Article: Bad writing to make you feel good

G

Guest

Guest
This made me feel really good about my writing (my emphases). - Perdita

What Corporate America Can't Build: a Sentence - SAM DILLON, NY Times, Dec. 7, 2004

BLOOMINGTON, Ill. - R. Craig Hogan, a former university professor who heads an online school for business writing here, received an anguished e-mail message recently from a prospective student. "i need help," said the message, which was devoid of punctuation. "i am writing a essay on writing i work for this company and my boss want me to help improve the workers writing skills can yall help me with some information thank you".

Hundreds of inquiries from managers and executives seeking to improve their own or their workers' writing pop into Dr. Hogan's computer in-basket each month, he says, describing a number that has surged as e-mail has replaced the phone for much workplace communication. Millions of employees must write more frequently on the job than previously. And many are making a hash of it. "E-mail is a party to which English teachers have not been invited," Dr. Hogan said. "It has companies tearing their hair out."

A recent survey of 120 American corporations reached a similar conclusion. The study, by the National Commission on Writing, a panel established by the College Board, concluded that a third of employees in the nation's blue-chip companies wrote poorly and that businesses were spending as much as $3.1 billion annually on remedial training. The problem shows up not only in e-mail but also in reports and other texts, the commission said. "It's not that companies want to hire Tolstoy," said Susan Traiman, a director at the Business Roundtable, an association of leading chief executives whose corporations were surveyed in the study. "But they need people who can write clearly, and many employees and applicants fall short of that standard."

Millions of inscrutable e-mail messages are clogging corporate computers by setting off requests for clarification, and many of the requests, in turn, are also chaotically written, resulting in whole cycles of confusion. Here is one from a systems analyst to her supervisor at a high-tech corporation based in Palo Alto, Calif.: "I updated the Status report for the four discrepancies Lennie forward us via e-mail (they in Barry file).. to make sure my logic was correct It seems we provide Murray with incorrect information ... However after verifying controls on JBL - JBL has the indicator as B ???? - I wanted to make sure with the recent changes - I processed today - before Murray make the changes again on the mainframe to 'C'."

The incoherence of that message persuaded the analyst's employers that she needed remedial training. "The more electronic and global we get, the less important the spoken word has become, and in e-mail clarity is critical," said Sean Phillips, recruitment director at another Silicon Valley corporation, Applera, a supplier of equipment for life science research, where most employees have advanced degrees. "Considering how highly educated our people are, many can't write clearly in their day-to-day work."
...
An entire educational industry has developed to offer remedial writing instruction to adults, with hundreds of public and private universities, for-profit schools and freelance teachers offering evening classes as well as workshops, video and online courses in business and technical writing. Kathy Keenan, a onetime legal proofreader who teaches business writing at the University of California Extension, Santa Cruz, said she sought to dissuade students from sending business messages in the crude shorthand they learned to tap out on their pagers as teenagers. "hI KATHY i am sending u the assignmnet again," one student wrote to her recently. "i had sent you the assignment earlier but i didnt get a respond. If u get this assgnment could u please respond . thanking u for ur cooperation." Most of her students are midcareer professionals in high-tech industries, Ms. Keenan said.
...
Even C.E.O.'s need writing help, said Roger S. Peterson, a freelance writer in Rocklin, Calif., who frequently coaches executives. "Many of these guys write in inflated language that desperately needs a laxative," Mr. Peterson said, and not a few are defensive. "They're in denial, and who's going to argue with the boss?"

But some realize their shortcomings and pay Mr. Peterson to help them improve. Don Morrison, a onetime auditor at Deloitte & Touche who has built a successful consulting business, is among them. "I was too wordy," Mr. Morrison said. "I liked long, convoluted passages rather than simple four-word sentences. And I had a predilection for underlining words and throwing in multiple exclamation points. Finally Roger threatened to rip the exclamation key off my keyboard."

Exclamation points were an issue when Linda Landis Andrews, who teaches at the University of Illinois at Chicago, led a workshop in May for midcareer executives at an automotive corporation based in the Midwest. Their exasperated supervisor had insisted that the men improve their writing. "I get a memo from them and cannot figure out what they're trying to say," the supervisor wrote Ms. Andrews.

When at her request the executives produced letters they had written to a supplier who had failed to deliver parts on time, she was horrified to see that tone-deaf writing had turned a minor business snarl into a corporate confrontation moving toward litigation. "They had allowed a hostile tone to creep into the letters," she said. "They didn't seem to understand that those letters were just toxic. "People think that throwing multiple exclamation points into a business letter will make their point forcefully," Ms. Andrews said. "I tell them they're allowed two exclamation points in their whole life."
...
Dr. Hogan, who founded his online Business Writing Center a decade ago after years of teaching composition at Illinois State University here, says that the use of multiple exclamation points and other nonstandard punctuation like the :) symbol, are fine for personal e-mail but that companies have erred by allowing experimental writing devices to flood into business writing. He scrolled through his computer, calling up examples of incoherent correspondence sent to him by prospective students.

"E-mails - that are received from Jim and I are not either getting open or not being responded to," the purchasing manager at a construction company in Virginia wrote in one memorandum that Dr. Hogan called to his screen. "I wanted to let everyone know that when Jim and I are sending out e-mails (example- who is to be picking up parcels) I am wanting for who ever the e-mail goes to to respond back to the e-mail. Its important that Jim and I knows that the person, intended, had read the e-mail. This gives an acknowledgment that the task is being completed. I am asking for a simple little 2 sec. Note that says "ok", "I got it", or Alright."

