Asian Female Sex Squeeling?????

That's my point, and you were very clear. Glad you admit that it was you who brought it up.
 
Sparky Kronkite said:
It's how "you" perceive it - how the words, what the words mean to you - in your mind - that's what matters. To you! It's your meaning, your interpretation - that matters. It's your self-centered ideals that matter. It's "you" that matters. It's "all you" - it's not about Asians, or Eskimos or Blacks at all.

It's all about you.

And your inate bigotry. A bigotry that we all have.

As I said, I already know your theory about how being insulted is in the eye of the insulted, and it's not your fault they can't take a joke.
 
I ask all of you - look at things from different sides....

Approach an ideal or idea from the rear. Approach it from above, bellow and all sides.

Don't only see the glass half-full, see the glass half-empty and see it completely empty. Hell, see the glass - shattered in the sink - bloodied hands above - red draining away - life forever gone.

Think as to why people have morals, ideals, beliefs etc.. Why?

Most would say - because it's something of value to live by - to look toward - to be guided by. A good thing.

But I say morals, ideals and beliefs etc., are so much more than that. Much more than being a "simple good thing."

A line in the sand is not just something to be crossed or not crossed, a place over which one should not go - a line in the sand is personal protection, a barrier - holding back ideals, morals and beliefs - that the drawer of which - "does not want to be exposed to."

All morals, beliefs and ideals are in essence - life rules - rules necessary for individuals to protect themselves - rules which provide walls - rules which provide segregation - rules which fuel prejudice. And to rules which walk hand in hand with ignorance.

I try to hover above all such rules and walls. I try to look at them from all different view points. I mostly fail - but I try none the less.

And - I do try to point out these different view points to others, others who so desperately need and value the relative safety of their own walls. Their own rules - rules of their own making. Safety, guidance, prejudice, bigotry - all of their own creation.

Even when most are too blinded - by looking at morals, beliefs and rules - from only one position - their very own self-centered postion.
 
Re: I ask all of you - look at things from different sides....

Sparky Kronkite said:

All morals, beliefs and ideals are in essence - life rules - rules necessary for individuals to protect themselves - rules which provide walls - rules which provide segregation - rules which fuel prejudice. And to rules which walk hand in hand with ignorance.

I try to hover above all such rules and walls. I try to look at them from all different view points. I mostly fail - but I try none the less.

Morals, beliefs and ideals also result in rules which provide structure for society and prevent anarchy. Rules which if not followed, or are "hovered above", result in your ass being thrown in prison. Yes, rules are necessary to protect people from other people who have poor morals, ethics, and ideals.
 
Even more than that, can you imagine living in a society that valued lying over the truth, or breaking promises over keeping them?

Wait didn't they just leave office?
 
um Sparky?

how do you know what a rodent sounds like when it fucks?



your not into anything .... um......Kinky....











...are ya?
 
Anarchy is just a word.....

A word that has been wrongly, and only "negatively construed" by ill-thinking moralist over quite some time now.

Anarchy is not "only" a negative term - yes it can mean disorder (but is that really negative?) it can mean "without political authority (but is that really negative?) - again - some folks will continue to see only one view of something.

The blinders are on! Those dumb-founding fucking blinders.

Anarchy can mean - from a positive perspective - tranquil peace - where no "system, rules, political authority, or morals, etc.," are necessary. Sure anarchy(?) - it could be disorderly - but so what? Everything is disorderly anyway. Take a look around.

Anyway - "you" make your own order or disorder. "Other's" make their own order or disorder. Order is all relative - meaningful only to the individual who assesses it.

In a positive form of anarchy - as long as everybody's "good" - everybody's good.

Now of course I know you all will be going - what? Sparky you live in a dream world!!!!!!..... Maybe. But it's more practical than that - it all has to do with "evolutionary, positive thinking." Thinking ahead of your time. (It's really not so hard to do but most folks have a problem with it - too busy - too self-centered.)

You see - things happen slowly. No duh Spark! Things change slowly. The advocates of change are always in the minority at first. As am I. But without those who first stand up and say - "we need a change," - then, the evolution of change never (slowly) takes place. I never begins.

I always will, I always do - advocate positive change. And conversely - I advocate disdain for stagnant, obsolete ideals. And the ideal/idea that, we as a society will "forever need" and require rules, morals, systems etc.. is sheer ludicrously to me. It's small thinking. It's negative thinking. It's defeatist. Your done, your cooked - hell - march into the oven and breath deep.

Sure rules may be necessary today, rules are necessary today - (hey people are stupid today) - but surely most folks can't remain so negative as to think mankind "will forever" need such small and insignificant wastes of energy as rules and morals. Surely, if you are a positive person (yeah you may say you are, you may pretend to be, but are you really?) and have a brain "you must know" that mankind will one day rise above such petty bullshit. Can't everyone see the huge amounts of bullshit that currently surround us all? You wanna stay here and wallow in it? Or to you wanna dig yourself out in a positive way?

