Ariz. audit underway, officials finding signs of fraud

No one knows what really happened, failure of the courts to hold evidentiary hearings swept any evidence under the rug. It's funny how dems are screaming foul from the highest building tops. If there's no there there then what's to fear from a lil ole audit for fairness sake?

Let the audit speak for itself chicken shit. The voting rolls are so out of date they need to be purged and reconciled.
Arizona’s election board knows what really happened. They certified the results.
 
Ariz. audit underway, officials finding signs of fraud

https://www.oann.com/ariz-audit-underway-officials-finding-signs-of-fraud/

Ballot counters are working hard in Arizona to snuff-out voting irregularities in last year’s presidential election and fight off Democrat attempts to derail them.

On Sunday, forensic experts confirmed they are examining thousands of ballots cast in November as part of the audit in the Grand Canyon State. They are using ultra-violet lights to search for ballot watermarks and weed-out phony ballots.

Additionally, auditors have been split into several groups with some examining mail-in ballots and others inspecting ballot folders, envelopes along with other related items. Officials said evidence of systemic fraud has already started to show.

Democrat Party officials have tried to challenge the audit in court and they are deploying their operatives in the mainstream media in an attempt downplay the severity of election fraud as well as discredit Republican challenges to election security.

Arizona Republicans were able to continue the audit after thwarting Democrat attempts to derail the audit this weekend. On Friday, Democrats filed a temporary restraining order to stop auditors from counting the ballots. They later retreated from their position after a judge ordered them to pay $1 million if they lost their legal challenge.

The chair of the Arizona GOP, Dr. Kelly Ward, commented on the victory and gave insight into what’s to come. She said the state’s Supreme Court is set to make a decision to prevent Democrat attempts to stop the audit. The Arizona justices believe an audit is a constitutional right that protects election integrity and ensures the separation of powers.........
Yes, and the first fraudster they uncover will be Y O U
 
No one knows what really happened, failure of the courts to hold evidentiary hearings swept any evidence under the rug. It's funny how dems are screaming foul from the highest building tops. If there's no there there then what's to fear from a lil ole audit for fairness sake?

Let the audit speak for itself chicken shit. The voting rolls are so out of date they need to be purged and reconciled.

That sounds like you don't understand the election processes in place for your state. In every state, fraud claims must be made via the state's fraud claim process. Once the claim is made, each state election officials investigate those claims thoroughly and if credible claims have been made, refer to the state justice department for more investigation and possible indictment.

Saying "no one knows" is absolutely false and ignorant.

As for the audit, Republicans have made sure that people running the audit are believers in the big lie. They aren't allowing party observers or challengers....both of which were big complaints of the GOP in numerous states. (even though they had no basis for those complaints) Conservatives usually dislike wastes of taxpayer money...I guess they've abdicated that role to Democrats now.
 
Bout time they started playing the "progressive" game. :cool:

Democrats have never controlled the narrative. They can't even agree on a narrative....too many voices trying to speak at once.

Republicans oversimplify and ignore nuance....makes it easy. Instead of understanding immigration issues at multiple levels which need to be addressed, while also treating human beings with any level of decency, Republicans just throw it all together in the "Democrats want open borders" mantra. Simple to digest....easy for even stupid people to follow....easy to repeat.
 
I do appreciate the humor about this being a "historic" audit. The only historical piece that will be remembered is that big lie that spurred it and the Trumpists who were gullible enough to support it.
 
Democrats stole the election and Trump still scares the shit out of the left, so stock up on diapers and own what's coming.

Is that before or after Trump declares martial law and reveals that he's been controlling the military all along? Hard to keep track.
 
' We'll find that dern tootin' fraud by golly!'







(Even if we have to change the ballots by hand, in secret)
 
Democrats have never controlled the narrative.

Yea because they don't control all but 1 MSM outlet, silicon valley, Hollywood and nearly the entire public and the super majority of the private education system.

Zero control over the narrative there.....:rolleyes:

They can't even agree on a narrative....too many voices trying to speak at once.

On a micro level yea, but that's just politics. At the macro scale though they're all in that social and economic equity bandwagon and nearly all of them want it via federal authority. That much is near unanimously agreed upon and supported.

Republicans oversimplify and ignore nuance....makes it easy. Instead of understanding immigration issues at multiple levels which need to be addressed, while also treating human beings with any level of decency, Republicans just throw it all together in the "Democrats want open borders" mantra. Simple to digest....easy for even stupid people to follow....easy to repeat.

Think what you will about the (R)'s but they aren't wrong about the (D)'s.

They want open borders and a rapidly growing majority are comfortable coming out and saying so.

