SimonDoom
Kink Lord
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2015
- Posts
- 17,884
Do you regard yourself as an optimist or a pessimist, and does that identification affect your politics?
By optimist I mean somebody who thinks things are generally getting better and is hopeful about the future.
By pessimist I mean somebody who thinks things are generally getting worse and is not hopeful about the future.
I'm an optimist, without a doubt. I'm not a Pollyanna. Many things suck, as things have always sucked, but by most measures, things suck less than they did 40 years ago, or 100 years ago, or 200 years ago. There was no time in the past when things were better.
I don't believe progress is inevitable, but I think it's likely.
Some of Steven Pinker's books, such as The Better Angels of Our Nature or Enlightenment Now, more or less fit with how I think. His view is that enlightenment values, like the scientific method and value for individual rights and democracy, have created a better world, and we're likely to have a better world in the future if we maintain confidence in those values. I agree with that.
One of the nice things about being an optimist is that I don't feel that every election cycle is an apocalyptic battle to the death. I don't feel one side has to win at all costs. People have a way of being deeply, emotionally invested in their own point of view, cannot imagine the other point of view, and think that if the other side wins the next election the world will end. I think that's ridiculous. The reality is that we will keep swinging back and forth, but over time we'll probably--probably, not certainly--muddle our way to a better situation.
Thoughts?
By optimist I mean somebody who thinks things are generally getting better and is hopeful about the future.
By pessimist I mean somebody who thinks things are generally getting worse and is not hopeful about the future.
I'm an optimist, without a doubt. I'm not a Pollyanna. Many things suck, as things have always sucked, but by most measures, things suck less than they did 40 years ago, or 100 years ago, or 200 years ago. There was no time in the past when things were better.
I don't believe progress is inevitable, but I think it's likely.
Some of Steven Pinker's books, such as The Better Angels of Our Nature or Enlightenment Now, more or less fit with how I think. His view is that enlightenment values, like the scientific method and value for individual rights and democracy, have created a better world, and we're likely to have a better world in the future if we maintain confidence in those values. I agree with that.
One of the nice things about being an optimist is that I don't feel that every election cycle is an apocalyptic battle to the death. I don't feel one side has to win at all costs. People have a way of being deeply, emotionally invested in their own point of view, cannot imagine the other point of view, and think that if the other side wins the next election the world will end. I think that's ridiculous. The reality is that we will keep swinging back and forth, but over time we'll probably--probably, not certainly--muddle our way to a better situation.
Thoughts?