HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 43,760
Donald Trump was convicted of fraud in a court of law. Elon Musk has no proof of his claims of SS fraud.
Said conviction is on appeal and it ain't over until it's over. Most legal scholars agree that the conviction will be overturned. At which point you will still claim he was convicted and then conveniently omit the reversal by the appellate courts so that it looks like you're telling the truth.
Meanwhile, it's in the early stages of the DOGE referrals. Which look like proof of fraud to me because it's linked to the data. Said data to be used in a court of law against those so referred and used by a jury in their deliberations. If the deliberations are done based on the data, then the convictions are impending. Which, again, looks like proof of fraud to me.
YMMV because it's (D)ifferent when you do it. Right?