Got big protest to abolish ICE/CBP.....open borders, have for some time now.

They always get rave reviews and support from nearly the entirety of office holding (D)'s who seem TOTALLY uninterested in doing immigration reform.
 
Yea because they don't control all but 1 MSM outlet, silicon valley, Hollywood and nearly the entire public and the super majority of the private education system.

Zero control over the narrative there.....:rolleyes:

Yes, there are a lot of liberals in the country. But the narrative that wins elections is controlled by the right. (hence why people actually believe that the election was stolen)



On a micro level yea, but that's just politics. At the macro scale though they're all in that social and economic equity bandwagon and nearly all of them want it via federal authority. That much is near unanimously agreed upon and supported.
Equality via systemic reform is a popular thing. And rightfully so.


Think what you will about the (R)'s but they aren't wrong about the (D)'s.

They want open borders and a rapidly growing majority are comfortable coming out and saying so.

Got big protest to abolish ICE/CBP.....open borders, have for some time now.

They always get rave reviews and support from nearly the entirety of office holding (D)'s who seem TOTALLY uninterested in doing immigration reform.

No elected official has actually called for open borders. Reforming systems which are ineffective at their purpose and that treat humans as less than human is a noble goal.

No Congressional official on either side wants to actually do anything regarding immigration. They all enjoy having it to garner votes at election time and are perfectly happy letting the Executive branch take the bullets.

Again - oversimplification by the right to advance their narrative to demonize an entire party. No Democrat has called to remove border security...but Republicans don't believe that because their party lies to them about it. Socialism is another fun one...communism....etc. Welfare states in capitalist countries exist...they aren't socialism or communism.
 
Nobody tried to pull a coup.

Put the hyperbolic commie propaganda rags down. :D

Says one of the more hyperbolic, histrionic posters on the forum, LOL. :D

No one knows what really happened, failure of the courts to hold evidentiary hearings swept any evidence under the rug. It's funny how dems are screaming foul from the highest building tops. If there's no there there then what's to fear from a lil ole audit for fairness sake?

Let the audit speak for itself chicken shit. The voting rolls are so out of date they need to be purged and reconciled.

You mean when the courts refused to hear the Giuliani/Powell crazy conspiracy theories and the lawsuits had no evidence of actual fraud?

More like thrown out of court because of derp than sweeping anything under the rug.
 
Says one of the more hyperbolic, histrionic posters on the forum, LOL. :D

You mean when the courts refused to hear the Giuliani/Powell crazy conspiracy theories and the lawsuits had no evidence of actual fraud?

More like thrown out of court because of derp than sweeping anything under the rug.

Trumpies don't trust authority in any capacity. They would prefer to believe that thousands of people coordinated a massive fraud in order to defeat their savior than to accept that governmental officials, charged with investigating claims of fraud, along with court officials who resided over challenges to those results, did their job with dignity and ethical behavior.

Not to mention that the majority have no stamina to properly vet credibility, context and expertise of the people who are making those claims.

Pulitzer, a failed businessman who has no expertise in any election capacity, taking a phone call which purports to be someone hacking election machines during a hearing? That has to be a factual statement....why do we need anyone else to confirm that it happened? It obviously did because the man said that it did, not under oath.
 
That sounds like you don't understand the election processes in place for your state. In every state, fraud claims must be made via the state's fraud claim process. Once the claim is made, each state election officials investigate those claims thoroughly and if credible claims have been made, refer to the state justice department for more investigation and possible indictment.

Time after time allegations and lawsuits were submitted to the courts and were refuted for lack of standing or dismissed altogether for lack of evidence of fraud without scrutinizing the lawsuits from unprepared lawyers. I don't recall any evidentiary hearings at all. My point is not about chasing fraud as is more about frequency of irregularities such as signature verification, keeping the integrity of ballot envelopes and ballots. No doubt lawyers alleging fraud incorrectly weighed in more about a criminal violation than challenging process and was not the right approach. Canvasing the country with mail-in ballots where many states were unprepared, inaccurate and outdated voter rolls can have a more deleterious effect on the integrity of any elections and Pelosi knew that! Mail in ballots always favor democrats.

Saying "no one knows" is absolutely false and ignorant.

No one knows whether the integrity of our elections was breached, accountability of mail-in ballots was not as precise as it should have been, you know, one vote for one voter. You couldn't possibly know the effects on outcome with outdated voter rolls and millions of unsolicited ballots flooding the country. If you believe everything was above board then you're ignorant!

