As the DOGE turns.

Because if you were happy about the election, you wouldn't be complaining about it.

Pretty simple.
Are you suggesting that the only reason you're not complaining is that your side won?

Neat admission.

Then he's not one, calling an elected president an autocrat for cleaning up his own branch of government is Histiron Bitch: Level 9. Don't worry you go full 11 with the "FASCISM REEEE" histrionics later.
You're just throwing shit at the fan. Musk has access and power that the EO (and previous EO on the work) doesn't cover.

You can excuse that as you need to.

What actions are the issue exactly?
Removing access of government employees without authorization is one. Accessing confidential and personal information without the required access is another. There are others.

No, it would be authoritarian.
Of course.


Fascism and authoritarianism are not the same thing, you've conflated the two multiple times now like almost every democrat does.
I never said they were.

They don't have to be specific for every single person and every single action taken. The government would be totally non-functional if it did that.
Of course. The person can assume powers they haven't been given.... obviously you're correct 👍
CIC says do X.....if X is legal, you do everything you legally can to accomplish that order. You don't have to call POTUS for every shit break and snack attack you take along the way.
Of course

Cops, military, everyone who ever worked directly for the executive branch of government knows this.
Lol
 
Governments everywhere are long overdue for enhanced data systems reviews with a view to increasing responsiveness and reducing waste and duplication of services.

Governments often get ripped off by IT service providers, so more internal intelligence and smarter politicians would help.

What’s happening in the USA is the sum of all of that, topped with people who don’t respect rules and process as being core to good government.

A polarized mess. Hope it doesnt destroy what little is left of what the USA should be.
 
Removing access of government employees without authorization is one.

Authorization from who???

Who is the ULTIMATE KING SHIT GOD EMPEROR of authorization inside the executive branch?? :D(y)(y)

Hint:
https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:456:240/g:fp:0.52:0.38/1*q5zk6W9aWoW7LJdSEEWt5Q.jpeg

Of course. The person can assume powers they haven't been given.... obviously you're correct 👍

They are given the powers when they are given the lawful order. They don't need to ask explicit authority for every shit break and phone call along the way.

When some SWAT sniper gets the order, he pulls the trigger he doesn't ask his fucking commander for an authorization letter from POTUS and every part of his chain of command ....the authority is assumed.

This isn't hard....18 year old E1 Marines with a room temp IQ and dumb fuck PIGs alike understand this....why are you having such trouble??
 
Last edited:
Governments everywhere are long overdue for enhanced data systems reviews with a view to increasing responsiveness and reducing waste and duplication of services.

And it's amazing how much kicking and screaming cries of "FASCIST!!!! REEEEEEEE!!!" pretty much all those super PROGRESSIVE governments are to exactly that kind of suggestion.

Makes you wonder why reducing waste and duplication of services has them so fucking triggered.......
 
I'm waiting for Herr Elon to audit the Pentagon.

The REEEEEE!!!'s and teeth gnashing of the Cheneycrats and Military industrial GHOULS will be delicious.

If DOGE manages to clean that cesspit up even marginally it will be one of the greatest victories of the people over their corrupt AF government since 28SEP1781.
 
Authorization from who???
Lol

Who is the ULTIMATE KING SHIT GOD EMPEROR of authorization inside the executive branch??

Hint:
Actually, there are laws in place that prevent firings of IG without involving Congress. Just one aspect.

They are given the powers when they are given the lawful order. They don't need to ask explicit authority for every shit break and phone call along the way.
Of course.
King.

When some SWAT sniper gets the order, he pulls the trigger he doesn't ask his fucking commander for an authorization letter from POTUS and every part of his chain of command ....the authority is assumed.
Lol
If Biden had done this,.you'd be losing your shit.
Don't pretend this is about the actual Constitution.

This isn't hard....18 year old E1 Marines with a room temp IQ and dumb fuck PIGs alike understand this....why are you having such trouble??

Musk doesn't have the power or authority to do what he is doing.
But keep barking about that. 👍
 
Last edited:
Actually, there are laws in place that prevent firings of IG without involving Congress. Just one aspect.

Ok well then impeach him.
Lol
If Biden had done this,.you'd be losing your shit.

If Biden had done this I'd be voting for him.

Don't pretend this is about the actual Constitution.
I'm not, YOU are.

Musk doesn't have the power or authority to do what he is doing.
But keep barking about that. 👍
Yes he does, POTUS gave him that authority.