Sure - I'm in the minority - so what? If as a thinking person you at least don't give this some positive thought - I feel that you are lost to the negativity of the moment. You are not "thinking ahead" toward positive improved quality of life for all mankind. And it's likely that you are a self-centered, now person, who only cares about the quality of your life now - and not, your grandchildren's grandchildren.

In my mind I hope we breed out these negative individuals as soon as possible. I think the quality of life sucks today and rather than build walls to self centeredly protect myself - I will think forward for a positive enlightened growth through change for mankind. I want my grandchildren or their children, and their children, etc., - to have a much improved life from what we have now.

And it all starts with me (and the few who think like me) - right now.

Fuck the rest of you dumbasses.

Take it or leave it - Uber Spark has spoken.
 
Re: Anarchy is just a word.....

Sparky Kronkite said:
A word that has been wrongly, and only "negatively construed" by ill-thinking moralist over quite some time now.

Anarchy is not "only" a negative term - yes it can mean disorder (but is that really negative?) it can mean "without political authority (but is that really negative?) - again - some folks will continue to see only one view of something.


Sparky the problem is that both of these definitions are negitive, and I don't know any way that 'anarchy' can be defined positively.

The blinders are on! Those dumb-founding fucking blinders.

Anarchy can mean - from a positive perspective - tranquil peace - where no "system, rules, political authority, or morals, etc.," are necessary. Sure anarchy(?) - it could be disorderly - but so what? Everything is disorderly anyway. Take a look around.


I think a better concept and term would be that of 'shalom' a hebrew word usally translated as 'peace'. The concept is not the 'end of hostilities' that we usally attach to the engalish word, but rather more like 'domestic tranquility'. In other words the lively give and take that you have in your home, or for that mater, here on the board, when it is functioning as it should (the debate of this thread is a good example). There is order in that we disapline ourselves to discourse with each other, but that discussion takes lots of crazy turns, after all this started out talking about the noises that Asian weomaen may or may bnot make during orgasim! Not very organized, but we got here in an orderly fashion.

Anyway - "you" make your own order or disorder. "Other's" make their own order or disorder. Order is all relative - meaningful only to the individual who assesses it.

Nope, an independent observer can distingish order from disorder.

In a positive form of anarchy - as long as everybody's "good" - everybody's good.

Now of course I know you all will be going - what? Sparky you live in a dream world!!!!!!..... Maybe. But it's more practical than that - it all has to do with "evolutionary, positive thinking." Thinking ahead of your time. (It's really not so hard to do but most folks have a problem with it - too busy - too self-centered.)

You see - things happen slowly. No duh Spark! Things change slowly. The advocates of change are always in the minority at first. As am I. But without those who first stand up and say - "we need a change," - then, the evolution of change never (slowly) takes place. I never begins.

I always will, I always do - advocate positive change. And conversely - I advocate disdain for stagnant, obsolete ideals. And the ideal/idea that, we as a society will "forever need" and require rules, morals, systems etc.. is sheer ludicrously to me. It's small thinking. It's negative thinking. It's defeatist. Your done, your cooked - hell - march into the oven and breath deep.

Sure rules may be necessary today, rules are necessary today - (hey people are stupid today) - but surely most folks can't remain so negative as to think mankind "will forever" need such small and insignificant wastes of energy as rules and morals. Surely, if you are a positive person (yeah you may say you are, you may pretend to be, but are you really?) and have a brain "you must know" that mankind will one day rise above such petty bullshit. Can't everyone see the huge amounts of bullshit that currently surround us all? You wanna stay here and wallow in it? Or to you wanna dig yourself out in a positive way?


Voltair made the same argument a couple of centuries ago, and we have not realy progresed in the moral way that you are talking about. If it s going to happen it is a long way off.

Sure - I'm in the minority - so what? If as a thinking person you at least don't give this some positive thought - I feel that you are lost to the negativity of the moment. You are not "thinking ahead" toward positive improved quality of life for all mankind. And it's likely that you are a self-centered, now person, who only cares about the quality of your life now - and not, your grandchildren's grandchildren.

In my mind I hope we breed out these negative individuals as soon as possible. I think the quality of life sucks today and rather than build walls to self centeredly protect myself - I will think forward for a positive enlightened growth through change for mankind. I want my grandchildren or their children, and their children, etc., - to have a much improved life from what we have now.

And it all starts with me (and the few who think like me) - right now.

Fuck the rest of you dumbasses.

Take it or leave it - Uber Spark has spoken.

Sorry man, I just don't think that it is going to work that way. So I guess I have to leave it.
 
Nope. I actuallity disorder does not exist.

Fractal science proves it - everything has order.

And if you insist - what some would term disorder - can be very beautiful - it can be art - it can be positive.

Thus - not negative at all.
 
Back
Top