As for the audit, Republicans have made sure that people running the audit are believers in the big lie. They aren't allowing party observers or challengers....both of which were big complaints of the GOP in numerous states. (even though they had no basis for those complaints) Conservatives usually dislike wastes of taxpayer money...I guess they've abdicated that role to Democrats now.

This audit is an informational audit and doesn't change the election, nothing more than under constitutional law allowing states to secure voting procedures and adjust laws accordingly. If trends are found then they can act on them. This audit flies in the face of HR-1 and sends dems running around with their hair on fire. The progressive socialist movement wants to federalize everything and fuck the constitution.
 
Nobody with an operating brain thinks the election was stolen. Trump is a crybaby and his followers are gullible morons. Trumps supreme court appointees all agree. So sad. :)
 
Says one of the more hyperbolic, histrionic posters on the forum, LOL. :D



You mean when the courts refused to hear the Giuliani/Powell crazy conspiracy theories and the lawsuits had no evidence of actual fraud?

More like thrown out of court because of derp than sweeping anything under the rug.

No need to qualify it by pointing out BoBo's history of histrionic hyperbole.

The traitor in chief aka Putin's puppet, tried to stage a coup, but like everything else he did as a loser one term President, it failed.
 
Yes, there are a lot of liberals in the country. But the narrative that wins elections is controlled by the right. (hence why people actually believe that the election was stolen)




Equality via systemic reform is a popular thing. And rightfully so.




No elected official has actually called for open borders. Reforming systems which are ineffective at their purpose and that treat humans as less than human is a noble goal.

No Congressional official on either side wants to actually do anything regarding immigration. They all enjoy having it to garner votes at election time and are perfectly happy letting the Executive branch take the bullets.

Again - oversimplification by the right to advance their narrative to demonize an entire party. No Democrat has called to remove border security...but Republicans don't believe that because their party lies to them about it. Socialism is another fun one...communism....etc. Welfare states in capitalist countries exist...they aren't socialism or communism.


AOC has called for the abolishment of CPB and ICE, some have called for tearing down the wall completely. If you want illegals go down to the border and pick up a handful and take them home, because we as a country can't afford them ( 28 trillion in debt)
 
because we as a country can't afford them ( 28 trillion in debt)

*chuckles*, so where was your poutrage at Trump in 2017 when he implemented a tax cut that was not needed, and added a cool 1 Trillion unnecessarily to the debt then?
 
Same ol' delusions.

Same ol' scat fetish.

Same ol' lies about scat fetishes. You're mom didn't have one either just because she had to confront the diaper load you left her every morning, or when she had to tell you you were full of crap every time you'd wake up in the middle of the night cryin' about the Boogey Man being under your bed. Time to grow up, son.
 
Same ol' lies about scat fetishes. You're mom didn't have one either just because she had to confront the diaper load you left her every morning, or when she had to tell you you were full of crap every time you'd wake up in the middle of the night cryin' about the Boogey Man being under your bed. Time to grow up, son.
Did you hear that trump was humiliated last november then a bunch of his trumptards broke into the capitol and shit and pissed all over the place?
Talk about a bunch of sore losers. Lol
 
How do you figure? Every single looney excuse presented by the zany Giuliani/Powell conspiracy gang, including the “midnight votes” was thoroughly debunked.

You’re butthurt trump couldn’t pull an unconstitutional coup...very American of you.

None of those cases where granted full hearings in the court system. The feckless Judicial Branch refused to defend the Constitution, they refused due process to sworn affidavits, which are in fact, legal evidence on their face.
 
*chuckles*, so where was your poutrage at Trump in 2017 when he implemented a tax cut that was not needed, and added a cool 1 Trillion unnecessarily to the debt then?


*CHUCKLES* Since when does letting people keep more of their hard earned money add to the debt. Spending increases debt.
 
None of those cases where granted full hearings in the court system. The feckless Judicial Branch refused to defend the Constitution, they refused due process to sworn affidavits, which are in fact, legal evidence on their face.

Hearings weren't granted because they:
1. weren't asserting fraud claim disputes and
2. did not adequately demonstrate damages.

The affidavits, if properly submitted as claims to the state, were all processed and evaluated for credibility and validity. That is actually required as part of the election laws in every state.

You Trumpies seem to believe that someone swearing to an affidavit means everything in it is factual. Someone can claim there was fraud because they believe they saw something that amounts to fraud to them.....election officials understand the processes and context of each event in order to determine validity of the claim. Someone wearing a BLM shirt is not fraud.
Someone holding cardboard up so that the public is not able to compromise security by capturing something on film is not fraud.
Capturing devices on wifi that you believe amounts to all polling machines being online is not fraud.
 
Back
Top