That's why he's doing it.
 
Fake libertarians suddenly say authoritarianism is great! 😆 Fake libertarian incels are comedy gold.
 
If the courts refuse to do their job, then that is the next step


How'd that work out last time??? LOL

The courts will read that he was just fine firing them, but he can't replace them, congress has to do that.

Which means MAGA IG's.....SO MUCH WINNING!!! :D (y) (y)

Facts are funny!!

Of course 👍

Who is a higher authority in the Executive branch than POTUS??
 
He is violating the law.

No, he's not. He's violating your FEE FEES....not the same.

The courts will rule on that.

Yea, and anyone who actually read the law is going to laugh at democrats when they take ANOTHER huge L trying to demonize Trump as LIKE LITERALLY HITLAH!!! LOL
Laws exist.

Yes. I never said they didn't.

Article 1.

I asked you about the executive branch.... not the legislative.

Who is a higher authority than POTUS inside the executive branch?? Deflect deflect deflect....because facts got you by the fee fees.
 
No, he's not.
Notification of Congress for reorganization or certain firings is required by law.
My feelings don't factor in.
Yours apparently do.


Yea, and anyone who actually read the law is going to laugh at democrats when they take ANOTHER huge L trying to demonize Trump as LIKE LITERALLY HITLAH!!! LOL
Actions taken outside of the law certainly deserves comparisons of others who act outside of the law .

Yes. I never said they didn't.
Lol

I asked you about the executive branch.... not the legislative.
Yes, because you're focused on the executive branch and authorities within it.

That isn't my issue. Overreach is not limited to one branch of government.

 
Business as usual around here, I see!

Can you tell I'm fishing for a gratuitous insult to get my own Wednesday Rage up and running today?

... Because we're all agreed it's Wednesday today, right? (apart from Oz and other places over in the east). At least that? ... Right? Chad? ...
 
Notification of Congress for reorganization or certain firings is required by law.

Yes. IG's are not one of them.

He can fire them, but congress has to hire them.

Actions taken outside of the law certainly deserves comparisons of others who act outside of the law .

Yea, but he's not taking actions outside the law.

You're just in your "orang man bad" fee fees.

Yes, because you're focused on the executive branch and authorities within it.

Because that's what you and the comrades are crying about.

That isn't my issue. Overreach is not limited to one branch of government.
Never said it was.

But you weren't crying about Congress or SCOTUS overreaching were you??

So it is your issue....youz mad POTUS is POTUS.... you mad you lost the election and Orange man is doing things you don't like. :D (y)
 
Business as usual around here, I see!

Can you tell I'm fishing for a gratuitous insult to get my own Wednesday Rage up and running today?

... Because we're all agreed it's Wednesday today, right? (apart from Oz and other places over in the east). At least that? ... Right? Chad? ...

Seems like you're simping up to me a bit.

What kinda weak sauce run are you doing??
 
You keep saying that. You obviously don't have a clue how the government works. Quit parroting the morons that spent the past 4 years telling us that "Ole Joe's sharp as a tack."
I do. The stripping of accesss is unconstitutional. The access for his staff to information they have is illegal. The reorganization without Congressional notice is against the law.

Lots of shit done here that could have easily been done with the proper notifications....instead, they jumped the gun and now will be handling this in the courts.

Your deflection to 46 is your issue.
 
No, he's not. He's violating your FEE FEES....not the same.



Yea, and anyone who actually read the law is going to laugh at democrats when they take ANOTHER huge L trying to demonize Trump as LIKE LITERALLY HITLAH!!! LOL


Yes. I never said they didn't.



I asked you about the executive branch.... not the legislative.

Who is a higher authority than POTUS inside the executive branch?? Deflect deflect deflect....because facts got you by the fee fees.
28 USC 541 give him the authority to fire US attorneys. IGs can be removed by presidential authority. Just sent a memo to congress, be transparent about it. Since pubs have both houses now's the time to do it.
 
Laundry soap sales should go up.


Those losers should invest in dark trousers which won't show shitstains quite as markedly.


And out libturds are writhing in hate, which may be the best benefit of all, at least here.


Their helpless shrieks in the morning sound like Victory . . . .

I hear that there's a company what sells full body deodorant that can be used everywhere, even "down there."

I expect sales of such product to increase because dark pants can only cover so much.
 
Back
Top