The construction company's human resources director forwarded the memorandum to Dr. Hogan while enrolling the purchasing manager in a writing course. "E-mail has just erupted like a weed, and instead of considering what to say when they write, people now just let thoughts drool out onto the screen," Dr. Hogan said. "It has companies at their wits' end."
 
Perdita:
I used to work as a computer consultant. Some of my clients were Fortune 500 companies. I have seen e-mails from supervisors that were even worse than the examples.

However, the key to the entire article is in the following sentence. "Considering how highly educated our people are, many can't write clearly in their day-to-day work."

Yet corporate America continues to pay for an 'educational' system that turns out unacceptable graduates. These are the same corporations who will slit throats to save pennies, yet they (indirectly) spend tens of thousands to educate people who cannot do the jobs for which they are hired. Go figure!
 
RR: Just imagine if employers gave writing tests in the hiring process. I daresay the system would break down. P.
 
I think a lot of the blame for incoherent writing can be placed at the feet of do your own thangism — different strokes/folks!!

You could always raise your mark from X to X+ by arguing that you were experimenting at finding your own unique voice in your composition.

Granted, there is always room for different methods of communicating, but you should only be allowed to experiment on those after you have proven you have an adequate grasp of the basics.

In school where all that mattered was the Mark, I did not see the danger. I only wished that I had the chutspah to pull off some of the BS that I saw being enacted, which did work.

Sometime after I had left home, I wanted to write an explanatory letter to my mother. I tried for months. Either it came out mad, or accusatory, or was totally incomprehensible.

I eventually took a Creative Writing course. (Because I was too chicken to face the stigma of signing up for a remedial course.) It helped. I did eventually get my letter written. And in the meantime, suffered a relapse of infectious writing disease.

The funny thing is that I remember writing stories (just for myself) back before high school. I can only hope that none of that writing survived.

((( SHUDDER )))
 
Last edited:
Thank you for posting that, 'Dita. The atrocities commited via e-mail are among my biggest pet peeves at work, especially when they're in mass mailings sent out by management high up enough to have figured out how to use a spell-check by now if nothing else.
 
R. Richard said:
Perdita:
I used to work as a computer consultant. Some of my clients were Fortune 500 companies. I have seen e-mails from supervisors that were even worse than the examples.

However, the key to the entire article is in the following sentence. "Considering how highly educated our people are, many can't write clearly in their day-to-day work."

Yet corporate America continues to pay for an 'educational' system that turns out unacceptable graduates. These are the same corporations who will slit throats to save pennies, yet they (indirectly) spend tens of thousands to educate people who cannot do the jobs for which they are hired. Go figure!

Let me suggest another element as well. Teaching students compositon skills in a composition classroom is a very useful thing. If, however, they complete their composition as freshmen and are never made accountable - i.e., graded or given a performance evaluation - on their writing skills again, then what motivation do they have to do the hard work required to hone and apply it? If I wanted good writers, I would make it clear from the outset that there were standards for email correspondence and that written communication would be checked and measured against those standards.

Shanglan
 
Though I know there are too many poor writers in this country that needs a thorough overhaul of its educational system, I do think part of the problem is that too many people still view email as 'casual'. That is, they put less effort into business (or even personal) correspondence online than if it were being printed in black and white on company letterhead to be signed in ink.

Even here on this forum I take care with my writing but too many do not. Perhaps they think it of no importance to spell check or hit the shift key for uppercase, but I feel it behooves me, and shows respect for others, to 'speak' well, even in cyberspace.

Perdita
 
I'm always proud of the fact that I can make a good impression with my covering letters whenever I apply for jobs. I know that 60% of applicants won't know the difference between Dear Sir/Yours faithfully and Dear Mr Smith/Yours sincerely, and that might give me an edge.

Then I stop and think, "Hang on, what if the employer doesn't know the difference between Dear Sir/Yours faithfully and Dear Mr Smith/Yours sincerely?" Worrying.

The Earl
 
I can't say I find this surprising.

I recall that many polls have determined that about half of the U.S. population is functionally illiterate.

I would blame the educational system, but I can't. It's just a tool and a tool can only do what we ask it.

And what's asked of the educational system is not that it turn out well educated human beings suitable for living in a democracy, but expert human resources suitable for perpetuating an economy.

So it's a classic case of "sometimes you get what you wish for, but it's not what you want." The people in charge wished for good employees. They should learn to live with the live with the limitations of that concept.

I'm in a very cynical mood today.:)
 
perdita said:
RR: Just imagine if employers gave writing tests in the hiring process. I daresay the system would break down. P.

Perdita:
You have underestimated the problem. Someone in charge would have to grade the tests. In many of the companies I worked for, that was beyond the capability of those in charge.

Yes, the system would break down, but from the top.

JMHO.
 
perdita said:


Even here on this forum I take care with my writing but too many do not. Perhaps they think it of no importance to spell check or hit the shift key for uppercase, but I feel it behooves me, and shows respect for others, to 'speak' well, even in cyberspace.

Perdita

And may God bless you for that.
 
Back
Top