her own intentions were perhaps good just grates.) Bad enough that the Tories started it, but now the opposition party (and likely next government) has embraced its findings too.
 
I hate bad science. The Cass review was set up as a blunt political instrument. It has already done damage at the interim stage, and is now doing worse
I wish I could think of a reasonable and rational reply here. The more I read snippets of the Cass report, the more discouraged I feel. The misinformation and outright lies seem to have replaced solid science these days....

Closer to home for me, I just testified for the third time regarding trans participation in school sports. Even tho comments are overwhelmingly in favor of all kids in sports these worthless politicians keep introducing bills to stop queer kids participating.

I wish these old white guys would just die off....
 
The astonishing thing is how blatantly biased its methodology was from the start. It was like getting a bunch of old white men together (without any women in the room) to discuss whether feminism was a good thing, and to dismiss any scientific research that might suggest otherwise, inevitably coming to the decision that women under 25 aren't mature enough to make serious decisions.

I hate bad science. The Cass review was set up as a blunt political instrument. It has already done damage at the interim stage, and is now doing worse. (The sense that her own intentions were perhaps good just grates.) Bad enough that the Tories started it, but now the opposition party (and likely next government) has embraced its findings too.
I hate bad science too. One aspect of that was Cass taking four years to report what we all knew - that Tavistock, had become dysfunctional.

Cass recommended that regional hubs should replace Tavistock, but while most have put a sign at the window, the centres are underfunded and virtually unstaffed. The government has not provided adequate funding and action to create regional hubs to clear the four year backlog the delay has caused.

Stonewall commented
“Many recommendations could make a positive impact – such an expanding provision of healthcare by moving away from a single national service towards a series of regional centres, while recognising that there are many different treatment pathways that trans young people might take.”

Even Mermaids welcome that Cass' report "recognises the current system is failing trans youth".

Another recommendation in the report is the children be assessed to “inform an individualised care plan” including screenings for “neurodevelopmental conditions” such as autism, depression, anxiety, and others.” I agree and find it disappointing the service had a blinkered view in the past.

So I get it that Cass has been cast as the evil expert, but she was handed a shit sandwich. While elements of the media, politicians and even fiction authors are wildly anti-trans, it’s kids who suffer, with still no real services for them. Maybe I’m wrong about Cass herself and I’ll always look at other povs to learn or challenge my opinion. The problem with any scientific study is that politicians cherry pick the bits they want to hear. The report lists numerous possible causes for dysphoria but one politician jumped on child sex abuse as a reason for preclude trans from legislation to ban conversion therapy. The report included the opinion of one clinician who doubted the existence of gender dysphoria and that too was leapt on as 'proof' instead of being seen as part of body of evidence that acknowledged conflicting views in how to provide care.

Maybe if politics in the UK was less populist and able to take a balance approach instead of appeasing the like of JKR or the LGB Alliance, then the report would be seen in a better light - as being honest, if sometimes brutal in its findings. Germany has just removed its onerous requirement to change legal gender and several other European countries have a more intelligent and thoughtful attitude toward trans issues. I wouldn't be surprised if the UK decides to challenge abortion rights, given the way it acts as America's poodle.

ETA
Here's a link to download the full 380-page report. I'm only skimming through it.
 
Last edited:
The more I learn about Cass & co., the more sinister it all seems. I was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt four years ago, but her allies, collaborators, methodology, conclusions and consequences are all too neat. Ultimately her report says nothing new, and will do a lot of damage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top